Minimize formation damage by rapid, inexpensive method of completion- and stimulation-fluid selection

D. Underdown, M. Conway
{"title":"Minimize formation damage by rapid, inexpensive method of completion- and stimulation-fluid selection","authors":"D. Underdown, M. Conway","doi":"10.2118/19432-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimizing or removing formation damage is a major objective in completion and stimulation operations. Formation damage is minimized by selection of nondamaging fluid systems and operations on the basis of petrographic analysis and field experience. A technique know as the capillary suction time (CST) test, adopted from the drilling-fluid industry, provides a quick and inexpensive method for qualitative selection or screening of the least damaging fluid system for a particular formation. The CST test is a fundamental filtration method for determining the electrolyte concentration that will produce the maximum inhibiting effect on formation. The method uses an instrument to measure the time required for a liquid to travel a calibrated distance on a standard porous filter paper. The CST procedure currently is used very successfully to select completion fluids and to evaluate stimulation-fluid additives. This paper explains the procedure, discusses limitations of the test, and presents laboratory and field data to sto show the value of the technique.","PeriodicalId":22020,"journal":{"name":"Spe Production Engineering","volume":"41 1","pages":"56-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spe Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/19432-PA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Minimizing or removing formation damage is a major objective in completion and stimulation operations. Formation damage is minimized by selection of nondamaging fluid systems and operations on the basis of petrographic analysis and field experience. A technique know as the capillary suction time (CST) test, adopted from the drilling-fluid industry, provides a quick and inexpensive method for qualitative selection or screening of the least damaging fluid system for a particular formation. The CST test is a fundamental filtration method for determining the electrolyte concentration that will produce the maximum inhibiting effect on formation. The method uses an instrument to measure the time required for a liquid to travel a calibrated distance on a standard porous filter paper. The CST procedure currently is used very successfully to select completion fluids and to evaluate stimulation-fluid additives. This paper explains the procedure, discusses limitations of the test, and presents laboratory and field data to sto show the value of the technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过快速、廉价的完井和增产液选择方法,将地层损害降到最低
减少或消除地层损害是完井和增产作业的主要目标。在岩石学分析和现场经验的基础上,通过选择无害的流体体系和作业,将地层损害降到最低。一种被称为毛细管吸入时间(CST)测试的技术,从钻井液行业中被采用,为定性选择或筛选特定地层中危害最小的流体系统提供了一种快速、廉价的方法。CST测试是一种基本的过滤方法,用于确定对地层产生最大抑制作用的电解质浓度。该方法使用仪器测量液体在标准多孔滤纸上移动校准距离所需的时间。目前,CST技术在选择完井液和评估增产液添加剂方面非常成功。本文解释了测试的程序,讨论了测试的局限性,并提供了实验室和现场数据来说明该技术的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phase splitting of wet steam in annular flow through a horizontal impacting tee Corrosion performance of welded CRA-lined pipes for flowlines Breaker concentrations required to improve the permeability of proppant packs damaged by concentrated linear and borate-crosslinked fracturing fluids Incorporation of 2D fluid flow into a pseudo-3D hydraulic fracturing simulator Application of curable resin-coated proppants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1