Phases of systemic inflammation in septic and haemorrhagic shocks

Liliya V. Solmatina, N. Zotova, Yu. A. Zhuravleva, A. Brazhnikov, E. Gusev
{"title":"Phases of systemic inflammation in septic and haemorrhagic shocks","authors":"Liliya V. Solmatina, N. Zotova, Yu. A. Zhuravleva, A. Brazhnikov, E. Gusev","doi":"10.46235/1028-7221-9974-pos","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shocks of different origin (both septic and aseptic) be be considered clinical equivalents of systemic inflammation (SI) with following main manifestations : pronounced hypercytokinemia, other markers of systemic inflammatory response (SIR), coagulopathy, multiple organ failure (MOF), hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) distress, systemic tissue alteration. In general, these phenomena are directly and inversely related to systemic microcirculatory disturbances which determine the pathogenesis of distinct shock states. The aim of our study was to identify the features of SI phases in the development of two variants of septic shock, i.e., acute course (first week of the process) and prolonged/subacute sepsis (2 to 6 weeks from the onset of manifestations), as well as haemorrhagic shock studied 4-12 hours from the onset of massive blood loss. To verify the SI phases, we used the previously proposed SI scale, including the value of six SIR levels (RL-0-5), as well as additional criteria of SI, i.e., evaluation of clinical MOF grade (SOFA scale), plasma D-dimers ( 500 ng/mL), cortisol ( 1380 nmol/mL), tissue alteration markers, e.g., myoglobin ( 800 ng/mL) and/or troponin I ( 0.2 ng/mL). To calculate RL in SIR, plasma CRP and four cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF) were determined. The presence of SI was established if the SI scale exceeded 5 points (numerical RL values + presence of additional criteria, each equal to 1 point). The time and severity of the developing critical state, as well as the RL scores, were taken into account when reviewing the phases. \nThere were three main SI phases: (1) evolving condition, (2) cytokine storm/phlogogenic hit (SD-4-5), and depressive (exhausting) phase. The latter was characterized by relatively low SIR values (RL-2-3). The lethality rate for shock in the presence of acute sepsis (n = 13) was 71.4%, reaching 94.1% in prolonged sepsis (n = 17). For haemorrhagic shock after massive blood loss, if not resolved within 24 hoursm the mortality rates was 53.8% (n = 13). Development of shock in acute sepsis, and haemorrhagic shock (within 4 to 12 hours after the onset of massive blood loss) is accompanied by the severity of critical-phase cytokine storm/PPS with a predominance of RL-5 in cases of lethal outcomes, and by a depression phase (RL-2-3) in prolonged sepsis. Overall mortality (for all groups) was 66.7% in the PS phase, 89.5% in the depressive phase and 15.4% in the evolvingl phase of haemorrhagic shock (with possible transition from this phase to the more critical SI phases until lethal outcome). \nShock states of both septic and aseptic origin are based on a typical pathological process of SI, which should be distinguished from the signs of SIR characteristic of high-intensity canonical inflammation. It is characterized by higher cytokinemia (cytokine storm phase) or by the presence of additional SI phenomena with relatively moderate SIR levels (depressive SI phase). Thus, the depressive phase of SI is more fatal for disease outcome compared to the cytokine storm phase with higher intensity of SIR.","PeriodicalId":21524,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46235/1028-7221-9974-pos","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shocks of different origin (both septic and aseptic) be be considered clinical equivalents of systemic inflammation (SI) with following main manifestations : pronounced hypercytokinemia, other markers of systemic inflammatory response (SIR), coagulopathy, multiple organ failure (MOF), hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) distress, systemic tissue alteration. In general, these phenomena are directly and inversely related to systemic microcirculatory disturbances which determine the pathogenesis of distinct shock states. The aim of our study was to identify the features of SI phases in the development of two variants of septic shock, i.e., acute course (first week of the process) and prolonged/subacute sepsis (2 to 6 weeks from the onset of manifestations), as well as haemorrhagic shock studied 4-12 hours from the onset of massive blood loss. To verify the SI phases, we used the previously proposed SI scale, including the value of six SIR levels (RL-0-5), as well as additional criteria of SI, i.e., evaluation of clinical MOF grade (SOFA scale), plasma D-dimers ( 500 ng/mL), cortisol ( 1380 nmol/mL), tissue alteration markers, e.g., myoglobin ( 800 ng/mL) and/or troponin I ( 0.2 ng/mL). To calculate RL in SIR, plasma CRP and four cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF) were determined. The presence of SI was established if the SI scale exceeded 5 points (numerical RL values + presence of additional criteria, each equal to 1 point). The time and severity of the developing critical state, as well as the RL scores, were taken into account when reviewing the phases. There were three main SI phases: (1) evolving condition, (2) cytokine storm/phlogogenic hit (SD-4-5), and depressive (exhausting) phase. The latter was characterized by relatively low SIR values (RL-2-3). The lethality rate for shock in the presence of acute sepsis (n = 13) was 71.4%, reaching 94.1% in prolonged sepsis (n = 17). For haemorrhagic shock after massive blood loss, if not resolved within 24 hoursm the mortality rates was 53.8% (n = 13). Development of shock in acute sepsis, and haemorrhagic shock (within 4 to 12 hours after the onset of massive blood loss) is accompanied by the severity of critical-phase cytokine storm/PPS with a predominance of RL-5 in cases of lethal outcomes, and by a depression phase (RL-2-3) in prolonged sepsis. Overall mortality (for all groups) was 66.7% in the PS phase, 89.5% in the depressive phase and 15.4% in the evolvingl phase of haemorrhagic shock (with possible transition from this phase to the more critical SI phases until lethal outcome). Shock states of both septic and aseptic origin are based on a typical pathological process of SI, which should be distinguished from the signs of SIR characteristic of high-intensity canonical inflammation. It is characterized by higher cytokinemia (cytokine storm phase) or by the presence of additional SI phenomena with relatively moderate SIR levels (depressive SI phase). Thus, the depressive phase of SI is more fatal for disease outcome compared to the cytokine storm phase with higher intensity of SIR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脓毒性休克和出血性休克时全身性炎症的分期
不同来源的休克(感染性和无菌性)被认为是全身性炎症(SI)的临床表现,具有以下主要表现:明显的高细胞因子血症、其他全身性炎症反应(SIR)标志物、凝血功能障碍、多器官功能衰竭(MOF)、下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)窘迫、全身性组织改变。一般来说,这些现象与决定不同休克状态发病机制的系统微循环紊乱直接或负相关。我们研究的目的是确定感染性休克的两种变异发展中的SI阶段的特征,即急性病程(过程的第一周)和延长/亚急性脓毒症(从表现开始2至6周),以及从大量失血开始4-12小时研究的失血性休克。为了验证SI阶段,我们使用了先前提出的SI量表,包括6个SIR水平(RL-0-5)的值,以及SI的其他标准,即评估临床MOF等级(SOFA量表),血浆d -二聚体(500 ng/mL),皮质醇(1380 nmol/mL),组织改变标志物,例如肌红蛋白(800 ng/mL)和/或肌钙蛋白I (0.2 ng/mL)。为了计算SIR的RL,检测血浆CRP和4种细胞因子(IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、TNF)。如果SI量表超过5分(数值RL值+存在附加标准,每等于1分),则确定存在SI。在审查阶段时,考虑了发展临界状态的时间和严重程度以及RL分数。SI有三个主要阶段:(1)进化状态,(2)细胞因子风暴/促炎冲击(SD-4-5)和抑郁(耗尽)阶段。后者的特点是相对较低的SIR值(RL-2-3)。急性脓毒症患者休克致死率为71.4% (n = 13),延长脓毒症患者休克致死率为94.1% (n = 17)。大量失血后的失血性休克,如果在24小时内得不到解决,死亡率为53.8% (n = 13)。急性脓毒症和出血性休克(大量失血后4至12小时内)的休克发展伴随着致命结果的关键期细胞因子风暴/PPS的严重程度,以及长期脓毒症的抑郁期(RL-2-3)。总死亡率(所有组)在PS期为66.7%,在抑郁期为89.5%,在失血性休克的发展期为15.4%(可能从这一阶段过渡到更关键的SI期,直到致命的结果)。脓毒性和无菌性休克状态都是基于SI的典型病理过程,应与SIR的高强度典型炎症特征区分开来。其特征是较高的细胞因子血症(细胞因子风暴期)或存在额外的SI现象,SIR水平相对中等(抑郁SI期)。因此,与SIR强度较高的细胞因子风暴期相比,SI的抑郁期对疾病结局更致命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of pregnancy-specific β1-glycoprotein on the expression of arginase-1 and indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase by myeloid-derived suppressor cells TLR-9 (-1237)*T/C polymorphism in russian COVID-19 patients from the chelyabinsk region Studies on the hormone and cytokine producing function of human cumulus cells and its interrelation with fertility in polycystic ovarian syndrome T helper subsets during the acute post-traumatic period in children Cytokine profile in adolescent children with recurrent infections and polypous rhinosinusitis, ways of their correction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1