An every man, not for every woman: Nigel Farage and the radical right gender gap

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI:10.1080/17457289.2021.1968410
Roosmarijn A. de Geus, Elizabeth Ralph-Morrow
{"title":"An every man, not for every woman: Nigel Farage and the radical right gender gap","authors":"Roosmarijn A. de Geus, Elizabeth Ralph-Morrow","doi":"10.1080/17457289.2021.1968410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Support for the populist radical right (PRR) has surged across Europe. Existing studies on female support for the PRR are mostly cross-national in nature and have found that neither social-demographic nor attitudinal differences satisfactorily explain the gender gap in PRR support. Here we focus on the gender gap in support for UKIP and the Brexit Party, two parties that have significantly shaped British politics. Using data covering two European Parliamentary and three General Elections, we show that a gender gap exists in PRR support, but that it varies over time. In line with comparative studies, we find little evidence to suggest that social-demographic or attitudinal differences explain the gender gap in PRR support. Instead, we show that party leadership is crucial. Women in the British electorate hold negative opinions on Nigel Farage and this explains the gender gap in PRR support in Britain.","PeriodicalId":46791,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties","volume":"7 4 1","pages":"470 - 487"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1968410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Support for the populist radical right (PRR) has surged across Europe. Existing studies on female support for the PRR are mostly cross-national in nature and have found that neither social-demographic nor attitudinal differences satisfactorily explain the gender gap in PRR support. Here we focus on the gender gap in support for UKIP and the Brexit Party, two parties that have significantly shaped British politics. Using data covering two European Parliamentary and three General Elections, we show that a gender gap exists in PRR support, but that it varies over time. In line with comparative studies, we find little evidence to suggest that social-demographic or attitudinal differences explain the gender gap in PRR support. Instead, we show that party leadership is crucial. Women in the British electorate hold negative opinions on Nigel Farage and this explains the gender gap in PRR support in Britain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每个男人,而不是每个女人:奈杰尔·法拉奇和激进的右翼性别差距
民粹主义激进右翼(PRR)的支持率在欧洲各地飙升。现有关于女性对PRR支持的研究大多是跨国的,并且发现社会人口统计学和态度上的差异都不能令人满意地解释PRR支持的性别差异。在这里,我们关注的是对英国独立党和英国脱欧党的支持的性别差异,这两个政党对英国政治产生了重大影响。使用涵盖两次欧洲议会和三次大选的数据,我们表明在PRR支持方面存在性别差距,但随着时间的推移而变化。与比较研究一致,我们发现很少有证据表明社会人口或态度的差异可以解释PRR支持的性别差异。相反,我们表明党的领导是至关重要的。英国选民中的女性对奈杰尔·法拉奇持负面看法,这解释了英国PRR支持率的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Have heads cooled? Changes in radical partisanship from 2020–2022 Only losers use excuses? Exploring the association between the winner-loser gap and referendum attitudes following a local referendum The effect of signing ballot petitions on turnout Determinants of swing voting in Africa: evidence from Ghana's elections Issue salience and affective polarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1