Barriers and enablers to mental health help seeking of sexual, gender, and erotic minorities: A systematic literature review

T. Reynish, H. Hoang, Heather Bridgman, Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig
{"title":"Barriers and enablers to mental health help seeking of sexual, gender, and erotic minorities: A systematic literature review","authors":"T. Reynish, H. Hoang, Heather Bridgman, Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig","doi":"10.1080/19359705.2022.2036666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \n Introduction:\n Sexual, gender, and erotic minorities experience oppressions that psychologically harm and impact help seeking. The aim of this review was to integrate available evidence on the uptake, barriers, and facilitators of mental health help seeking in sexual, gender, and erotic minorities. \n Method:\n Systematic searches were conducted in CINAHL, Medline, and Scopus for peer-reviewed articles and in Google for gray literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies published in English in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries between 2008 and 2018 regarding sexual, gender, and erotic minorities older than 18 years were eligible. Quality assessments were conducted and extracted data were analyzed thematically. \n Result:\n Ninety documents were included in the review. Uptake is generally greater among sexual, gender, and erotic minorities, but worse in those who experience intersecting oppressions. Barriers to care manifest systemically, in services, and in individual mental health professionals (MHP) and contribute to psychological distress and impede help seeking. Protective factors (resilience, inclusion) and trained MHP counter these barriers. \n Conclusion:\n Despite the general prevalence and risk of mental illness among sexual, gender, and erotic minorities due to external, modifiable oppressions, opportunities for inclusive psychological care exist.","PeriodicalId":46675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","volume":"108 1","pages":"129 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2022.2036666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Sexual, gender, and erotic minorities experience oppressions that psychologically harm and impact help seeking. The aim of this review was to integrate available evidence on the uptake, barriers, and facilitators of mental health help seeking in sexual, gender, and erotic minorities. Method: Systematic searches were conducted in CINAHL, Medline, and Scopus for peer-reviewed articles and in Google for gray literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies published in English in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries between 2008 and 2018 regarding sexual, gender, and erotic minorities older than 18 years were eligible. Quality assessments were conducted and extracted data were analyzed thematically. Result: Ninety documents were included in the review. Uptake is generally greater among sexual, gender, and erotic minorities, but worse in those who experience intersecting oppressions. Barriers to care manifest systemically, in services, and in individual mental health professionals (MHP) and contribute to psychological distress and impede help seeking. Protective factors (resilience, inclusion) and trained MHP counter these barriers. Conclusion: Despite the general prevalence and risk of mental illness among sexual, gender, and erotic minorities due to external, modifiable oppressions, opportunities for inclusive psychological care exist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性、性别和性少数群体寻求心理健康帮助的障碍和促进因素:系统的文献综述
摘要引言:性、性别和性少数群体经历了心理伤害和影响帮助寻求的压迫。本综述的目的是整合关于性、性别和性少数群体寻求心理健康帮助的吸收、障碍和促进因素的现有证据。方法:在CINAHL、Medline和Scopus中系统搜索同行评议的文章,在Google中使用系统评价和meta分析指南的首选报告项进行灰色文献的系统搜索。2008年至2018年期间在经济合作与发展组织(oecd)国家以英语发表的关于18岁以上的性、性别和色情少数群体的研究符合条件。进行了质量评估,并对提取的数据进行了主题分析。结果:共纳入文献90篇。一般来说,性、性别和色情少数群体的吸收能力更强,但在那些经历过交叉压迫的人群中则更差。在服务机构和个人精神卫生专业人员(MHP)中,获得护理的障碍系统地表现出来,并导致心理困扰并阻碍寻求帮助。保护性因素(弹性、包容性)和训练有素的MHP可以克服这些障碍。结论:尽管由于外部的、可改变的压迫,性、性别和性少数群体普遍存在精神疾病和风险,但包容性心理护理的机会是存在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
The relation between internalized homophobia, coping, and psychological distress in French gay men Suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide methods, and correlates of suicidality among Nigerian LGBT persons: The role of minority stress. A narrative literature review Advancing LGBTQ+ mental health Mental health care for trans and gender diverse youth from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds: Reflections from communities of practice Mental health treatment experiences among sexual and gender minority individuals: Trauma exposure, barriers, microaggressions, and treatment satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1