Inattention and Hyperactivity in Children with Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Congenital Cytomegalovirus.

J. Topham, Jerry A Miller, G. W. Wright, M. Turcich, S. Vinson, Isabella Iovino, R. Voigt, Gail J. Demmler-Harrison
{"title":"Inattention and Hyperactivity in Children with Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Congenital Cytomegalovirus.","authors":"J. Topham, Jerry A Miller, G. W. Wright, M. Turcich, S. Vinson, Isabella Iovino, R. Voigt, Gail J. Demmler-Harrison","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo explore the relationship between congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) and inattention and hyperactivity among school-aged children.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition, parent- and self-report, was completed among children with symptomatic congenital CMV (ScCMV) (n = 36), asymptomatic congenital CMV (AcCMV) (n = 76), and controls (n = 29) enrolled in a longitudinal cohort. The proportions of children with ScCMV, AcCMV, and controls with Attention Problems or Hyperactivity T-scores ever ≥ 65 were compared. Mean T-scores in these domains were also compared and adjusted for IQ.\n\n\nRESULTS\nChildren with AcCMV did not differ from controls in the proportion of children with elevated Attention Problems or Hyperactivity T-scores or in mean Attention Problems or Hyperactivity T-scores. Children with ScCMV had a higher proportion of elevated Attention Problems T-scores compared with the AcCMV group but not controls. There were no differences in the proportions of children with elevated Hyperactivity T-scores between ScCMV and AcCMV or control groups. Children with ScCMV had higher mean Attention Problems T-scores versus those with AcCMV and controls and higher mean Hyperactivity T-scores versus those with AcCMV but not controls. After adjustment for IQ, differences in mean Attention Problems or Hyperactivity T-scores were no longer significant.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nChildren with AcCMV are not at increased risk of inattention or hyperactivity compared with controls. However, our study suggests an increased prevalence of inattention and hyperactivity among children with ScCMV. Differences in IQ were confirmed to have a confounding effect. Evaluation for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder may be warranted in this population.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To explore the relationship between congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) and inattention and hyperactivity among school-aged children. METHODS The Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition, parent- and self-report, was completed among children with symptomatic congenital CMV (ScCMV) (n = 36), asymptomatic congenital CMV (AcCMV) (n = 76), and controls (n = 29) enrolled in a longitudinal cohort. The proportions of children with ScCMV, AcCMV, and controls with Attention Problems or Hyperactivity T-scores ever ≥ 65 were compared. Mean T-scores in these domains were also compared and adjusted for IQ. RESULTS Children with AcCMV did not differ from controls in the proportion of children with elevated Attention Problems or Hyperactivity T-scores or in mean Attention Problems or Hyperactivity T-scores. Children with ScCMV had a higher proportion of elevated Attention Problems T-scores compared with the AcCMV group but not controls. There were no differences in the proportions of children with elevated Hyperactivity T-scores between ScCMV and AcCMV or control groups. Children with ScCMV had higher mean Attention Problems T-scores versus those with AcCMV and controls and higher mean Hyperactivity T-scores versus those with AcCMV but not controls. After adjustment for IQ, differences in mean Attention Problems or Hyperactivity T-scores were no longer significant. CONCLUSION Children with AcCMV are not at increased risk of inattention or hyperactivity compared with controls. However, our study suggests an increased prevalence of inattention and hyperactivity among children with ScCMV. Differences in IQ were confirmed to have a confounding effect. Evaluation for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder may be warranted in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有症状和无症状先天性巨细胞病毒患儿的注意力不集中和多动。
目的探讨先天性巨细胞病毒(CMV)与学龄期儿童注意力不集中、多动的关系。方法采用《儿童行为评估系统(第二版)》(父母和自我报告),对有症状的先天性巨细胞病毒(ScCMV)患儿(n = 36)、无症状的先天性巨细胞病毒(AcCMV)患儿(n = 76)和对照组(n = 29)进行纵向队列研究。比较ScCMV患儿、AcCMV患儿和对照组注意问题或多动t评分≥65的比例。这些领域的平均t分数也被比较并根据智商进行调整。结果AcCMV患儿注意问题或多动t分升高的比例,以及平均注意问题或多动t分的比例与对照组无显著差异。与AcCMV组相比,ScCMV患儿注意问题t分数升高的比例更高,但对照组没有。ScCMV组和AcCMV组或对照组中多动症t评分升高的儿童比例没有差异。ScCMV患儿的平均注意问题t分高于AcCMV和对照组患儿,平均多动t分高于AcCMV但没有对照组患儿。在对智商进行调整后,平均注意力问题或多动t分的差异不再显著。结论与对照组相比,AcCMV患儿注意力不集中或多动的风险没有增加。然而,我们的研究表明ScCMV患儿注意力不集中和多动的患病率增加。智商的差异被证实具有混淆效应。对这一人群的注意缺陷/多动障碍的评估可能是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are There Bidirectional Influences Between Screen Time Exposure and Social Behavioral Traits in Young Children? Connectome Analysis in an Individual with SETD1B-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder and Epilepsy Decision-Making in Childhood Predicts Prodromal Eating Pathology in Adolescence Children and Youth with Complex Cerebral Palsy: Care and Management. The Grandfamily Guidebook: Wisdom and Support for Grandparents Raising Grandchildren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1