{"title":"Structures of Ca5(VO4)3Cl and Ca4.78(1)Na0.22(PO4)3Cl0.78: positions of channel anions and repulsion on the anion in apatite-type compounds","authors":"Mimiko Matsuura, H. Okudera","doi":"10.1107/s2052520622008095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single crystal specimens of apatite-type compounds Ca5(VO4)3Cl and Ca4.78 (1)Na0.22(PO4)3Cl0.78 were prepared with a flux-growth technique and their structures were examined with single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The anion channel is defined by a face-sharing array of nearly regular Ca octahedra, which run along c, together with flat O3 trigonal antiprisms that are concentric with the Ca octahedra and highly oblate in [001]. The position of the channel anion in Ca5(VO4)3Cl is split into two at [0, 0, ±0.1691 (6)] with half occupancies. Dynamic disorder among these two positions is suggested from a saddle-shaped electron density distribution through the Ca regular triangle, i.e. the shared face of the Ca octahedra at z = ¼. The position of Cl− was too close to Ca2+ under bond-valence consideration. This is due to repulsion on Cl− from the flat O3 trigonal antiprism which is located at z = 0, namely, in between pairs of split Cl site positions. Ca4.78 (1)Na0.22(PO4)3Cl0.78 crystallizes as a disordered hexagonal structure in which the crystallographic pattern is not an intermediate state but a projection of two distinct halves of the monoclinic pattern [doubled in b; Mackie, Elliot & Young (1972). Acta Cryst. B28, 1840–1848] in one hexagonal cell. In spite of quite different environments, the bond-valence sums for Cl− in these structures are large and similar to each other. The repulsion between O2− and Cl− and a demand for keeping Ca2+ and Cl− apart are balanced at the positions where bond-valence sums for Cl− are around 1.2.","PeriodicalId":7080,"journal":{"name":"Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials","volume":"227 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/s2052520622008095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Single crystal specimens of apatite-type compounds Ca5(VO4)3Cl and Ca4.78 (1)Na0.22(PO4)3Cl0.78 were prepared with a flux-growth technique and their structures were examined with single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The anion channel is defined by a face-sharing array of nearly regular Ca octahedra, which run along c, together with flat O3 trigonal antiprisms that are concentric with the Ca octahedra and highly oblate in [001]. The position of the channel anion in Ca5(VO4)3Cl is split into two at [0, 0, ±0.1691 (6)] with half occupancies. Dynamic disorder among these two positions is suggested from a saddle-shaped electron density distribution through the Ca regular triangle, i.e. the shared face of the Ca octahedra at z = ¼. The position of Cl− was too close to Ca2+ under bond-valence consideration. This is due to repulsion on Cl− from the flat O3 trigonal antiprism which is located at z = 0, namely, in between pairs of split Cl site positions. Ca4.78 (1)Na0.22(PO4)3Cl0.78 crystallizes as a disordered hexagonal structure in which the crystallographic pattern is not an intermediate state but a projection of two distinct halves of the monoclinic pattern [doubled in b; Mackie, Elliot & Young (1972). Acta Cryst. B28, 1840–1848] in one hexagonal cell. In spite of quite different environments, the bond-valence sums for Cl− in these structures are large and similar to each other. The repulsion between O2− and Cl− and a demand for keeping Ca2+ and Cl− apart are balanced at the positions where bond-valence sums for Cl− are around 1.2.