Assessment of clinical skill competency of medical postgraduate students – Recommendations for upcoming CBME curriculum for postgraduates

R. Rajashree, Smita Kottagi, Triveni A. Jambale, G. Channashetti
{"title":"Assessment of clinical skill competency of medical postgraduate students – Recommendations for upcoming CBME curriculum for postgraduates","authors":"R. Rajashree, Smita Kottagi, Triveni A. Jambale, G. Channashetti","doi":"10.4103/bjhs.bjhs_9_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct observation of postgraduate medical trainees with actual patients by clinical faculty has traditionally been a standard tool to assess knowledge and skills in clinical subjects. By assessing and providing feedback to medical trainees performing a medical interview, physical examination, or counselling patients, faculty can facilitate budding physicians to have successful practice of medicine in their future. Despite the advances in clinical skills evaluation, direct observation has been a most popular and time tested method. However, observation of postgraduate medical students by faculty is very subjective and unfortunately often sporadic and non-standardized. Substantial amount of literature identifies several threats to its construct validity as an assessment tool. Although many tried to demonstrate methods to minimize those threats, there are many lacunae that remain inherent to direct observation method. Hence the need of the time is to relook at the observation as an assessment tool, instead of discarding the whole as inappropriate one. The authors initially made an effort to analyse the problems in present settings in India. After an extensive literature search authors advocate few additions and modifications to the existing system. Thus the present study not only highlights the pitfalls in the direct observation method but also suggests solutions for the problem.","PeriodicalId":9122,"journal":{"name":"BLDE University Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":"184 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLDE University Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjhs.bjhs_9_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct observation of postgraduate medical trainees with actual patients by clinical faculty has traditionally been a standard tool to assess knowledge and skills in clinical subjects. By assessing and providing feedback to medical trainees performing a medical interview, physical examination, or counselling patients, faculty can facilitate budding physicians to have successful practice of medicine in their future. Despite the advances in clinical skills evaluation, direct observation has been a most popular and time tested method. However, observation of postgraduate medical students by faculty is very subjective and unfortunately often sporadic and non-standardized. Substantial amount of literature identifies several threats to its construct validity as an assessment tool. Although many tried to demonstrate methods to minimize those threats, there are many lacunae that remain inherent to direct observation method. Hence the need of the time is to relook at the observation as an assessment tool, instead of discarding the whole as inappropriate one. The authors initially made an effort to analyse the problems in present settings in India. After an extensive literature search authors advocate few additions and modifications to the existing system. Thus the present study not only highlights the pitfalls in the direct observation method but also suggests solutions for the problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学研究生临床技能能力评估-对即将到来的研究生CBME课程的建议
传统上,临床教师对医学研究生实习生与实际患者的直接观察是评估临床学科知识和技能的标准工具。通过评估和提供反馈给医学实习生进行医学访谈,身体检查,或咨询病人,教师可以促进崭露头角的医生有成功的医学实践在他们的未来。尽管在临床技能评估方面取得了进展,但直接观察一直是最受欢迎和经过时间考验的方法。然而,教师对医学研究生的观察是非常主观的,不幸的是,往往是零星的和不规范的。大量的文献指出了对其作为评估工具的结构效度的几个威胁。尽管许多人试图展示将这些威胁最小化的方法,但直接观察法仍然存在许多固有的缺陷。因此,现在需要的是将观察作为一种评估工具重新审视,而不是将整体视为不适当的工具而抛弃。作者最初努力分析了印度当前环境中的问题。经过广泛的文献检索,作者主张对现有系统进行少量的补充和修改。因此,本研究不仅突出了直接观察法的缺陷,而且提出了解决问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reviewing placental volumetry and thickness and its correlation with adverse feto maternal outcome - A cross sectional study in Western India Extradigital glomus tumor – A rare case report Exploring the efficiency of methemoglobin reductase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in maintaining the hemoglobin auto-oxidation-mediated oxidative imbalance among different grades of cigarette smokers Assessment of motor function by development of a new program in community-dwelling elderly: A pilot study Epidemiological study on nonsyndromic hearing impairment: North Karnataka, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1