A Population Genetics Theory for piRNA-regulated Transposable Elements

Siddharth S. Tomar, A. Hua-Van, A. Le Rouzic
{"title":"A Population Genetics Theory for piRNA-regulated Transposable Elements","authors":"Siddharth S. Tomar, A. Hua-Van, A. Le Rouzic","doi":"10.1101/2022.07.05.498868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transposable elements (TEs) are self-reproducing selfish DNA sequences that can invade the genome of virtually all living species. Population genetics models have shown that TE copy numbers generally reach a limit, either because the transposition rate decreases with the number of copies (transposition regulation) or because TE copies are deleterious, and thus purged by natural selection. Yet, recent empirical discoveries suggest that TE regulation may mostly rely on piRNAs, which require a specific mutational event (the insertion of a TE copy in a piRNA cluster) to be activated — the so-called TE regulation ”trap model”. We derived new population genetics models accounting for this trap mechanism, and showed that the resulting equilibria differ substantially from previous expectations based on a transposition-selection equilibrium. We proposed three sub-models, depending on whether or not genomic TE copies and piRNA cluster TE copies are selectively neutral or deleterious, and we provide analytical expressions for maximum and equilibrium copy numbers, as well as cluster frequencies for all of them. In the full neutral model, the equilibrium is achieved when transposition is completely silenced, and this equilibrium does not depend on the transposition rate. When genomic TE copies are deleterious but not cluster TE copies, no long-term equilibrium is possible, and active TEs are eventually eliminated after an active incomplete invasion stage. When all TE copies are deleterious, a transposition-selection equilibrium exists, but the invasion dynamics is not monotonic, and the copy number peaks before decreasing. Mathematical predictions were in good agreement with numerical simulations, except when genetic drift and/or linkage disequilibrium dominates. Overall, the trap-model dynamics appeared to be substantially more stochastic and less repeatable than traditional regulation models.","PeriodicalId":72407,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.05.498868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) are self-reproducing selfish DNA sequences that can invade the genome of virtually all living species. Population genetics models have shown that TE copy numbers generally reach a limit, either because the transposition rate decreases with the number of copies (transposition regulation) or because TE copies are deleterious, and thus purged by natural selection. Yet, recent empirical discoveries suggest that TE regulation may mostly rely on piRNAs, which require a specific mutational event (the insertion of a TE copy in a piRNA cluster) to be activated — the so-called TE regulation ”trap model”. We derived new population genetics models accounting for this trap mechanism, and showed that the resulting equilibria differ substantially from previous expectations based on a transposition-selection equilibrium. We proposed three sub-models, depending on whether or not genomic TE copies and piRNA cluster TE copies are selectively neutral or deleterious, and we provide analytical expressions for maximum and equilibrium copy numbers, as well as cluster frequencies for all of them. In the full neutral model, the equilibrium is achieved when transposition is completely silenced, and this equilibrium does not depend on the transposition rate. When genomic TE copies are deleterious but not cluster TE copies, no long-term equilibrium is possible, and active TEs are eventually eliminated after an active incomplete invasion stage. When all TE copies are deleterious, a transposition-selection equilibrium exists, but the invasion dynamics is not monotonic, and the copy number peaks before decreasing. Mathematical predictions were in good agreement with numerical simulations, except when genetic drift and/or linkage disequilibrium dominates. Overall, the trap-model dynamics appeared to be substantially more stochastic and less repeatable than traditional regulation models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
pirna调控转座因子的群体遗传学理论
转座因子(te)是一种自我复制的自私DNA序列,它可以侵入几乎所有现存物种的基因组。群体遗传学模型表明,TE拷贝数通常达到一个极限,要么是因为转座率随着拷贝数的增加而降低(转座调节),要么是因为TE拷贝是有害的,因此被自然选择所清除。然而,最近的实证发现表明,TE调控可能主要依赖于piRNA,这需要一个特定的突变事件(在piRNA簇中插入一个TE拷贝)被激活,即所谓的TE调控“陷阱模型”。我们推导了新的群体遗传学模型来解释这种陷阱机制,并表明最终的均衡与先前基于转置选择均衡的预期有很大的不同。根据基因组TE拷贝和piRNA簇TE拷贝是选择性中性还是有害,我们提出了三个子模型,并提供了最大拷贝数和平衡拷贝数的解析表达式,以及所有这些子模型的簇频率。在完全中性模型中,当换位完全沉默时达到平衡,并且这种平衡不依赖于换位率。当基因组TE拷贝是有害的,而不是集群TE拷贝时,不可能有长期的平衡,活跃的TE在活跃的不完全侵袭阶段后最终被消除。当所有TE拷贝都是有害拷贝时,存在转位选择平衡,但入侵动力学不是单调的,拷贝数在下降之前达到峰值。除了遗传漂变和/或连锁不平衡占主导地位的情况外,数学预测与数值模拟非常吻合。总的来说,与传统的调节模型相比,陷阱模型动力学似乎更具随机性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Audiovisual cues must be predictable and win-paired to drive risky choice. High-resolution promoter interaction analysis implicates genes involved in the activation of Type 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells in autoimmune disease risk. Deriving genetic codes for molecular phenotypes from first principles. High frequency spike inference with particle Gibbs sampling. Spontaneous replication fork collapse regulates telomere length homeostasis in wild type yeast.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1