Academic Achievement in Adults with a History of Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Population-Based Prospective Study

R. Voigt, S. Katusic, R. Colligan, J. Killian, A. Weaver, W. Barbaresi
{"title":"Academic Achievement in Adults with a History of Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Population-Based Prospective Study","authors":"R. Voigt, S. Katusic, R. Colligan, J. Killian, A. Weaver, W. Barbaresi","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Previous research on the developmental course of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is limited by biased clinic-referred samples and other methodological problems. Thus, questions about adult academic outcomes associated with childhood ADHD remain unanswered. Thus, the objective of this study was to describe academic outcomes in adulthood among incident cases of research-identified childhood ADHD versus non-ADHD referents from a population-based birth cohort. Method: Young adults with research-identified childhood ADHD (N = 232; mean age 27.0 yr; 72.0% men) and referents (N = 335; mean age 28.6 yr; 62.7% men) from a 1976 to 1982 birth cohort (N = 5699) were invited to participate in a followup study and were administered an academic achievement battery consisting of the basic reading component of the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement (WJ-III) and the arithmetic subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test—Third Edition (WRAT-3). Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using linear regression models, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbid learning disability status. Results: Childhood ADHD cases scored from 3 to 5 grade equivalents lower on all academic tests compared with referents, with mean (SD) standard scores of 95.7 (8.4) versus 101.8 (8.1) in basic reading; 95.0 (9.3) versus 101.9 (8.5) in letterword identification; 98.2 (8.6) versus 103.2 (9.2) in passage comprehension; 95.7 (9.1) versus 100.9 (9.0) in word attack; and 87.8 (12.9) versus 98.0 (12.0) in arithmetic. Conclusion: This is the first prospective, population-based study of adult academic outcomes of childhood ADHD. Our data provide evidence that childhood onset ADHD is associated with long-term underachievement in reading and math that may negatively impact ultimate educational attainment and occupational functioning in adulthood.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Objective: Previous research on the developmental course of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is limited by biased clinic-referred samples and other methodological problems. Thus, questions about adult academic outcomes associated with childhood ADHD remain unanswered. Thus, the objective of this study was to describe academic outcomes in adulthood among incident cases of research-identified childhood ADHD versus non-ADHD referents from a population-based birth cohort. Method: Young adults with research-identified childhood ADHD (N = 232; mean age 27.0 yr; 72.0% men) and referents (N = 335; mean age 28.6 yr; 62.7% men) from a 1976 to 1982 birth cohort (N = 5699) were invited to participate in a followup study and were administered an academic achievement battery consisting of the basic reading component of the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement (WJ-III) and the arithmetic subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test—Third Edition (WRAT-3). Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using linear regression models, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbid learning disability status. Results: Childhood ADHD cases scored from 3 to 5 grade equivalents lower on all academic tests compared with referents, with mean (SD) standard scores of 95.7 (8.4) versus 101.8 (8.1) in basic reading; 95.0 (9.3) versus 101.9 (8.5) in letterword identification; 98.2 (8.6) versus 103.2 (9.2) in passage comprehension; 95.7 (9.1) versus 100.9 (9.0) in word attack; and 87.8 (12.9) versus 98.0 (12.0) in arithmetic. Conclusion: This is the first prospective, population-based study of adult academic outcomes of childhood ADHD. Our data provide evidence that childhood onset ADHD is associated with long-term underachievement in reading and math that may negatively impact ultimate educational attainment and occupational functioning in adulthood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有儿童注意缺陷/多动障碍史的成人学业成绩:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究
目的:以往关于注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)发展过程的研究受到临床参考样本偏倚和其他方法学问题的限制。因此,关于成人学业成绩与儿童多动症的关系的问题仍然没有答案。因此,本研究的目的是描述在以人口为基础的出生队列中,研究确定的儿童ADHD与非ADHD的参考病例在成年期的学业结果。方法:研究确定患有儿童ADHD的年轻成人(N = 232;平均年龄27.0岁;72.0%男性)和参照物(N = 335;平均年龄28.6岁;从1976年至1982年的出生队列(N = 5699)中,62.7%的男性被邀请参加了一项随访研究,并进行了学术成就测试,包括伍德考克-约翰逊三世成就测试(WJ-III)的基本阅读部分和广义成就测试第三版(WRAT-3)的算术子测试。使用线性回归模型比较两组的结果,并对年龄、性别和共病学习障碍状态进行调整。结果:与参照对象相比,儿童ADHD患者在所有学术测试中的得分低3至5个等级分,基本阅读的平均(SD)标准得分为95.7(8.4)比101.8 (8.1);字母识别能力为95.0(9.3)比101.9 (8.5);段落理解得分为98.2(8.6)比103.2 (9.2);单词攻击95.7(9.1)对100.9 (9.0);87.8(12.9)对98.0(12.0)。结论:这是第一个基于人群的儿童ADHD成人学业成绩的前瞻性研究。我们的数据提供的证据表明,儿童期发病的多动症与长期的阅读和数学成绩不佳有关,这可能对成年后的最终教育成就和职业功能产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are There Bidirectional Influences Between Screen Time Exposure and Social Behavioral Traits in Young Children? Connectome Analysis in an Individual with SETD1B-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder and Epilepsy Decision-Making in Childhood Predicts Prodromal Eating Pathology in Adolescence Children and Youth with Complex Cerebral Palsy: Care and Management. The Grandfamily Guidebook: Wisdom and Support for Grandparents Raising Grandchildren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1