Risk Shifting Versus Risk Management—Canadian Pension Plan Liability Discount Rates

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 ECONOMICS Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques Pub Date : 2023-03-17 DOI:10.3138/cpp.2021-095
Sally Shen, S. Zernov
{"title":"Risk Shifting Versus Risk Management—Canadian Pension Plan Liability Discount Rates","authors":"Sally Shen, S. Zernov","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2021-095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Cet article étudie le choix des paramètres dans la conception du régime de retraite et dans les stratégies de placement en tenant compte de la règlementation et de l’organisation institutionnelle. Notre objectif est de déterminer si ces choix sont motivés par les préférences des participant·es au régime de retraite ou par la possibilité d’un transfert de risques injuste favorisé par une règlementation incitative aux effets pervers. Les résultats empiriques indiquent que les taux d’actualisation choisis par les régimes de retraite canadiens tant publics que privés reflètent les préférences en matière de risque plutôt que le cadre règlementaire ou les politiques incitativesAbstract:This paper studies the choice of parameters of the pension plan design and investment strategies in the context of the regulatory environment and their institutional organization. Our objective is to infer whether these choices are driven by preferences of the pension plan members or by opportunities for unfair risk transfers that are possible thanks to perverse regulatory incentives. Empirical findings indicate that discount rates chosen by both the Canadian public and private pension plans are a reflection of risk preferences rather than of regulatory structure or political incentives.","PeriodicalId":56148,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques","volume":"26 1","pages":"76 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2021-095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Cet article étudie le choix des paramètres dans la conception du régime de retraite et dans les stratégies de placement en tenant compte de la règlementation et de l’organisation institutionnelle. Notre objectif est de déterminer si ces choix sont motivés par les préférences des participant·es au régime de retraite ou par la possibilité d’un transfert de risques injuste favorisé par une règlementation incitative aux effets pervers. Les résultats empiriques indiquent que les taux d’actualisation choisis par les régimes de retraite canadiens tant publics que privés reflètent les préférences en matière de risque plutôt que le cadre règlementaire ou les politiques incitativesAbstract:This paper studies the choice of parameters of the pension plan design and investment strategies in the context of the regulatory environment and their institutional organization. Our objective is to infer whether these choices are driven by preferences of the pension plan members or by opportunities for unfair risk transfers that are possible thanks to perverse regulatory incentives. Empirical findings indicate that discount rates chosen by both the Canadian public and private pension plans are a reflection of risk preferences rather than of regulatory structure or political incentives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险转移与风险管理:加拿大养老金计划负债贴现率
摘要:本文从监管和制度组织的角度研究了养老金计划设计和投资策略的参数选择。我们的目的是确定这些选择是由养老金计划成员的偏好驱动的,还是由不公平的风险转移的可能性驱动的,而不公平的监管鼓励了不利的影响。实证结果表明,所选择的贴现率反映加拿大退休金计划的公共和私人风险偏好,而非政策监管框架或incitativesAbstract参数:the choice of This paper studies of the退休金计划(design and investment strategies in the context of the监管环境和其体制组织。我们的目的是了解这些选择是由养老金计划成员的偏好驱动的,还是由不公平风险转移的机会驱动的,而这种不公平风险转移是由于反常的监管激励而成为可能的。经验结果表明,加拿大公共和私人养恤金计划选择的贴现率反映的是风险偏好,而不是监管结构或政治激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Canadian Public Policy is Canada"s foremost journal examining economic and social policy. The aim of the journal is to stimulate research and discussion of public policy problems in Canada. It is directed at a wide readership including decision makers and advisers in business organizations and governments, and policy researchers in private institutions and universities. Because of the interdisciplinary nature of many public policy issues, the contents of each volume aim to be representative of various disciplines involved in public policy issues. This quarterly journal publishes interdisciplinary articles in English or French. Abstracts are provided in both languages.
期刊最新文献
Casinos as an Economic Development Strategy in the Prairie Provinces of Canada A Scientific Approach to Addressing Social Issues Using Administrative Data Child Penalties in Canada Two Decades of Poverty Reduction Politics in Canada: Better for Single-Parent Families and Single Working-Age Adults? Police Funding and Crime Rates in 20 of Canada's Largest Municipalities: A Longitudinal Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1