Returning for HIV Test Results: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators

P. Ngangue, E. Bédard, H. Zomahoun, Julie Payne-Gagnon, C. Fournier, Jeannette Afounde, M. Gagnon
{"title":"Returning for HIV Test Results: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators","authors":"P. Ngangue, E. Bédard, H. Zomahoun, Julie Payne-Gagnon, C. Fournier, Jeannette Afounde, M. Gagnon","doi":"10.1155/2016/6304820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review aims to identify factors that facilitate or hinder the return for HIV test results. Four electronic databases were searched. Two independent reviewers selected eligible publications based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Quantitative studies published since 1985 were included. Thirty-six studies were included in the final review. Individual level barriers included sociodemographic characteristics, such as being a male, of young age and low education level, risk behaviours such as injecting drugs, having multiple sexual partners, and psychosocial factors. Older age, higher education level, being a woman, having high self-esteem, having coping skills, and holding insurance coverage were identified as facilitators. Interpersonal barriers and facilitators were linked to risk behaviours of sexual partners. Contextual barriers included essentially the HIV testing center and its characteristics. This review identified the most important factors that need to be addressed to ensure that people return for their HIV test results.","PeriodicalId":14433,"journal":{"name":"International Scholarly Research Notices","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Scholarly Research Notices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6304820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This systematic review aims to identify factors that facilitate or hinder the return for HIV test results. Four electronic databases were searched. Two independent reviewers selected eligible publications based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Quantitative studies published since 1985 were included. Thirty-six studies were included in the final review. Individual level barriers included sociodemographic characteristics, such as being a male, of young age and low education level, risk behaviours such as injecting drugs, having multiple sexual partners, and psychosocial factors. Older age, higher education level, being a woman, having high self-esteem, having coping skills, and holding insurance coverage were identified as facilitators. Interpersonal barriers and facilitators were linked to risk behaviours of sexual partners. Contextual barriers included essentially the HIV testing center and its characteristics. This review identified the most important factors that need to be addressed to ensure that people return for their HIV test results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
返回HIV检测结果:障碍和促进因素的系统回顾
本系统综述旨在确定促进或阻碍艾滋病毒检测结果返回的因素。检索了四个电子数据库。两名独立审稿人根据纳入/排除标准选择符合条件的出版物。包括1985年以来发表的定量研究。最后的综述包括36项研究。个体层面的障碍包括社会人口学特征,如男性、年龄小、受教育程度低、注射毒品等危险行为、拥有多个性伴侣以及心理社会因素。年龄较大、受教育程度较高、是女性、自尊心强、有应对技能、有保险被认为是促进因素。人际障碍和促进者与性伴侣的危险行为有关。环境障碍主要包括艾滋病毒检测中心及其特点。这次审查确定了需要解决的最重要因素,以确保人们返回接受艾滋病毒检测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retracted: Properties of PbS: Ni2+ Nanocrystals in Thin Films by Chemical Bath Deposition Retracted: Necrotizing Fasciitis: Diagnostic Challenges and Current Practices Corrigendum to “Correlation between First and Second Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry and Placental Bed Histopathology” Retracted: Innovative Therapies against Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Retracted: Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1