A Rhapsody for “Tuesday”: Undercurrents in Virginia Woolf’s The Waves (1931) and the Royal Ballet’s Woolf Works (2015)

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Interdisciplinary Literary Studies Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.5325/intelitestud.24.4.0469
C. Leung
{"title":"A Rhapsody for “Tuesday”: Undercurrents in Virginia Woolf’s The Waves (1931) and the Royal Ballet’s Woolf Works (2015)","authors":"C. Leung","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.24.4.0469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Despite its explicit allusion to Virginia Woolf, British choreographer Wayne McGregor’s modern ballet Woolf Works has not interested Woolf and modern scholars. Zeroing in on the final act (“Tuesday”) of McGregor’s Woolf Works, this article offers a revisionary reading of death, dance, and debilitation in The Waves by harnessing McGregor’s concurrent classical and avant-garde energies. Whereas interpretations of The Waves habitually lapse into the hackneyed invocation of its lyricism, I draw on its undercurrent and argue that both “Tuesday” and The Waves stage a break with this surface fluidity and the benign rhythm of the mundane. If McGregor’s “Tuesday” celebrates sinking with its antigravitational movements, The Waves condemns its characters, who are reluctant to relax their muscularity of control into a compulsive desire to stay afloat. As McGregor’s “Tuesday” suggests, there is an expedient labor in sinking, which Woolf configures as a movement toward truth. I thus read the inertness of sinking not as a failure to dance to what Lewis calls the “central rhythm” but an opposite energy that counters the military veneration of control and its mechanical adhesion to order in classical aesthetics.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"469 - 490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.24.4.0469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Despite its explicit allusion to Virginia Woolf, British choreographer Wayne McGregor’s modern ballet Woolf Works has not interested Woolf and modern scholars. Zeroing in on the final act (“Tuesday”) of McGregor’s Woolf Works, this article offers a revisionary reading of death, dance, and debilitation in The Waves by harnessing McGregor’s concurrent classical and avant-garde energies. Whereas interpretations of The Waves habitually lapse into the hackneyed invocation of its lyricism, I draw on its undercurrent and argue that both “Tuesday” and The Waves stage a break with this surface fluidity and the benign rhythm of the mundane. If McGregor’s “Tuesday” celebrates sinking with its antigravitational movements, The Waves condemns its characters, who are reluctant to relax their muscularity of control into a compulsive desire to stay afloat. As McGregor’s “Tuesday” suggests, there is an expedient labor in sinking, which Woolf configures as a movement toward truth. I thus read the inertness of sinking not as a failure to dance to what Lewis calls the “central rhythm” but an opposite energy that counters the military veneration of control and its mechanical adhesion to order in classical aesthetics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《星期二》的狂想曲:弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的《海浪》(1931)和英国皇家芭蕾舞团的《伍尔夫作品》(2015)中的暗流
尽管英国编舞家韦恩·麦格雷戈的现代芭蕾舞剧《伍尔夫作品》明确暗示了弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫,但伍尔夫和现代学者对这部作品并不感兴趣。本文聚焦于麦格雷戈的《伍尔夫作品》的最后一幕(“星期二”),通过利用麦格雷戈同时具有的古典和前卫的能量,对《海浪》中的死亡、舞蹈和衰弱进行了修正式的解读。虽然对《海浪》的解读习惯性地陷入了对其抒情风格的陈腐召唤,但我利用了它的暗流,认为《星期二》和《海浪》都打破了这种表面的流动性和世俗的良性节奏。如果说麦格雷戈的《星期二》用反重力运动来庆祝下沉,那么《海浪》则谴责了它的角色,他们不愿意放松自己的肌肉控制,而是强迫性地想要保持漂浮。正如麦格雷戈的《星期二》所暗示的那样,在下沉中有一种权宜之计,伍尔夫将其配置为一种走向真理的运动。因此,我将下沉的惰性解读为一种与刘易斯所说的“中心节奏”不一致的舞蹈,而是一种相反的能量,它对抗了对控制的军事崇拜,以及古典美学中对秩序的机械粘附。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
期刊最新文献
Negotiating Demons of the Mind: Psychological Distress, Social Apathy and Victimhood in Tagore’s The Garden (Malancha) Discourse and Madness in Shadows in the Sun The Weather Is Dirty: Jane Austen’s Use of Nature as a Social Agent Women’s Dilemma of Love: An Ethical Literary Interpretation of Miss Sophie’s Diary by Ding Ling Improvisation in Jack Kerouac’s “Jazz” Writing: Intersubjectivity, Authenticity, and the Collectivist Utopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1