Evidence integration for coherent nexus policy design: a Mediterranean perspective on managing water-energy interactions

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2022.2049221
S. Giest, I. Mukherjee
{"title":"Evidence integration for coherent nexus policy design: a Mediterranean perspective on managing water-energy interactions","authors":"S. Giest, I. Mukherjee","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2049221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Nexus governance increasingly relies on using data to design policy measures. At the intersection of different policy fields, such as energy and water, data is seen to shed light on complex challenges and have the ability to measure both problems and solutions systematically. In order to analyze the challenges linked to data use in the context of nexus governance, we use a policy design lens and more specifically the perspective of organizational policy instruments to look at the Mediterranean region. We focus on how the design of organizational tools enables or impedes policy coherence and thereby the efficacy of data use. Addressing this question, we find that current efforts in the region largely satisfy one condition of coherence, which is coordination of different stakeholders, but lacks effective integration as the second component of achieving coherence. This implies that the organizational instruments outlined in the current context of the Mediterranean efforts are only a starting point for developments over time that require holistic thinking, strengthening coherence long-term as well as developing capabilities around nexus governance. Given these findings, we identify future research questions around the role of organizational policy instruments in contributing to the coordination of data-driven nexus policy mixes.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"9 1","pages":"553 - 567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2049221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nexus governance increasingly relies on using data to design policy measures. At the intersection of different policy fields, such as energy and water, data is seen to shed light on complex challenges and have the ability to measure both problems and solutions systematically. In order to analyze the challenges linked to data use in the context of nexus governance, we use a policy design lens and more specifically the perspective of organizational policy instruments to look at the Mediterranean region. We focus on how the design of organizational tools enables or impedes policy coherence and thereby the efficacy of data use. Addressing this question, we find that current efforts in the region largely satisfy one condition of coherence, which is coordination of different stakeholders, but lacks effective integration as the second component of achieving coherence. This implies that the organizational instruments outlined in the current context of the Mediterranean efforts are only a starting point for developments over time that require holistic thinking, strengthening coherence long-term as well as developing capabilities around nexus governance. Given these findings, we identify future research questions around the role of organizational policy instruments in contributing to the coordination of data-driven nexus policy mixes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连贯联系政策设计的证据整合:管理水-能源相互作用的地中海视角
Nexus治理越来越依赖于使用数据来设计政策措施。在能源和水等不同政策领域的交叉点,数据被认为能够揭示复杂的挑战,并有能力系统地衡量问题和解决方案。为了分析在关联治理背景下与数据使用相关的挑战,我们使用政策设计视角,更具体地说,使用组织政策工具的视角来研究地中海地区。我们重点关注组织工具的设计如何促进或阻碍政策一致性,从而提高数据使用的效率。针对这一问题,我们发现该地区目前的努力在很大程度上满足了一致性的一个条件,即不同利益相关者的协调,但缺乏作为实现一致性的第二个组成部分的有效整合。这意味着,在地中海努力的当前背景下概述的组织手段只是长期发展的起点,这些发展需要整体思维、加强长期一致性以及围绕联系治理发展能力。鉴于这些发现,我们确定了围绕组织政策工具在促进数据驱动的联系政策组合协调中的作用的未来研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Chiefs and floods: hybrid governance and co-production of flood risk adaptation in Tamale, Ghana. City-to-city learning: a synthesis and research agenda The nested hierarchy of urban vulnerability within land use policies fails to address climate injustices in Turkey Does multidimensional distance matter? Perceptions and acceptance of wind power Exploring the potential of city networks for climate: the case of urbact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1