Technology Qualification: FMECA for Mitigating Potential Failure in Subsea Storage System

Mohd Azizul Hakim Zainal Abidin, A. Suleiman
{"title":"Technology Qualification: FMECA for Mitigating Potential Failure in Subsea Storage System","authors":"Mohd Azizul Hakim Zainal Abidin, A. Suleiman","doi":"10.4043/31608-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Subsea storage is one of main technology in \"Subsea Factory\" concept that could significantly lower down the field life cycle cost especially in subsea development. An established qualification approach should enable Project Management Team (PMT) to evaluate the technology maturity, aims to reduce significant availability impact during deployment and operational phase. This paper describes the qualification approach adopted to qualify the subsea storage technology to achieve technology readiness level (TRL) 4 as per API 17Q framework, prior to pilot testing at offshore installation. One of important step is to evaluates whether the subsystem and critical components of subsea storage has an impact on Design, Operations and Maintenance. In this context, the evaluation considers the credible failure mode, mechanism, cause, and effect in relation to Risk Priority Number (RPN).\n Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) has been applied to evaluate the subsystem and critical component. The higher RPN indicates that the susceptible subsystem and critical components require special attention for improvement. The results pointed out that material for both top and bottom centre pipe flanges should have an ability to operate in cyclical loading and suitable for inspection, maintenance, and replacement program.\n These results suggest that recommended method of FMECA can be adopted during TRL assessment. Focus also should be on unlisted components which are not part of this assessment including design adequacy and stringent quality assurance and control management system, operations integrity, and maintenance comprehensiveness.","PeriodicalId":11217,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31608-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subsea storage is one of main technology in "Subsea Factory" concept that could significantly lower down the field life cycle cost especially in subsea development. An established qualification approach should enable Project Management Team (PMT) to evaluate the technology maturity, aims to reduce significant availability impact during deployment and operational phase. This paper describes the qualification approach adopted to qualify the subsea storage technology to achieve technology readiness level (TRL) 4 as per API 17Q framework, prior to pilot testing at offshore installation. One of important step is to evaluates whether the subsystem and critical components of subsea storage has an impact on Design, Operations and Maintenance. In this context, the evaluation considers the credible failure mode, mechanism, cause, and effect in relation to Risk Priority Number (RPN). Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) has been applied to evaluate the subsystem and critical component. The higher RPN indicates that the susceptible subsystem and critical components require special attention for improvement. The results pointed out that material for both top and bottom centre pipe flanges should have an ability to operate in cyclical loading and suitable for inspection, maintenance, and replacement program. These results suggest that recommended method of FMECA can be adopted during TRL assessment. Focus also should be on unlisted components which are not part of this assessment including design adequacy and stringent quality assurance and control management system, operations integrity, and maintenance comprehensiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术鉴定:FMECA减轻海底储存系统潜在故障
海底储存是“海底工厂”概念中的主要技术之一,可以显著降低油田生命周期成本,特别是在海底开发中。既定的鉴定方法应该使项目管理团队(PMT)能够评估技术成熟度,旨在减少部署和操作阶段的重大可用性影响。本文描述了在海上安装试点测试之前,根据API 17Q框架对海底存储技术进行鉴定,以达到技术就绪级别(TRL) 4的认证方法。其中一个重要步骤是评估海底储能系统的子系统和关键组件是否对设计、运营和维护产生影响。在这种情况下,评估考虑与风险优先级数(RPN)相关的可信失效模式、机制、原因和影响。失效模式、影响和临界性分析(FMECA)被应用于子系统和关键部件的评估。RPN越高,说明易受影响的子系统和关键部件需要特别注意改进。结果表明,上下中心管法兰的材料应具有周期性加载能力,并适合于检查、维护和更换程序。结果表明,可采用FMECA推荐方法进行TRL评价。重点还应放在未列入本评估的部分,包括设计充分性和严格的质量保证和控制管理系统,操作完整性和维护全面性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Effective Framework of Integrated Development of Offshore Marginal Oilfields - Case Study of a Heavy Oil Reservoir with Thin Layers An Experimental Investigation into the Potential of a Green Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer Formulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Sandstone Reservoir World's First Arsenic in Condensate Removal for Oil & Gas Industry and its Universal Applications for Adsorption Facilities Digital Well Construction with Mud Motor Applications Coreflooding Experiments on PAM/PEI Polymer Gel for Water Control in High-Temperature and High-Pressure Conditions: With and Without Crossflow Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1