Prevalence of Infectious Diseases on Dairy Farms Classified on The Basis of Their Biosecurity Score

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.2478/jvetres-2022-0006
L. Perillo, G. Cascone, F. Antoci, G. Piccione, C. Giannetto, Rosario Salonia, F. Salina, E. Giudice, V. Monteverde, F. Licitra
{"title":"Prevalence of Infectious Diseases on Dairy Farms Classified on The Basis of Their Biosecurity Score","authors":"L. Perillo, G. Cascone, F. Antoci, G. Piccione, C. Giannetto, Rosario Salonia, F. Salina, E. Giudice, V. Monteverde, F. Licitra","doi":"10.2478/jvetres-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between biosecurity as scored on the Italian National Animal Welfare Reference Centre (Centro di Referenza Nazionale per il Benessere Animale – CReNBA) checklist and the prevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, Chlamydophila abortus and Neospora caninum on dairy farms located in Ragusa, Italy. Material and Methods The checklist was used to assign an animal welfare score to 31 dairy farms. Twenty-one farms with a moderate score (>33%, <66%) formed group 1, and 10 farms with a high score (>66%) were group 2. Blood samples were collected from all cows on each farm to investigate the titres of antibodies against the relevant pathogens. Two-way analysis of variance was applied to assess differences between the two experimental groups and the Mann–Whitney test was applied to evaluate prevalence differences in the tested parasites between the groups. Results All tested farms had a score that classified them as either good or excellent. A higher incidence of Neospora caninum was observed in group 1. The incidences of the other two parasites were no different between the two groups. Conclusion The CReNBA checklist represents an impartial, reproducible, functional and smart instrument based on risk analysis and assigns a farm a mathematical animal welfare score. Among the parasites tested for, only Neospora caninum had prevalence influenced by biosecurity. Our preliminary results highlighted the positive associations between good animal welfare, high levels of biosecurity, and the prevention of the infectious diseases caused by the parasites in our focus, which are common on dairy farms.","PeriodicalId":54685,"journal":{"name":"Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"103 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2022-0006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between biosecurity as scored on the Italian National Animal Welfare Reference Centre (Centro di Referenza Nazionale per il Benessere Animale – CReNBA) checklist and the prevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, Chlamydophila abortus and Neospora caninum on dairy farms located in Ragusa, Italy. Material and Methods The checklist was used to assign an animal welfare score to 31 dairy farms. Twenty-one farms with a moderate score (>33%, <66%) formed group 1, and 10 farms with a high score (>66%) were group 2. Blood samples were collected from all cows on each farm to investigate the titres of antibodies against the relevant pathogens. Two-way analysis of variance was applied to assess differences between the two experimental groups and the Mann–Whitney test was applied to evaluate prevalence differences in the tested parasites between the groups. Results All tested farms had a score that classified them as either good or excellent. A higher incidence of Neospora caninum was observed in group 1. The incidences of the other two parasites were no different between the two groups. Conclusion The CReNBA checklist represents an impartial, reproducible, functional and smart instrument based on risk analysis and assigns a farm a mathematical animal welfare score. Among the parasites tested for, only Neospora caninum had prevalence influenced by biosecurity. Our preliminary results highlighted the positive associations between good animal welfare, high levels of biosecurity, and the prevention of the infectious diseases caused by the parasites in our focus, which are common on dairy farms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于生物安全评分的奶牛场传染病流行情况分类
摘要简介本研究的目的是调查意大利国家动物福利参考中心(Centro di Referenza Nazionale per il Benessere Animale - CReNBA)检查表中生物安全性得分与鸟分枝杆菌亚种流行率之间的关系。在意大利拉古萨的奶牛场发现了副结核、流产衣原体和犬新孢子虫。材料与方法采用检查表对31家奶牛场进行动物福利评分。21个中等得分的农场(>33%,66%)为第2组。从每个农场的所有奶牛中采集血样,以调查针对相关病原体的抗体滴度。采用双向方差分析评价两实验组间的差异,采用Mann-Whitney检验评价两组间被测寄生虫患病率差异。结果所有受测农场的得分均为良好或优秀。第1组犬新孢子虫发病率较高。另外两种寄生虫的发病率在两组之间没有差异。结论CReNBA清单代表了一种基于风险分析的公正、可复制、功能和智能的工具,并为农场分配了一个数学动物福利评分。在检测的寄生虫中,只有犬新孢子虫受生物安全因素的影响。我们的初步结果强调了良好的动物福利、高水平的生物安全与预防由我们关注的寄生虫引起的传染病之间的正相关关系,这些疾病在奶牛场很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, is the official publication of the Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute. While it considers submissions from any geographic region, its focus is on Africa and the infectious and parasitic diseases and disease vectors that affect livestock and wildlife on the continent.
期刊最新文献
Antioxidant properties, anti-nutritive and toxic factors of Terminalia sericea in Onderstepoort. Antibiotic resistance and mitigation using One Health lens in aquaculture of Northern Nigeria. Rabies in equids in Sudan. Applied One Health: Nigeria National Veterinary Research Institute COVID-19 pandemic response. Factors associated with the rabies vaccination status of dogs in households in Beni City, D.R. Congo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1