Evaluation of Peritoneal Lavage for Gastric Cancer Staging in Patients Without Ascites Based on Cytology and Carcinoembryonic Antigen

Fezzeh Elyasinia, F. Karimian, F. Samiei, E. Sadeghian
{"title":"Evaluation of Peritoneal Lavage for Gastric Cancer Staging in Patients Without Ascites Based on Cytology and Carcinoembryonic Antigen","authors":"Fezzeh Elyasinia, F. Karimian, F. Samiei, E. Sadeghian","doi":"10.18502/BCCR.V12I3.5770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Imaging, cytological examination of ascites (if present), laparosco- py, and peritoneal lavage are performed before surgery for gastric cancer staging. Peritoneal lavage aims to diagnose the microscopic presence of tumor cells on the peritoneal surface. Positive cytology may have a prognostic value that classifies the disorder as stage IV, in which the patient is no longer an elective surgical candidate. Thus, our study was designed to assess the ability of peritoneal lavage to stage gastric cancer in non-ascitic patients based on cytological evaluation and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level measurement. \nMethods: In our prospective study, we examined gastric cancer patients who were candidates for elective surgery. Upon entering the abdominal cavity and before tu- mor manipulation, normal saline (500 ml) was applied, and the abdominal cavity was thoroughly dispersed. After three minutes, the fluid was drained and addressed to cytological analysis and CEA measurement by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Study var- iables including age, sex, family history, tumor position, pathology, staging, grading, the original tumor size, regional lymph node involvement, and distant metastases were recorded during the pre- and postoperative staging. The association between positive peritoneal lavage cytology and various patients’ characteristics was investigated. \nResults: In this study, 94 patients were screened. Due to lymphoma and gastrointes- tinal stromal tumor (GIST), two patients were excluded. We examined 92 patients, including 63 males (68.5 %) and 29 females (31.5 %). The mean age of patients was 58.52 ± 11.87 years. The most common tumor location was the esophagogastric junction. Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma was the most frequent micro- scopic diagnosis. T3 was the most prevalent primary tumor size in 51 patients. Sev- enty-two patients (78.26%) were operable, of whom 18 (19.6 %) were positive for peritoneal lavage cytology. Positive cytology of peritoneal lavage was significantly related to tumor size, tumor grade, serosa/adjacent organ invasion (T4), laparoscopic staging findings, locally advanced disease (R0), and stage of the disease (P < 0.05). In the peritoneal lavage fluid, elevated CEA titers were significantly related to the high-grade tumor (P = 0.012).  \nConclusion: Our study demonstrated that positive cytology and high CEA titers in peritoneal lavage fluid of gastric cancer patients without ascites are significantly correlated to the advanced stages. \n ","PeriodicalId":8706,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/BCCR.V12I3.5770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Imaging, cytological examination of ascites (if present), laparosco- py, and peritoneal lavage are performed before surgery for gastric cancer staging. Peritoneal lavage aims to diagnose the microscopic presence of tumor cells on the peritoneal surface. Positive cytology may have a prognostic value that classifies the disorder as stage IV, in which the patient is no longer an elective surgical candidate. Thus, our study was designed to assess the ability of peritoneal lavage to stage gastric cancer in non-ascitic patients based on cytological evaluation and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level measurement. Methods: In our prospective study, we examined gastric cancer patients who were candidates for elective surgery. Upon entering the abdominal cavity and before tu- mor manipulation, normal saline (500 ml) was applied, and the abdominal cavity was thoroughly dispersed. After three minutes, the fluid was drained and addressed to cytological analysis and CEA measurement by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Study var- iables including age, sex, family history, tumor position, pathology, staging, grading, the original tumor size, regional lymph node involvement, and distant metastases were recorded during the pre- and postoperative staging. The association between positive peritoneal lavage cytology and various patients’ characteristics was investigated. Results: In this study, 94 patients were screened. Due to lymphoma and gastrointes- tinal stromal tumor (GIST), two patients were excluded. We examined 92 patients, including 63 males (68.5 %) and 29 females (31.5 %). The mean age of patients was 58.52 ± 11.87 years. The most common tumor location was the esophagogastric junction. Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma was the most frequent micro- scopic diagnosis. T3 was the most prevalent primary tumor size in 51 patients. Sev- enty-two patients (78.26%) were operable, of whom 18 (19.6 %) were positive for peritoneal lavage cytology. Positive cytology of peritoneal lavage was significantly related to tumor size, tumor grade, serosa/adjacent organ invasion (T4), laparoscopic staging findings, locally advanced disease (R0), and stage of the disease (P < 0.05). In the peritoneal lavage fluid, elevated CEA titers were significantly related to the high-grade tumor (P = 0.012).  Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that positive cytology and high CEA titers in peritoneal lavage fluid of gastric cancer patients without ascites are significantly correlated to the advanced stages.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于细胞学和癌胚抗原的腹腔灌洗对无腹水胃癌分期的评价
背景:胃癌分期术前应进行影像学检查、腹水细胞学检查(如有)、腹腔镜检查和腹腔灌洗。腹膜灌洗的目的是诊断腹膜表面的肿瘤细胞的显微镜存在。细胞学阳性可能具有将疾病分类为IV期的预后价值,其中患者不再是选择性手术候选人。因此,我们的研究旨在通过细胞学评估和癌胚抗原(CEA)水平测定来评估腹膜灌洗对非腹水患者胃癌分期的能力。方法:在我们的前瞻性研究中,我们检查了胃癌患者,他们是择期手术的候选人。在进入腹腔和进一步操作前,应用生理盐水(500 ml),腹腔彻底分散。三分钟后,排出液体,用放射免疫分析法(RIA)进行细胞学分析和CEA测定。研究变量包括年龄,性别,家族史,肿瘤位置,病理,分期,分级,原始肿瘤大小,区域淋巴结受累和远处转移,记录术前和术后分期。探讨腹膜灌洗细胞学阳性与患者各种特征的关系。结果:本研究共筛选94例患者。由于淋巴瘤和胃肠道间质瘤(GIST), 2例患者被排除。我们检查了92例患者,其中男性63例(68.5%),女性29例(31.5%)。患者平均年龄58.52±11.87岁。最常见的肿瘤位置是食管胃交界处。中分化腺癌是显微镜下最常见的诊断。在51例患者中,T3是最常见的原发肿瘤大小。72例(78.26%)可手术,其中18例(19.6%)腹膜灌洗细胞学阳性。腹膜灌洗细胞学阳性与肿瘤大小、肿瘤分级、浆膜/邻近脏器侵犯(T4)、腹腔镜分期、局部进展(R0)、疾病分期相关(P < 0.05)。在腹膜灌洗液中,CEA滴度升高与肿瘤高度相关(P = 0.012)。结论:无腹水的胃癌患者腹膜灌洗液细胞学阳性和CEA滴度高与胃癌的晚期有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Ursodeoxycholic acid and N-acetyl cysteine on Lymphoblast Viability Cross-Reacting Material 197, a Specific Inhibitor of HB-EGF, and Its Anticancer Effects Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in a Young Man with Unusual Presentation of Weight Loss, Bone Pain, and Abdominal Pain Effects of Gold Nanoparticles on Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer Cancer has an Independent Association with Death in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Single-center Study in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1