Understanding Heterogeneous Effects of Performance Management: An Application of Kroll’s Contingency Approach to Educational Accountability

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Perspectives on Public Management and Governance Pub Date : 2020-10-10 DOI:10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa019
Philip Gigliotti
{"title":"Understanding Heterogeneous Effects of Performance Management: An Application of Kroll’s Contingency Approach to Educational Accountability","authors":"Philip Gigliotti","doi":"10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Performance Management (PM) systems are intended to inform managerial decision-making, driving performance improvements through managerial reforms. Despite the prevalence of these systems, they were implemented with little evidence of the assumed relationship between PM and organizational performance. Since 2010, a literature on this relationship has developed, but it is heterogeneous and inconclusive. This review develops a theoretical framework of heterogeneous PM effects adapted from Kroll (2015, Public Performance & Management Review, 39, 7–32) and assesses it for consistency with empirical evidence from three cases of educational accountability reforms. This framework assumes that effects of PM systems are driven by the effectiveness of an organization’s managerial response, which is determined by adopting one of three strategies: prospecting, reacting, or gaming. The cases demonstrate that organizational strategy, as inferred from managerial response, predicts performance under accountability. This raises questions about how to predict managerial response, suggesting that managerial autonomy plays an important role.","PeriodicalId":29947,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Performance Management (PM) systems are intended to inform managerial decision-making, driving performance improvements through managerial reforms. Despite the prevalence of these systems, they were implemented with little evidence of the assumed relationship between PM and organizational performance. Since 2010, a literature on this relationship has developed, but it is heterogeneous and inconclusive. This review develops a theoretical framework of heterogeneous PM effects adapted from Kroll (2015, Public Performance & Management Review, 39, 7–32) and assesses it for consistency with empirical evidence from three cases of educational accountability reforms. This framework assumes that effects of PM systems are driven by the effectiveness of an organization’s managerial response, which is determined by adopting one of three strategies: prospecting, reacting, or gaming. The cases demonstrate that organizational strategy, as inferred from managerial response, predicts performance under accountability. This raises questions about how to predict managerial response, suggesting that managerial autonomy plays an important role.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解绩效管理的异质性效应:Kroll的权变方法在教育问责制中的应用
绩效管理(PM)系统旨在为管理决策提供信息,通过管理改革推动绩效改进。尽管这些系统很流行,但它们在实施时很少有证据表明项目管理与组织绩效之间存在假定的关系。自2010年以来,关于这种关系的文献有所发展,但它是异质的和不确定的。本文采用Kroll (2015, Public Performance & Management review, 39, 7-32)的理论框架构建了异质性项目管理效应,并对其与三个教育问责制改革案例的经验证据进行了一致性评估。该框架假设项目管理系统的效果是由组织管理响应的有效性驱动的,这是由采用以下三种策略之一决定的:勘探、反应或博弈。这些案例表明,从管理反应中推断出的组织战略预测了问责制下的绩效。这就提出了如何预测管理反应的问题,这表明管理自主权起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Not Whether to Coordinate, But How: Concerns and Mechanism Choice Under a Mandate for Inter-Agency Coordination What Is The Public? A Pragmatic Analysis of a Core Concept in Public Administration The Flawed Foundations of Social Equity in Public Administration: A Racial Contract Theory Critique The Procedural Politicking Tug of War: Law-Versus-Management Disputes in Contexts of Democratic Backsliding Producing Agreements and Innovations in Collaborative Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1