Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on Twitter Protests in Mexico about the Ayotzinapa Case

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS Pub Date : 2019-11-30 DOI:10.17583/rimcis.2019.4637
Rocio Galarza Molina
{"title":"Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on Twitter Protests in Mexico about the Ayotzinapa Case","authors":"Rocio Galarza Molina","doi":"10.17583/rimcis.2019.4637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on a Twitter protest about the disappearance of 43 students in Mexico in 2014 known as the Ayotzinapa case which used the hashtag #PaseDeLista1al43. Social network analysis, interviews and thematic analyses of 3,616 tweets were conducted to investigate how networked gatekeeping and networked framing processes occurred within this networked public. Results show that on this digital protest, elite and non-elite Twitter users were in charge of gatekeeping activities, collaborating to maintain the discussion of the topic of the missing students. The analysis of frames revealed that the protest sought to: humanize the case emphasizing the life of the students; assign responsibility; and portray itself as a way to take an active role and coping emotionally with the disappearance. This works contributes to the literature on networked publics, combining network analysis with interviews to look beyond the digital footprint of the protest to listen to the perspectives of protesters, providing an insight into the dynamics of gatekeeping and framing within a network. Given the porosity, openness, and permanence of Twitter, results from such collaborative relationship of elite and non-elite voices to protest about an issue are now harder to ignore in the public sphere.","PeriodicalId":43006,"journal":{"name":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2019.4637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This research focuses on a Twitter protest about the disappearance of 43 students in Mexico in 2014 known as the Ayotzinapa case which used the hashtag #PaseDeLista1al43. Social network analysis, interviews and thematic analyses of 3,616 tweets were conducted to investigate how networked gatekeeping and networked framing processes occurred within this networked public. Results show that on this digital protest, elite and non-elite Twitter users were in charge of gatekeeping activities, collaborating to maintain the discussion of the topic of the missing students. The analysis of frames revealed that the protest sought to: humanize the case emphasizing the life of the students; assign responsibility; and portray itself as a way to take an active role and coping emotionally with the disappearance. This works contributes to the literature on networked publics, combining network analysis with interviews to look beyond the digital footprint of the protest to listen to the perspectives of protesters, providing an insight into the dynamics of gatekeeping and framing within a network. Given the porosity, openness, and permanence of Twitter, results from such collaborative relationship of elite and non-elite voices to protest about an issue are now harder to ignore in the public sphere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥针对Ayotzinapa案的Twitter抗议活动中的网络把关与网络框架
这项研究的重点是2014年墨西哥43名学生失踪事件的推特抗议活动,该事件使用了#PaseDeLista1al43的标签。对3616条推文进行了社会网络分析、访谈和主题分析,以调查网络把关和网络框架过程如何在这个网络公众中发生。结果表明,在这次数字抗议中,精英和非精英Twitter用户负责把关活动,合作维持对失踪学生话题的讨论。对框架的分析表明,抗议活动力求:将案件人性化,强调学生的生命;分配责任;把自己描绘成一种积极的角色,在情感上应对失踪。这项工作有助于网络公众的文献,将网络分析与访谈相结合,超越抗议的数字足迹,倾听抗议者的观点,提供对网络内把关和框架动态的洞察。鉴于Twitter的多孔性、开放性和持久性,精英和非精英的声音在公共领域抗议一个问题的合作关系所产生的结果现在更难以忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Harmonization Between Humans and Animals Particularly the Balinese Dog Race in Bali Ethics And Social Procedures In Lontara Pappaseng As A Guideline And Philosophy Of Life Of Buginese Society In South Sulawesi Hindu Religious Ethics Values and Tolerance In Darmakaya's Gaguritan An Analysis of Differences in Online and Offline Learning at Mahardika Elementary School of Denpasar Humanist, Pluralist, and Dialogical Concepts in Hindu Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1