Student Social Media Self-Evaluation: Addressing the Posting Paradox in the Age of Cybervetting

J. Melton, Robert E. Miller, P. Dunn
{"title":"Student Social Media Self-Evaluation: Addressing the Posting Paradox in the Age of Cybervetting","authors":"J. Melton, Robert E. Miller, P. Dunn","doi":"10.1177/0047281620927014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cybervetting, or the review of job applicants’ social media accounts, is a common practice. This study investigates the use of a typology to increase students’ self-awareness by asking them to assess their social media presence. The majority of Facebook users concluded they post content that is appropriate for potential employers, while most Twitter users concluded they post questionable content. Yet most Facebook users restricted access to their accounts, while most Twitter users left them public. When subsequently asked about the prospect of changing posting behavior, students with questionable content were more open to change, supporting the potential viability of the typology.","PeriodicalId":93788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technical writing and communication","volume":"14 1","pages":"273 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technical writing and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620927014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cybervetting, or the review of job applicants’ social media accounts, is a common practice. This study investigates the use of a typology to increase students’ self-awareness by asking them to assess their social media presence. The majority of Facebook users concluded they post content that is appropriate for potential employers, while most Twitter users concluded they post questionable content. Yet most Facebook users restricted access to their accounts, while most Twitter users left them public. When subsequently asked about the prospect of changing posting behavior, students with questionable content were more open to change, supporting the potential viability of the typology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生社交媒体自我评价:解决网络审查时代的发帖悖论
网络审查,即审查求职者的社交媒体账户,是一种常见的做法。本研究通过要求学生评估自己在社交媒体上的表现,调查了使用类型学来提高学生自我意识的方法。大多数Facebook用户认为他们发布的内容适合潜在雇主,而大多数Twitter用户认为他们发布的内容有问题。然而,大多数Facebook用户限制访问他们的账户,而大多数Twitter用户则将其公开化。当随后被问及改变发布行为的前景时,内容有问题的学生更愿意改变,这支持了这种类型的潜在可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simply Effective? Simplified User Interfaces in Software Tutorials Improving ChatGPT's Competency in Generating Effective Business Communication Messages: Integrating Rhetorical Genre Analysis into Prompting Techniques Asking is Hard: Appeals Language in Kickstarter Crowdfunding Campaigns Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information Operations Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1