Income inequality and mobility in geometric Brownian motion with stochastic resetting: theoretical results and empirical evidence of non-ergodicity

Viktor Stojkoski, Petar Jolakoski, Arnab K. Pal, Trifce Sandev, L. Kocarev, R. Metzler
{"title":"Income inequality and mobility in geometric Brownian motion with stochastic resetting: theoretical results and empirical evidence of non-ergodicity","authors":"Viktor Stojkoski, Petar Jolakoski, Arnab K. Pal, Trifce Sandev, L. Kocarev, R. Metzler","doi":"10.1098/rsta.2021.0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore the role of non-ergodicity in the relationship between income inequality, the extent of concentration in the income distribution, and income mobility, the feasibility of an individual to change their position in the income rankings. For this purpose, we use the properties of an established model for income growth that includes ‘resetting’ as a stabilizing force to ensure stationary dynamics. We find that the dynamics of inequality is regime-dependent: it may range from a strictly non-ergodic state where this phenomenon has an increasing trend, up to a stable regime where inequality is steady and the system efficiently mimics ergodicity. Mobility measures, conversely, are always stable over time, but suggest that economies become less mobile in non-ergodic regimes. By fitting the model to empirical data for the income share of the top earners in the USA, we provide evidence that the income dynamics in this country is consistently in a regime in which non-ergodicity characterizes inequality and immobility. Our results can serve as a simple rationale for the observed real-world income dynamics and as such aid in addressing non-ergodicity in various empirical settings across the globe. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Kinetic exchange models of societies and economies’.","PeriodicalId":20020,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

We explore the role of non-ergodicity in the relationship between income inequality, the extent of concentration in the income distribution, and income mobility, the feasibility of an individual to change their position in the income rankings. For this purpose, we use the properties of an established model for income growth that includes ‘resetting’ as a stabilizing force to ensure stationary dynamics. We find that the dynamics of inequality is regime-dependent: it may range from a strictly non-ergodic state where this phenomenon has an increasing trend, up to a stable regime where inequality is steady and the system efficiently mimics ergodicity. Mobility measures, conversely, are always stable over time, but suggest that economies become less mobile in non-ergodic regimes. By fitting the model to empirical data for the income share of the top earners in the USA, we provide evidence that the income dynamics in this country is consistently in a regime in which non-ergodicity characterizes inequality and immobility. Our results can serve as a simple rationale for the observed real-world income dynamics and as such aid in addressing non-ergodicity in various empirical settings across the globe. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Kinetic exchange models of societies and economies’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有随机重置的几何布朗运动中的收入不平等和流动性:非遍历性的理论结果和经验证据
我们探讨了非遍历性在收入不平等、收入分配集中程度和收入流动性(个人改变其收入排名的可行性)之间的关系中所起的作用。为此,我们使用已建立的收入增长模型的属性,其中包括“重置”作为稳定力量,以确保平稳动态。我们发现不平等的动态是依赖于制度的:它可以从严格的非遍历状态(这种现象有增加趋势)到稳定的制度(不平等是稳定的,系统有效地模仿遍历)。相反,流动性指标随着时间的推移总是稳定的,但它表明,在非遍历制度下,经济的流动性会降低。通过将模型拟合到美国最高收入者收入份额的经验数据中,我们提供了证据,证明美国的收入动态始终处于一种以不平等和不流动性为特征的非遍历性制度中。我们的结果可以作为观察到的现实世界收入动态的简单原理,并有助于解决全球各种经验设置中的非遍历性问题。本文是“社会和经济的动态交换模型”主题的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The contribution of a catchment-scale advice network to successful agricultural drought adaptation in Northern Thailand Using machine learning to identify novel hydroclimate states The economics of managing water crises Benchmark worst droughts during the summer monsoon in India Status and prospects for drought forecasting: opportunities in artificial intelligence and hybrid physical–statistical forecasting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1