LOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC WORLD

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.32342/2074-5354-2023-1-58-1
A. Filipenko
{"title":"LOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC WORLD","authors":"A. Filipenko","doi":"10.32342/2074-5354-2023-1-58-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses logical approaches to explaining the economic world. The introductory part reveals the general prerequisites for the logical analysis of large systems. The rest of the study is devoted to the logical structure of economic worlds: at micro-, macro- and mega-levels. The logical dimensions of the economic world are based mainly on deterministic logic, grounded in Antiquity, Modern era and institutional logic of the late XIX and XX centuries. The dynamics and structure of the micro level (enterprise, firm, MNE) is explained by the institutional logic based on the American school (R. Coase, O. Williamson, etc.). Institutional logic in a broad sense includes values, norms, customs that people use in their daily activities on the scale of a certain space and time. Economic institutions have a long history, accompanying socio-economic development from the Neolithic era to the modern one. Their logic was shaped by the level of social, economic, technological, cultural development of various human communities of the ecumene. The macro-level of economics, on the one hand, is defined by deterministic (Laplace’s) logic. Its essence is to take into account the whole set of possible factors (economic and non-economic ones) that affect the course of economic dynamics. Individual needs, preferences, productive capacity, interaction of individuals create the layout of neoclassical model of economy. Keynesian deterministic logic is structural in nature, when the behaviour of individuals is determined by the general state of the economy as a whole. The logic of Marxist economic analysis, also known as overdeterminism, is derived from dialectics. On the other hand, the works of T. Veblen, the old American school of institutionalism and modern representatives (D. North, R. Nelson, J. Winter) are of paramount importance. The tools of logical analysis of the mega-level are mostly reflected in the works of G. Leibniz, I. Kant, R. Carnap and in modern institutional logic. The logic of globalisation, its historical phases can be traced according to different types of globalisation in four spatio-temporal dimensions: extensiveness, intensity, velocity and reciprocity and three deterministic logics: technical (technological), economic and political.","PeriodicalId":43307,"journal":{"name":"EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2023-1-58-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article addresses logical approaches to explaining the economic world. The introductory part reveals the general prerequisites for the logical analysis of large systems. The rest of the study is devoted to the logical structure of economic worlds: at micro-, macro- and mega-levels. The logical dimensions of the economic world are based mainly on deterministic logic, grounded in Antiquity, Modern era and institutional logic of the late XIX and XX centuries. The dynamics and structure of the micro level (enterprise, firm, MNE) is explained by the institutional logic based on the American school (R. Coase, O. Williamson, etc.). Institutional logic in a broad sense includes values, norms, customs that people use in their daily activities on the scale of a certain space and time. Economic institutions have a long history, accompanying socio-economic development from the Neolithic era to the modern one. Their logic was shaped by the level of social, economic, technological, cultural development of various human communities of the ecumene. The macro-level of economics, on the one hand, is defined by deterministic (Laplace’s) logic. Its essence is to take into account the whole set of possible factors (economic and non-economic ones) that affect the course of economic dynamics. Individual needs, preferences, productive capacity, interaction of individuals create the layout of neoclassical model of economy. Keynesian deterministic logic is structural in nature, when the behaviour of individuals is determined by the general state of the economy as a whole. The logic of Marxist economic analysis, also known as overdeterminism, is derived from dialectics. On the other hand, the works of T. Veblen, the old American school of institutionalism and modern representatives (D. North, R. Nelson, J. Winter) are of paramount importance. The tools of logical analysis of the mega-level are mostly reflected in the works of G. Leibniz, I. Kant, R. Carnap and in modern institutional logic. The logic of globalisation, its historical phases can be traced according to different types of globalisation in four spatio-temporal dimensions: extensiveness, intensity, velocity and reciprocity and three deterministic logics: technical (technological), economic and political.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球经济世界的逻辑维度
这篇文章阐述了解释经济世界的逻辑方法。引言部分揭示了对大系统进行逻辑分析的一般先决条件。研究的其余部分致力于经济世界的逻辑结构:在微观、宏观和宏观层面。经济世界的逻辑维度主要以确定性逻辑为基础,以古代、现代和19世纪末和20世纪的制度逻辑为基础。微观层面(企业、公司、跨国公司)的动态和结构由基于美国学派(R. Coase、O. Williamson等)的制度逻辑来解释。广义的制度逻辑包括在一定时空尺度上,人们在日常活动中所使用的价值观、规范、习俗等。经济制度源远流长,伴随着新石器时代到现代社会经济的发展。他们的逻辑是由不同人类团体的社会、经济、技术、文化发展水平所形成的。一方面,经济学的宏观层面是由确定性(拉普拉斯)逻辑定义的。它的本质是考虑影响经济动态过程的所有可能因素(经济因素和非经济因素)。个体的需求、偏好、生产能力、个体之间的相互作用创造了新古典经济模型的布局。凯恩斯决定论逻辑本质上是结构性的,即个人的行为是由整体经济的总体状况决定的。马克思主义经济分析的逻辑,又称过度决定论,来源于辩证法。另一方面,美国制度主义老学派和现代代表(D. North, R. Nelson, J. Winter)的T. Veblen的著作是至关重要的。大层次逻辑分析的工具主要体现在莱布尼茨、康德、卡尔纳普等人的著作和现代制度逻辑中。全球化的逻辑,其历史阶段可以根据不同类型的全球化在四个时空维度:广泛性,强度,速度和互惠和三个确定性逻辑:技术(技术),经济和政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW
EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW ECONOMICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
IPOs AND EVALUATION OF THE BORSA ISTANBUL IPO INDEX How Does Being Trusted Affect Sharing? Findings from the Ultimatum Game Kicking the Ladder or Not? Unraveling Income Inequality Perceptions in the World Male Alcohol Use, Intimate Partner Violence, and Female Autonomy Wage Returns to Field of Study-Occupation Mismatch in Turkish Graduate Labor Market: Quantile Regression Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1