Rebuilding the Future: C. A. Doxiadis and the Greek Reconstruction Effort (1945-1950)

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Historical Review-La Revue Historique Pub Date : 2013-12-13 DOI:10.12681/HR.309
Andreas Kakridis
{"title":"Rebuilding the Future: C. A. Doxiadis and the Greek Reconstruction Effort (1945-1950)","authors":"Andreas Kakridis","doi":"10.12681/HR.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of ideas – and the individuals propagating them – is enhanced at times of crisis. When existing arrangements are challenged, new ideas help reconfigure group interests and alliances, forge new institutions and plan the future. This paper looks at one such set of ideas, born in response to the crisis facing Greece’s post-war economy: the views of Constantinos Doxiadis, an architect, senior civil servant and policy-maker active in Greece’s recovery programme. Drawing on policy documents, publications and memoranda, the paper sketches the values, intellectual influences and methods underpinning Doxiadis’ views on reconstruction. This casts light on the origins of his later proposals for a science of ekistics, whilst also undermining the conventional notion that left-wing theorists were alone in advancing progressive views of Greek development before 1947. In fact, Doxiadis’ vision seeks to transcend the Right–Left divide by presenting economic progress as an apolitical, scientific process, which would render ideology irrelevant. Such views owe much to the intellectual tradition of interwar technocracy and played a key role in shaping the concept of economic development after 1945.","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The importance of ideas – and the individuals propagating them – is enhanced at times of crisis. When existing arrangements are challenged, new ideas help reconfigure group interests and alliances, forge new institutions and plan the future. This paper looks at one such set of ideas, born in response to the crisis facing Greece’s post-war economy: the views of Constantinos Doxiadis, an architect, senior civil servant and policy-maker active in Greece’s recovery programme. Drawing on policy documents, publications and memoranda, the paper sketches the values, intellectual influences and methods underpinning Doxiadis’ views on reconstruction. This casts light on the origins of his later proposals for a science of ekistics, whilst also undermining the conventional notion that left-wing theorists were alone in advancing progressive views of Greek development before 1947. In fact, Doxiadis’ vision seeks to transcend the Right–Left divide by presenting economic progress as an apolitical, scientific process, which would render ideology irrelevant. Such views owe much to the intellectual tradition of interwar technocracy and played a key role in shaping the concept of economic development after 1945.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重建未来:C. A. Doxiadis和希腊重建工作(1945-1950)
思想——以及传播思想的个人——的重要性在危机时刻得到加强。当现有的安排受到挑战时,新的想法有助于重新配置集团利益和联盟,建立新的机构和规划未来。本文着眼于这样一套思想,它诞生于对希腊战后经济面临的危机的回应:康斯坦丁诺斯·多夏迪斯(Constantinos Doxiadis)的观点,他是一名建筑师、高级公务员和积极参与希腊复苏计划的政策制定者。根据政策文件、出版物和备忘录,本文概述了支撑Doxiadis重建观点的价值观、思想影响和方法。这一发现揭示了他后来提出的建立一门科学的建议的起源,同时也削弱了左翼理论家在1947年之前推进希腊发展的进步观点的传统观念。事实上,Doxiadis的愿景试图通过将经济进步呈现为一个非政治的、科学的过程来超越左右派的分歧,这将使意识形态变得无关紧要。这种观点在很大程度上归功于两次世界大战之间的技术官僚的知识传统,并在1945年后形成经济发展概念方面发挥了关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diego Venturino (éd.), OEuvres complètes de Voltaire An Optical Revolution and an “Unfortunate” Exhibition: “Van Eyck: An Optical Revolution,” Museum of Fine Arts, Ghent Foreword to C. Th. Dimaras Annual Lecture, 2019 Olga Katsiardi-Hering, Anastasia Papadia-Lala, Katerina Nikolaou and Vangelis Karamanolakis (eds.), Έλλην, Ρωμηός, Γραικός: Συλλογικοί προσδιορισμοί και ταυτότητες [Hellene, Romios, Greek: Collective designations and identities] Introduction: Modern Greek theatre on the threshhold of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1