Objects Shape Activation during Spoken Word Recognition in Preschoolers with Typical and Atypical Language Development: An Eye-tracking Study

IF 1.5 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Learning and Development Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI:10.1080/15475441.2021.1977643
A. Helo, Ernesto Guerra, C. J. Coloma, María Antonia Reyes, P. Rämä
{"title":"Objects Shape Activation during Spoken Word Recognition in Preschoolers with Typical and Atypical Language Development: An Eye-tracking Study","authors":"A. Helo, Ernesto Guerra, C. J. Coloma, María Antonia Reyes, P. Rämä","doi":"10.1080/15475441.2021.1977643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Visually situated spoken words activate phonological, visual, and semantic representations guiding overt attention during visual exploration. We compared the activation of these representations in children with and without developmental language disorder (DLD) across four eye-tracking experiments, with a particular focus on visual (shape) representations. Two types of trials were presented in each experiment. In Experiment 1, participants heard a word while seeing (1) an object visually associated with the spoken word (i.e., shape competitor) together with a phonologically related object (i.e., cohort competitor), or (2) a shape competitor with an unrelated object. In Experiment 2 and 3, participants heard a word while seeing (1) a shape competitor with an object semantically related to the spoken word (i.e., semantic competitor), or (2) a shape competitor with an unrelated object. In Experiment 4, children heard a word while seeing a semantic competitor with (1) the visual referent of the spoken or (2) with an unrelated object. The visual context was previewed for three seconds before the spoken word, except for Experiment 2, where it appeared at the onset of the spoken word (i.e., no preview). The results showed that when a preview was provided both groups were equally attracted by cohort and semantic competitors and preferred the shape competitors over the unrelated objects. However, shape preference disappeared in the DLD group when no preview was provided and when the shape competitor was presented with a semantic competitor. Our results indicate that children with DLD have a less efficient retrieval of shape representation during word recognition compared to typically developing children.","PeriodicalId":46642,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning and Development","volume":"23 1","pages":"324 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2021.1977643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Visually situated spoken words activate phonological, visual, and semantic representations guiding overt attention during visual exploration. We compared the activation of these representations in children with and without developmental language disorder (DLD) across four eye-tracking experiments, with a particular focus on visual (shape) representations. Two types of trials were presented in each experiment. In Experiment 1, participants heard a word while seeing (1) an object visually associated with the spoken word (i.e., shape competitor) together with a phonologically related object (i.e., cohort competitor), or (2) a shape competitor with an unrelated object. In Experiment 2 and 3, participants heard a word while seeing (1) a shape competitor with an object semantically related to the spoken word (i.e., semantic competitor), or (2) a shape competitor with an unrelated object. In Experiment 4, children heard a word while seeing a semantic competitor with (1) the visual referent of the spoken or (2) with an unrelated object. The visual context was previewed for three seconds before the spoken word, except for Experiment 2, where it appeared at the onset of the spoken word (i.e., no preview). The results showed that when a preview was provided both groups were equally attracted by cohort and semantic competitors and preferred the shape competitors over the unrelated objects. However, shape preference disappeared in the DLD group when no preview was provided and when the shape competitor was presented with a semantic competitor. Our results indicate that children with DLD have a less efficient retrieval of shape representation during word recognition compared to typically developing children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
典型和非典型语言发展学龄前儿童口语单词识别过程中物体形状激活的眼动研究
视觉定位的口语单词激活语音、视觉和语义表征,引导视觉探索过程中的显性注意力。我们通过四次眼动追踪实验,比较了有发展性语言障碍(DLD)和没有发展性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童这些表征的激活情况,特别关注视觉(形状)表征。在每个实验中提出了两种类型的试验。在实验1中,参与者在听到一个单词的同时,看到(1)视觉上与口语单词相关的物体(即形状竞争者)和语音上相关的物体(即队列竞争者),或(2)形状竞争者和不相关的物体。在实验2和实验3中,参与者在听到一个单词的同时看到(1)一个形状竞争者和一个语义上相关的物体(即语义竞争者),或(2)一个形状竞争者和一个不相关的物体。在实验4中,孩子们在听到一个单词的同时,看到一个与(1)说话的视觉所指或(2)不相关的物体的语义竞争对手。除了实验2外,视觉语境在口语单词开始时出现(即没有预览),在口语单词出现前三秒预览。结果表明,当提供预览时,两组人都同样被队列竞争者和语义竞争者所吸引,并且更倾向于形状竞争者而不是不相关的物体。然而,当不提供预览和当形状竞争对手与语义竞争对手一起呈现时,DLD组的形状偏好消失。我们的研究结果表明,与正常发育的儿童相比,患有DLD的儿童在单词识别过程中对形状表征的检索效率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Acquisition of a rare variant: ne-realization in the negative utterances of French children and their caregivers Thematic Content, Not Number Matching, Drives Syntactic Bootstrapping An Online Survey of Picture Book Reading Practices with Children Between the Ages of 0 and 30 Months Semantic Cues Facilitate Structural Generalizations in Artificial Language Learning Associations Between Joint Attention, Supported Joint Engagement and Language in TD Children and Children with ASD: Potential Sources of Individual and Group Differences in Language Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1