Karl Popper’s Criticism of Totalitarianism in Plato’s The Republic

IF 0.1 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE TEXAS STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Pub Date : 2021-06-26 DOI:10.3968/12176
Chang Zheng
{"title":"Karl Popper’s Criticism of Totalitarianism in Plato’s The Republic","authors":"Chang Zheng","doi":"10.3968/12176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plato considers the original or most primitive form of society is closest to the form or concept of a state. It is the best state and it is ruled by the most intelligent and sacred people. But Moral degradation causes political corruption and produces a series of vicious chain reactions. Plato’s The Republic is the embodiment of his totalitarian thought. This reflects Plato’s disappointment with the Athenian democracy. Because of his disappointment, he turned his attention to oligarchy and totalitarianism, trying to find a starting point for solidification and finding the unchangeable form of idea. In the context of modern society, Popper criticizes Plato’s view of justice based on his ideology from the perspective of humanism, and he constructs his special view against historical determinism by criticizing Plato’s claim. Generally speaking, Plato’s political philosophy tends to be totalitarian, but his essentialist method is valuable in the field of sociological research, which can help us identify those things that are essentially the same in the changing historical course.","PeriodicalId":44154,"journal":{"name":"TEXAS STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXAS STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3968/12176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Plato considers the original or most primitive form of society is closest to the form or concept of a state. It is the best state and it is ruled by the most intelligent and sacred people. But Moral degradation causes political corruption and produces a series of vicious chain reactions. Plato’s The Republic is the embodiment of his totalitarian thought. This reflects Plato’s disappointment with the Athenian democracy. Because of his disappointment, he turned his attention to oligarchy and totalitarianism, trying to find a starting point for solidification and finding the unchangeable form of idea. In the context of modern society, Popper criticizes Plato’s view of justice based on his ideology from the perspective of humanism, and he constructs his special view against historical determinism by criticizing Plato’s claim. Generally speaking, Plato’s political philosophy tends to be totalitarian, but his essentialist method is valuable in the field of sociological research, which can help us identify those things that are essentially the same in the changing historical course.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柏拉图《理想国》中卡尔·波普尔对极权主义的批判
柏拉图认为最原始或最原始的社会形式最接近国家的形式或概念。它是最好的国家,由最聪明、最神圣的人统治。但道德沦丧导致政治腐败,并产生一系列恶性连锁反应。柏拉图的《理想国》是其极权主义思想的集中体现。这反映了柏拉图对雅典民主的失望。因为失望,他把注意力转向寡头政治和极权主义,试图寻找凝固的起点,寻找观念不变的形式。在现代社会背景下,波普尔从人本主义的视角出发,以其意识形态为基础对柏拉图的正义观进行批判,并通过批判柏拉图的主张,建构了自己独特的反对历史决定论的观点。总的来说,柏拉图的政治哲学倾向于极权主义,但他的本质主义方法在社会学研究领域是有价值的,它可以帮助我们识别那些在不断变化的历史进程中本质上相同的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
End of the Road: Joan Didion, Hunter S. Thompson, and True Crime in the Auto-Apocalyptic West What Is Aggro? Situationist Aesthetics in the Plays of Howard Brenton Reopening the Dan White Trial in Emily Mann’s Execution of Justice García Márquez’s Literary Smuggling in The Story of a Shipwrecked Sailor About Our Cover Art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1