A Recent Review of Risk-Based Inspection Development to Support Service Excellence in the Oil and Gas Industry: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective

Taufik Aditiyawarman, A. Kaban, J. Soedarsono
{"title":"A Recent Review of Risk-Based Inspection Development to Support Service Excellence in the Oil and Gas Industry: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective","authors":"Taufik Aditiyawarman, A. Kaban, J. Soedarsono","doi":"10.1115/1.4054558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Inspection and Maintenance methods development have a pivotal role in preventing the uncertainty-induced risks in the oil and gas industry. A key aspect of inspection is evaluating the risk of equipment from the scheduled and monitored assessment in the dynamic system. This activity includes assessing the modification factor's Probability of Failure (PoF) and calculating the equipment's remaining useful life (RUL). The traditional inspection model constitutes a partial solution to grouping the vast amount of real-data inspection and observations at equal intervals. This literature review aims to offer a comprehensive review concerning the benefit of Machine Learning (ML) in managing the risk while incorporating time-series forecasting studies and an overview of Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) methods (e.g. quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative). A literature review with a deductive approach is used to discuss the improvement of the clustering Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to overcome the non-circular shape data that may show in the K-Means models. Machine Learning classifiers such as Decision Trees, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, K-nearest neighbours, and Random Forests were selected to provide a platform for risk assessment and give a promising prediction towards the actual condition and their severity level of equipment. This work approaches complementary tools and grows interest in embedded artificial intelligence in Risk Management systems and can be used as the basis of more robust guidance to organize complexity in handling inspection data, but further and future research is required.","PeriodicalId":44694,"journal":{"name":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Inspection and Maintenance methods development have a pivotal role in preventing the uncertainty-induced risks in the oil and gas industry. A key aspect of inspection is evaluating the risk of equipment from the scheduled and monitored assessment in the dynamic system. This activity includes assessing the modification factor's Probability of Failure (PoF) and calculating the equipment's remaining useful life (RUL). The traditional inspection model constitutes a partial solution to grouping the vast amount of real-data inspection and observations at equal intervals. This literature review aims to offer a comprehensive review concerning the benefit of Machine Learning (ML) in managing the risk while incorporating time-series forecasting studies and an overview of Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) methods (e.g. quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative). A literature review with a deductive approach is used to discuss the improvement of the clustering Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to overcome the non-circular shape data that may show in the K-Means models. Machine Learning classifiers such as Decision Trees, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, K-nearest neighbours, and Random Forests were selected to provide a platform for risk assessment and give a promising prediction towards the actual condition and their severity level of equipment. This work approaches complementary tools and grows interest in embedded artificial intelligence in Risk Management systems and can be used as the basis of more robust guidance to organize complexity in handling inspection data, but further and future research is required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于风险的检测发展以支持油气行业的卓越服务:人工智能的视角
在油气行业中,检测和维护方法的开发对于预防不确定性风险起着关键作用。检查的一个关键方面是从动态系统的计划和监测评估中评估设备的风险。这项活动包括评估修改因素的失效概率(PoF)和计算设备的剩余使用寿命(RUL)。传统的检测模型是对大量实际数据的检测和观测数据进行等间隔分组的部分解决方案。本文献综述旨在全面回顾机器学习(ML)在管理风险方面的益处,同时结合时间序列预测研究和基于风险的检查(RBI)方法的概述(例如定量,半定量和定性)。通过文献综述和演绎方法讨论了聚类高斯混合模型(GMM)的改进,以克服K-Means模型中可能出现的非圆形数据。选择决策树、逻辑回归、支持向量机、k近邻和随机森林等机器学习分类器,为风险评估提供平台,并对设备的实际状况及其严重程度给出有希望的预测。这项工作接近补充工具,并增加了对风险管理系统中嵌入式人工智能的兴趣,可以用作更强大的指导基础,以组织处理检查数据的复杂性,但需要进一步和未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Verification and Validation of Rotating Machinery Using Digital Twin Risk Approach Based On the Fram Model for Vessel Traffic Management A Fault Detection Framework Based On Data-driven Digital Shadows Domain Adaptation Of Population-Based Of Bolted Joint Structures For Loss Detection Of Tightening Torque Human-Comfort Evaluation for A Patient-Transfer Robot through A Human-Robot Mechanical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1