Epidemiology of social phobia in Andalusia

Pablo González-Domenech , Blanca Gutiérrez , José Eduardo Muñoz-Negro , Esther Molina , Margarita Rivera , Jorge A. Cervilla
{"title":"Epidemiology of social phobia in Andalusia","authors":"Pablo González-Domenech ,&nbsp;Blanca Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;José Eduardo Muñoz-Negro ,&nbsp;Esther Molina ,&nbsp;Margarita Rivera ,&nbsp;Jorge A. Cervilla","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Population studies on social anxiety disorder (SAD) are relatively scarce and there is no previous reported evidence on prevalence or correlates of SAD in an Andalusian general population sample.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We used a random representative sample previously identified via standard stratification procedures. Thus, a final sample of 4507 participants were included (response rate 83.7%). Interviewees were thoroughly assessed on sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial factors, including: exposures to threatening life events (TLEs), childhood abuse, personality disorder and traits (neuroticism, impulsivity, paranoia), global functioning, physical health and toxics consumption. SAD diagnosis was ascertained using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Both, pooled prevalences (with 95% confidence intervals) and risk correlates for SAD were estimated using binary logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Estimated prevalence for SAD was 1.1% (95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.8-1.4). Having a SAD diagnosis was independently and significantly associated with younger age, poorer global functioning, higher neuroticism and paranoia personality traits, having suffered childhood abuse and exposure to previous TLEs. Furthermore, SAD was significantly associated with comorbid personality disorder, major depression, panic disorder and alcohol abuse.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among this large Andalusian population sample, the prevalence of SAD and its associated factors are relatively similar to previously reported international studies, although no population study had previously reported such a strong association with paranoia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 88-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S188898912100118X/pdfft?md5=af5c427f33f7345bcb88d06413d047fc&pid=1-s2.0-S188898912100118X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S188898912100118X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Population studies on social anxiety disorder (SAD) are relatively scarce and there is no previous reported evidence on prevalence or correlates of SAD in an Andalusian general population sample.

Material and methods

We used a random representative sample previously identified via standard stratification procedures. Thus, a final sample of 4507 participants were included (response rate 83.7%). Interviewees were thoroughly assessed on sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial factors, including: exposures to threatening life events (TLEs), childhood abuse, personality disorder and traits (neuroticism, impulsivity, paranoia), global functioning, physical health and toxics consumption. SAD diagnosis was ascertained using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Both, pooled prevalences (with 95% confidence intervals) and risk correlates for SAD were estimated using binary logistic regression.

Results

Estimated prevalence for SAD was 1.1% (95% CI = 0.8-1.4). Having a SAD diagnosis was independently and significantly associated with younger age, poorer global functioning, higher neuroticism and paranoia personality traits, having suffered childhood abuse and exposure to previous TLEs. Furthermore, SAD was significantly associated with comorbid personality disorder, major depression, panic disorder and alcohol abuse.

Conclusions

Among this large Andalusian population sample, the prevalence of SAD and its associated factors are relatively similar to previously reported international studies, although no population study had previously reported such a strong association with paranoia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安达卢西亚社交恐惧症流行病学
导言:有关社交焦虑症(SAD)的人群研究相对较少,以前也没有关于安达卢西亚普通人群样本中社交焦虑症患病率或相关因素的报道。因此,我们最终纳入了 4507 名参与者(回复率为 83.7%)。我们对受访者的社会人口学、临床和心理社会因素进行了全面评估,包括:威胁性生活事件(TLEs)暴露、童年虐待、人格障碍和特征(神经质、冲动、偏执)、整体功能、身体健康和毒物消耗。SAD诊断是通过迷你国际神经精神访谈确定的。采用二元逻辑回归法对 SAD 的合计患病率(含 95% 置信区间)和风险相关因素进行了估计。SAD 诊断与年龄较小、整体功能较差、神经质和偏执型人格特征较高、童年遭受过虐待以及曾患 TLEs 有着显著的独立相关性。此外,SAD 还与合并人格障碍、重度抑郁症、恐慌症和酗酒密切相关。结论在这一大规模的安达卢西亚人口样本中,SAD 的患病率及其相关因素与之前报道的国际研究相对相似,但之前没有人口研究报道过 SAD 与偏执狂有如此密切的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate change and mental health: The urgent warning of Brazil and Spain's 2024 catastrophic floods. Prediction of pharmacological response in OCD using machine learning techniques and clinical and neuropsychological variables. Luis Martín-Santos: A multidimensional psychiatrist. Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder Validation study of the Spanish brief version of TEMPS-A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1