Evaluation of Marginal Fit and Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Implant Abutment Supporting Two Types of Metal Free CAD/ CAM Restorations

Ayat Montaser
{"title":"Evaluation of Marginal Fit and Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Implant Abutment Supporting Two Types of Metal Free CAD/ CAM Restorations","authors":"Ayat Montaser","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2022.109371.1460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate marginal fit as well as fracture resistance of zirconia implant abutment supporting two types of metal free CAD/CAM restorations. Materials and methods: Twenty ready-made ZrO2 abutments resembling lower first premolar squeezed and stabled to its conforming titanium dummy implants were implanted in epoxy resin blocks. Samples were divided into two groups in relation to the material utilized for the fabrication of the copings; group (I) (n=10): zirconia copings, group (II) (n=10): breCAM.BioHPP copings. All copings were machined using CAD/CAM system. Samples were exposed to a fatigue procedure for 20,000 cycles. Marginal fit was determined using digital stereomicroscope. Fracture resistance was registered using universal testing machine. The samples were overloaded till last fracture occurred and load at fracture was documented. Analysis of data was examined using accessible software programme (SPSS 18). Results: BreCAM.BioHPP copings, group (II), registered a statistically significant higher mean vertical marginal gap value (122.08±25.05μm) in addition to higher mean failure load value (2828.47±735.4N) compared to zirconia copings, group (I) (27.06±3.2μm) (416.06±22.16N) respectively. Conclusions: Material type used for the fabrication of the copings influences marginal fit and fracture resistance. Zirconia coping samples showed higher marginal fit and lower fracture resistance than breCAM.BioHPP coping samples.","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2022.109371.1460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate marginal fit as well as fracture resistance of zirconia implant abutment supporting two types of metal free CAD/CAM restorations. Materials and methods: Twenty ready-made ZrO2 abutments resembling lower first premolar squeezed and stabled to its conforming titanium dummy implants were implanted in epoxy resin blocks. Samples were divided into two groups in relation to the material utilized for the fabrication of the copings; group (I) (n=10): zirconia copings, group (II) (n=10): breCAM.BioHPP copings. All copings were machined using CAD/CAM system. Samples were exposed to a fatigue procedure for 20,000 cycles. Marginal fit was determined using digital stereomicroscope. Fracture resistance was registered using universal testing machine. The samples were overloaded till last fracture occurred and load at fracture was documented. Analysis of data was examined using accessible software programme (SPSS 18). Results: BreCAM.BioHPP copings, group (II), registered a statistically significant higher mean vertical marginal gap value (122.08±25.05μm) in addition to higher mean failure load value (2828.47±735.4N) compared to zirconia copings, group (I) (27.06±3.2μm) (416.06±22.16N) respectively. Conclusions: Material type used for the fabrication of the copings influences marginal fit and fracture resistance. Zirconia coping samples showed higher marginal fit and lower fracture resistance than breCAM.BioHPP coping samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种无金属CAD/ CAM修复体氧化锆种植基台的边缘贴合及抗断裂性评价
目的:评价氧化锆种植基台支持两种无金属CAD/CAM修复体的边缘配合和抗骨折性。材料和方法:将20个现成的ZrO2基牙植入环氧树脂块中,类似于下第一前磨牙挤压稳定的钛假体种植体。样品被分为两组有关的材料用于制作覆盖;组(I) (n=10):氧化锆覆层,组(II) (n=10): breCAM。BioHPP应对。所有工件均采用CAD/CAM系统加工。样品经受了2万次的疲劳处理。采用数字立体显微镜确定边际拟合。断裂抗力采用万能试验机进行登记。试样被超载直到最后一次断裂发生,并记录了断裂时的载荷。数据分析采用可访问的软件程序(SPSS 18)。结果:BreCAM。BioHPP涂层(II)组的平均垂直边缘间隙值(122.08±25.05μm)和平均失效载荷值(2828.47±735.4N)均高于氧化锆涂层(I)组(27.06±3.2μm)(416.06±22.16N),具有统计学意义。结论:所使用的材料类型会影响边缘配合和抗断裂能力。与breCAM相比,氧化锆顶部样品具有更高的边缘配合度和更低的抗断裂能力。BioHPP复制样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Aloe vera in Treatment of Experimentally Induced Oral Lichenoid Reaction Evaluation of Local Versus Intravenous Administration of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells on Regeneration of Oral Epithelium of Chemotherapy Treated Rats The Influence of Different Implant Abutment Sizes on Fracture Resistance of Two Monolithic Ceramic Crown Systems Effect of Irradiation with 980-nm Diode Laser on the Microhardness of Young and Old Root Canal Dentin after Treatment with Chemical Solutions Evaluation of Occlusal Pressure Pattern and Dimensional Changes of the Lined Dentures Subjected to Microwave Disinfection Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1