Frances Power Cobbe and the Philosophy of Antivivisection

Alison Stone
{"title":"Frances Power Cobbe and the Philosophy of Antivivisection","authors":"Alison Stone","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Frances Power Cobbe led the Victorian movement against vivisection. Cobbe is often remembered for her animal welfare campaigning, but it is rarely recognized that she approached animal welfare as a moral philosopher. In this article, I examine the philosophical basis of Cobbe's antivivisectionism. I concentrate on her 1875 article \"The Moral Aspects of Vivisection,\" in which Cobbe first locates vivisection within the historical movement of Western civilization and the tendency for science to supersede religion and then endeavors to refute the defenses of vivisection one by one. I emphasize the philosophical considerations that led Cobbe to oppose animal experimentation on a reasoned basis.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"155 1","pages":"21 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Frances Power Cobbe led the Victorian movement against vivisection. Cobbe is often remembered for her animal welfare campaigning, but it is rarely recognized that she approached animal welfare as a moral philosopher. In this article, I examine the philosophical basis of Cobbe's antivivisectionism. I concentrate on her 1875 article "The Moral Aspects of Vivisection," in which Cobbe first locates vivisection within the historical movement of Western civilization and the tendency for science to supersede religion and then endeavors to refute the defenses of vivisection one by one. I emphasize the philosophical considerations that led Cobbe to oppose animal experimentation on a reasoned basis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弗朗西斯·鲍尔·科布和反活体解剖的哲学
摘要:弗朗西斯·鲍尔·科布领导了维多利亚时代反对活体解剖的运动。科布经常因为她的动物福利运动而被人们记住,但很少有人认识到她是作为一个道德哲学家来对待动物福利的。在这篇文章中,我考察了科布反活体解剖主义的哲学基础。我关注的是她1875年的文章《活体解剖的道德层面》,在这篇文章中,科布首先将活体解剖置于西方文明的历史运动和科学取代宗教的趋势之中,然后努力逐一驳斥活体解剖的辩护。我强调了导致科布在理性的基础上反对动物实验的哲学考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenomenology and Critical Hermeneutics of the “Livestock” Industry and Associated Sanctuaries Neglected Tropical Diseases and Long-Term Captive Animals: Ethical Considerations with Venom Lab Snakes Quality Management and Animal Welfare as Culture of Care for Animal Experiments under Biosafety Level-3, taking COVID-19 as a Practical Example Rejecting an Additive Solution to Regan’s Lifeboat Case Zoonoses in Unconventional Companion Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1