The governmentality of tropical forests and sustainable food systems, and possibilities for post-2020 sustainability governance

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning Pub Date : 2022-06-13 DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082931
J. M. Smallwood, I. Delabre, S. Pinheiro Vergara, P. Rowhani
{"title":"The governmentality of tropical forests and sustainable food systems, and possibilities for post-2020 sustainability governance","authors":"J. M. Smallwood, I. Delabre, S. Pinheiro Vergara, P. Rowhani","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Continued conversion of tropical forests to agriculture risks jeopardising planetary integrity. The UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets to halt deforestation by 2020, alongside other global measures for zero deforestation, were not achieved. Applying a governmentality lens, we aim to better understand global governance mechanisms for tropical forests and sustainable food systems, and identify opportunities to improve them post 2020. We rely on data from global measures, institutions, and interviews with public and private actors working on tropical forest and food policy to undertake a discourse analysis of the (i) SDGs and other global measures on forests and food systems, (ii) contexts of the institutions studied, and (iii) implementation of global measures relating to forests and sustainable food systems. Our analysis reveals six discursive themes: (1) Policy framing of tropical forests – a token effort (2) Deceptive interlinkages, (3) Participation of the usual suspects, (4) Insufficient stakeholder representation, (5) Cleaning up supply chains and, (6) A green recovery. The themes show how the promotion and reproduction of neoliberal values of tropical forests consistently inhibit conservation, negatively impacting on planetary integrity. We identify opportunities to shift towards a new governmentality for informing international efforts on tackling tropical deforestation post-2020.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"8 1","pages":"103 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Continued conversion of tropical forests to agriculture risks jeopardising planetary integrity. The UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets to halt deforestation by 2020, alongside other global measures for zero deforestation, were not achieved. Applying a governmentality lens, we aim to better understand global governance mechanisms for tropical forests and sustainable food systems, and identify opportunities to improve them post 2020. We rely on data from global measures, institutions, and interviews with public and private actors working on tropical forest and food policy to undertake a discourse analysis of the (i) SDGs and other global measures on forests and food systems, (ii) contexts of the institutions studied, and (iii) implementation of global measures relating to forests and sustainable food systems. Our analysis reveals six discursive themes: (1) Policy framing of tropical forests – a token effort (2) Deceptive interlinkages, (3) Participation of the usual suspects, (4) Insufficient stakeholder representation, (5) Cleaning up supply chains and, (6) A green recovery. The themes show how the promotion and reproduction of neoliberal values of tropical forests consistently inhibit conservation, negatively impacting on planetary integrity. We identify opportunities to shift towards a new governmentality for informing international efforts on tackling tropical deforestation post-2020.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热带森林和可持续粮食系统的治理,以及2020年后可持续治理的可能性
持续将热带森林转化为农业可能会危及地球的完整性。联合国可持续发展目标(SDG)到2020年停止毁林的目标,以及其他全球零毁林措施,都没有实现。从治理的角度出发,我们的目标是更好地了解热带森林和可持续粮食系统的全球治理机制,并确定2020年后改善这些机制的机会。我们依靠来自全球措施、机构的数据,以及对从事热带森林和粮食政策工作的公共和私营行为体的访谈,对以下方面进行话语分析:(i)可持续发展目标和其他关于森林和粮食系统的全球措施,(ii)所研究机构的背景,以及(iii)与森林和可持续粮食系统有关的全球措施的实施。我们的分析揭示了六个话语主题:(1)热带森林的政策框架-象征性的努力;(2)欺骗性的相互联系;(3)通常嫌疑人的参与;(4)利益相关者代表性不足;(5)清理供应链;(6)绿色复苏。这些主题表明,热带森林新自由主义价值观的推广和再生产如何持续抑制保护,对地球完整性产生负面影响。我们确定了向新的治理方式转变的机会,为2020年后应对热带森林砍伐的国际努力提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Chiefs and floods: hybrid governance and co-production of flood risk adaptation in Tamale, Ghana. City-to-city learning: a synthesis and research agenda The nested hierarchy of urban vulnerability within land use policies fails to address climate injustices in Turkey Does multidimensional distance matter? Perceptions and acceptance of wind power Exploring the potential of city networks for climate: the case of urbact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1