A spatial-based explanation for institutional trust in Georgia: Evidence from the maternal healthcare system

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Eurasian Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/18793665221079344
Medea Badashvili, Anastasiya Byelousova, Parth Gupta, Amy H. Liu, Elise Pizzi, Michael Sanchez, L. Shengelia, Mariana Unapkoshvili, Lyndsey Wang, Katherina Wierschke
{"title":"A spatial-based explanation for institutional trust in Georgia: Evidence from the maternal healthcare system","authors":"Medea Badashvili, Anastasiya Byelousova, Parth Gupta, Amy H. Liu, Elise Pizzi, Michael Sanchez, L. Shengelia, Mariana Unapkoshvili, Lyndsey Wang, Katherina Wierschke","doi":"10.1177/18793665221079344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When an institution is not easily accessible—for example, it is geographically far—it can be hard for institutional trust to develop. The institution is not only unavailable, but it can also be seen as inappropriate, non-affordable, unapproachable, and unacceptable. In this paper, we examine whether reducing distance to medical facilities and professionals can improve trust in the maternal healthcare system. We do so by focusing on developments in Georgia. Since 2013, the government has aggressively closed the distance to service access not by building more facilities or hiring more staff per se, but by upgrading and funding existing facilities and professionals in a national network to better coordinate service provisions at the local levels. Employing an original survey, we match GPS coordinates to measure distance and use regression analysis to demonstrate how ensuring every woman has access to maternal healthcare at the right place at the right time has improved institutional trust in the system. The implications highlight results that are generalizable beyond both the country and maternal healthcare.","PeriodicalId":39195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eurasian Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"82 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eurasian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665221079344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When an institution is not easily accessible—for example, it is geographically far—it can be hard for institutional trust to develop. The institution is not only unavailable, but it can also be seen as inappropriate, non-affordable, unapproachable, and unacceptable. In this paper, we examine whether reducing distance to medical facilities and professionals can improve trust in the maternal healthcare system. We do so by focusing on developments in Georgia. Since 2013, the government has aggressively closed the distance to service access not by building more facilities or hiring more staff per se, but by upgrading and funding existing facilities and professionals in a national network to better coordinate service provisions at the local levels. Employing an original survey, we match GPS coordinates to measure distance and use regression analysis to demonstrate how ensuring every woman has access to maternal healthcare at the right place at the right time has improved institutional trust in the system. The implications highlight results that are generalizable beyond both the country and maternal healthcare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格鲁吉亚机构信任的空间解释:来自孕产妇保健系统的证据
当一个机构不容易接近时——例如,它在地理上遥远——就很难建立机构信任。这种机构不仅不可用,而且也可能被视为不合适的、负担不起的、不可接近的和不可接受的。在本文中,我们研究是否减少距离医疗设施和专业人员可以提高对孕产妇保健系统的信任。为此,我们将重点放在格鲁吉亚的事态发展上。自2013年以来,政府一直在积极缩小获得服务的距离,不是通过建造更多的设施或雇佣更多的员工,而是通过升级和资助国家网络中的现有设施和专业人员,以更好地协调地方层面的服务提供。采用原始调查,我们匹配GPS坐标来测量距离,并使用回归分析来证明如何确保每个妇女在正确的地点和正确的时间获得孕产妇保健,从而提高了对该系统的机构信任。其影响突出了可推广到国家和孕产妇保健之外的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eurasian Studies
Journal of Eurasian Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
In the shadow of war: Public opinion in the Baltic states, 2014 and 2021 The curious case of Aistija: Sidelights on Latvian–Lithuanian rapprochement during the 20th century Images of care: Marriage, family making, and the reproduction of the social order in Tajikistan Understanding the impact of social and academic factors on sense of belonging in higher education: A study from the Georgian educational landscape The effect of migration on economic and productivity growth in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1