A Comprehensive Review of Sand Retention Test Methods and Data Analysis with a Focus of Application

Tanner Linden, C. Fischer
{"title":"A Comprehensive Review of Sand Retention Test Methods and Data Analysis with a Focus of Application","authors":"Tanner Linden, C. Fischer","doi":"10.2118/208845-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sand Control completions in long horizontal laterals often present challenging conditions because of a wide range of formation particle sizes and inflow rates which must be contained with a single completion. To aid in the screen selection process, laboratory testing of possible sand control media has proven to be a reliable method to improve the success of the completion.\n Soft sand completions are generally characterized into two classes of wellbore environments. A rapid wellbore collapse onto the screen or a gradual mechanical failure of the surrounding formation. Depending upon the type of wellbore environment encountered, one sand control test may provide a closer simulation to the failure phenomenon in the wellbore than another.\n This paper reviews three primary types of sand retention tests that include Constant Drawdown (pre-pack), Constant Rate, and Cyclical Brine. There are several variations on each test method, particularly the constant rate test method.\n The primary objective of any sand retention test method is to determine the amount and size of solids production through the sand control media with a specific particle size distribution. However, the various test methods provide additional performance data to aid in selecting a sand control system for a given environment. The Constant Drawdown method simulates a wellbore that is in conformance with the sand control media. This method provides retained screen permeability, as well as the formation and system permeabilities at multiple stress levels. Similarly, the Cyclical Brine method simulates a rapid wellbore collapse with an emphasis on injection well shut ins. This test provides system permeability data in both the injection and production flow directions. Lastly, the Constant Rate methods simulate a gradual or erosional failure of the wellbore on the sand control media. In these tests, a fluidized slurry contacts the sand control media in the open annulus, providing increasing pressure data with time.\n Using the sand retention data from these test methods a master curve is generated, which can predict how the screen will perform with various particle size distributions. A detailed analysis of particle size data down a lateral and interpretation with the Master Curves has been completed and provides a prediction of the performance of the sand retention media across the range of formation particle size distributions.\n By comparing the various evaluation methods through a reproducible sand retention study, we can optimize laboratory evaluation methods for a variety of wellbore environments. This provides the industry a comprehensive guide for matching wellbore specifications to the ideal laboratory sand retention evaluation method, optimizing the sand control selection to the well.","PeriodicalId":10891,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, February 24, 2022","volume":"64 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, February 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208845-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Sand Control completions in long horizontal laterals often present challenging conditions because of a wide range of formation particle sizes and inflow rates which must be contained with a single completion. To aid in the screen selection process, laboratory testing of possible sand control media has proven to be a reliable method to improve the success of the completion. Soft sand completions are generally characterized into two classes of wellbore environments. A rapid wellbore collapse onto the screen or a gradual mechanical failure of the surrounding formation. Depending upon the type of wellbore environment encountered, one sand control test may provide a closer simulation to the failure phenomenon in the wellbore than another. This paper reviews three primary types of sand retention tests that include Constant Drawdown (pre-pack), Constant Rate, and Cyclical Brine. There are several variations on each test method, particularly the constant rate test method. The primary objective of any sand retention test method is to determine the amount and size of solids production through the sand control media with a specific particle size distribution. However, the various test methods provide additional performance data to aid in selecting a sand control system for a given environment. The Constant Drawdown method simulates a wellbore that is in conformance with the sand control media. This method provides retained screen permeability, as well as the formation and system permeabilities at multiple stress levels. Similarly, the Cyclical Brine method simulates a rapid wellbore collapse with an emphasis on injection well shut ins. This test provides system permeability data in both the injection and production flow directions. Lastly, the Constant Rate methods simulate a gradual or erosional failure of the wellbore on the sand control media. In these tests, a fluidized slurry contacts the sand control media in the open annulus, providing increasing pressure data with time. Using the sand retention data from these test methods a master curve is generated, which can predict how the screen will perform with various particle size distributions. A detailed analysis of particle size data down a lateral and interpretation with the Master Curves has been completed and provides a prediction of the performance of the sand retention media across the range of formation particle size distributions. By comparing the various evaluation methods through a reproducible sand retention study, we can optimize laboratory evaluation methods for a variety of wellbore environments. This provides the industry a comprehensive guide for matching wellbore specifications to the ideal laboratory sand retention evaluation method, optimizing the sand control selection to the well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
留砂试验方法与数据分析综述及应用重点
长水平段的防砂完井通常具有挑战性,因为地层颗粒尺寸和流入速率范围很大,必须在一次完井中完成。为了帮助筛选过程,实验室测试可能的防砂介质已被证明是提高完井成功率的可靠方法。软砂完井通常分为两类井眼环境。井筒迅速坍塌到筛管上或周围地层逐渐发生机械故障。根据所遇到的井筒环境类型,一次防砂测试可能比另一次更接近于模拟井筒中的破坏现象。本文综述了三种主要类型的留砂测试,包括恒定压降(预充填)、恒定速率和循环盐水。每种测试方法都有几种变体,特别是恒速测试方法。任何留砂测试方法的主要目标都是通过具有特定粒径分布的防砂介质来确定产生固体的数量和尺寸。然而,各种测试方法提供了额外的性能数据,以帮助在特定环境下选择防砂系统。恒定压降法模拟了符合防砂介质的井筒。该方法提供了保留筛管渗透率,以及多种应力水平下的地层和系统渗透率。同样,循环盐水法模拟了快速井筒坍塌,重点是注入井关井。该测试提供了注入和生产两个方向的系统渗透率数据。最后,恒速方法模拟了防砂介质对井筒的逐渐或侵蚀破坏。在这些测试中,流态化泥浆在开放的环空中与防砂介质接触,随着时间的推移提供了越来越多的压力数据。利用这些测试方法获得的留砂数据,可以生成一条主曲线,该曲线可以预测筛管在不同粒度分布下的性能。对横向颗粒尺寸数据的详细分析和主曲线的解释已经完成,并提供了在地层颗粒尺寸分布范围内储砂介质性能的预测。通过可重复的留砂研究,对比各种评价方法,我们可以优化各种井眼环境的实验室评价方法。这为行业提供了将井筒规格与理想的实验室留砂评估方法相匹配的综合指南,优化了油井的防砂选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antigone Power: una straniera alle frontiere dell’Europa « La trace que laissent en nous les choses qu’on a perdues » Entretien avec la bédéiste Zeina Abirached Yves Chemla, Alba Pessini. « Jean-Claude Charles, 1949-2008. La ‘voix fêlée, comme une hirondelle grippée’ » La banalizzazione dello sguardo: Tempo di uccidere dal romanzo al film Humeurs dans les bois Prélude photo-poétique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1