The Effect of Vitamin D treatment on COVID 19- Patients, an Inverted Propensity Score Weighting (IPSW), and Inverted Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) Analyzed Study

Jamal Wadi Al Ramahi, N. Hasan, A. Matar, Ma'en Maher Al-Ali, Lara Abdulhadi, Dania Abu Kaf, Waseem Saadeh, N. Hamdan, Hassan AbuKhalaf, M. Gharaibeh, Hanadi Hamadallah, Ala Bader, Mohammad Atout, Sae’ed Moh. Mar’I, Tamer Alhamed
{"title":"The Effect of Vitamin D treatment on COVID 19- Patients, an Inverted Propensity Score Weighting (IPSW), and Inverted Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) Analyzed Study","authors":"Jamal Wadi Al Ramahi, N. Hasan, A. Matar, Ma'en Maher Al-Ali, Lara Abdulhadi, Dania Abu Kaf, Waseem Saadeh, N. Hamdan, Hassan AbuKhalaf, M. Gharaibeh, Hanadi Hamadallah, Ala Bader, Mohammad Atout, Sae’ed Moh. Mar’I, Tamer Alhamed","doi":"10.3823/862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nVitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2 cholecalciferol) as a treatment for COVID 19 patients is being disputed, and a clear clinical benefit is not being confirmed.\nMethods\nA retrospective evaluation for COVID-19 patients who were treated with various cumulative doses of vitamin D. Data was extracted from the COVID-19 database, it included patients admitted to three hospitals in Amman, Jordan. Characteristics of patients were tabulated and compared for all-cohort, and propensity score index (PSI) adjustment, The comparison was based on two vitamin D strata ((≤ 149,000 i.u. and > 150,000 i.u.). Logistic regression analysis was utilized to predict recovery, the need for oxygen, and all-cause mortality for all-cohort, IPSW, and IPTW patients, based on vitamin D cumulative doses during their hospital stay.\nResults\n            1131 all-cohort and 768 PSI-adjusted patients were recruited. Except for antibiotics and antivirals, all other characteristics were balanced (P = NS). There were 1017 patients on vitamin D, 847 received cumulative ≤ 149,000 i.u., and 170 patients received cumulative dose ≥ 150,000 i.u. (Range 1000 – 385000). It was demonstrated that escalating cumulative doses of vitamin D did not contribute to the assessed outcomes; all-cohort patients (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000), IPSW (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000), and the IPTW (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000).\nConclusion\n            In our patients’ cohorts, we could not demonstrate a beneficial effect for vitamin D therapy in COVID-19 patients for recovery, the need for home oxygen, and all-cause mortality, by hospital discharge.","PeriodicalId":22518,"journal":{"name":"The International Arabic Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Arabic Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3823/862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Vitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2 cholecalciferol) as a treatment for COVID 19 patients is being disputed, and a clear clinical benefit is not being confirmed. Methods A retrospective evaluation for COVID-19 patients who were treated with various cumulative doses of vitamin D. Data was extracted from the COVID-19 database, it included patients admitted to three hospitals in Amman, Jordan. Characteristics of patients were tabulated and compared for all-cohort, and propensity score index (PSI) adjustment, The comparison was based on two vitamin D strata ((≤ 149,000 i.u. and > 150,000 i.u.). Logistic regression analysis was utilized to predict recovery, the need for oxygen, and all-cause mortality for all-cohort, IPSW, and IPTW patients, based on vitamin D cumulative doses during their hospital stay. Results             1131 all-cohort and 768 PSI-adjusted patients were recruited. Except for antibiotics and antivirals, all other characteristics were balanced (P = NS). There were 1017 patients on vitamin D, 847 received cumulative ≤ 149,000 i.u., and 170 patients received cumulative dose ≥ 150,000 i.u. (Range 1000 – 385000). It was demonstrated that escalating cumulative doses of vitamin D did not contribute to the assessed outcomes; all-cohort patients (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000), IPSW (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000), and the IPTW (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000). Conclusion             In our patients’ cohorts, we could not demonstrate a beneficial effect for vitamin D therapy in COVID-19 patients for recovery, the need for home oxygen, and all-cause mortality, by hospital discharge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维生素D治疗对COVID - 19患者的影响、倒倾向评分加权(IPSW)和倒治疗加权概率(IPTW)分析研究
维生素D3 (1,25(OH)2胆钙化醇)作为COVID - 19患者的治疗方法存在争议,其明确的临床益处尚未得到证实。方法对接受不同累积剂量维生素d治疗的COVID-19患者进行回顾性评价。数据提取自COVID-19数据库,包括约旦安曼三家医院的患者。将患者的特征表化并进行全队列比较,并调整倾向得分指数(PSI),比较基于两个维生素D阶层(≤149,000 iu和> 150,000 iu)。基于住院期间维生素D累积剂量,采用Logistic回归分析预测全队列、IPSW和IPTW患者的恢复、氧气需求和全因死亡率。结果共纳入1131例全队列患者和768例psi调整患者。除抗生素和抗病毒药物外,其他特征均平衡(P = NS)。1017例患者服用维生素D, 847例患者累计剂量≤14.9万iu, 170例患者累计剂量≥15万iu(范围1000 ~ 385000)。研究表明,不断增加的维生素D累积剂量与评估结果无关;全队列患者(OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000至1.000)、IPSW (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000至1.000)和IPTW (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000至1.000)。结论:在我们的患者队列中,我们无法证明维生素D治疗对COVID-19患者的康复、家庭吸氧需求和出院时的全因死亡率有有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibiogram of bacterial isolates from clinical specimens during 2018-2020 at Al-Aqsa hospital, Gaza, Palestine Impact Of COVID-19 Pandemic On The Pattern Of Azithromycin Prescribing; A Review Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern and Virulence Genes Detection in Citrobacter freundii Isolated from Patients of a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bangladesh Co-infection in patients with COVID-19 in Tripoli Northern Lebanon: germs involved and antibiotic sensitivity profile. Carbapenemase typing and resistance profile of Enterobacteriaceae with reduced sensitivity to carbapenems in a Middle Eastern tertiary care center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1