Work-life balance: Does age matter?

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Cognition Technology & Work Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.3233/WOR-162435
Anita Richert-Kaźmierska, Katarzyna Stankiewicz
{"title":"Work-life balance: Does age matter?","authors":"Anita Richert-Kaźmierska, Katarzyna Stankiewicz","doi":"10.3233/WOR-162435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Work-life balance is a priority of EU policies but at the same time demographic change affects the labour market. Employers have to deal with the ageing of their employees and adjust human resource management to maintain their competitiveness. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the article is to answer research questions: whether the age of workers determines their assessment of the work-life balance, and whether there is a relationship between the worker's age and their assessment of the activities undertaken by their employer to provide them with work-life balance. METHODS The article is based on the results of surveys conducted among 500 employees of the SME sector from Finland, Lithuania and Sweden. RESULTS The results identified a statistically significant difference: employees representing older age groups are more likely to indicate the maintenance of WLB; older workers more frequently do not agree that all workers have equal opportunities to benefit from flexible solutions aimed at ensuring the maintenance of WLB. CONCLUSIONS The results can be the inspiration for the decisions and actions of employers in the field of personnel management and for creating workplace conditions encouraging senior workers to continue working, even upon becoming entitled to old-age pension.","PeriodicalId":49090,"journal":{"name":"Cognition Technology & Work","volume":"1 1","pages":"679-688"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition Technology & Work","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

BACKGROUND Work-life balance is a priority of EU policies but at the same time demographic change affects the labour market. Employers have to deal with the ageing of their employees and adjust human resource management to maintain their competitiveness. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the article is to answer research questions: whether the age of workers determines their assessment of the work-life balance, and whether there is a relationship between the worker's age and their assessment of the activities undertaken by their employer to provide them with work-life balance. METHODS The article is based on the results of surveys conducted among 500 employees of the SME sector from Finland, Lithuania and Sweden. RESULTS The results identified a statistically significant difference: employees representing older age groups are more likely to indicate the maintenance of WLB; older workers more frequently do not agree that all workers have equal opportunities to benefit from flexible solutions aimed at ensuring the maintenance of WLB. CONCLUSIONS The results can be the inspiration for the decisions and actions of employers in the field of personnel management and for creating workplace conditions encouraging senior workers to continue working, even upon becoming entitled to old-age pension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作与生活的平衡:年龄重要吗?
工作与生活的平衡是欧盟政策的优先事项,但与此同时,人口结构的变化也影响着劳动力市场。雇主必须面对雇员老化的问题,并调整人力资源管理,以维持竞争力。本文的目的是回答研究问题:工人的年龄是否决定了他们对工作与生活平衡的评估,以及工人的年龄与他们对雇主为他们提供工作与生活平衡而进行的活动的评估之间是否存在关系。方法本文基于对来自芬兰、立陶宛和瑞典的500名中小企业员工的调查结果。结果两组间存在显著的统计学差异:年龄较大的员工更倾向于维持工作负荷;年龄较大的工人往往不同意所有工人都有平等的机会从旨在确保维持工作平衡的灵活解决方案中受益。结论研究结果可以为用人单位在人事管理方面的决策和行动提供启示,并为创造鼓励老年职工继续工作的工作场所条件提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition Technology & Work
Cognition Technology & Work ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognition, Technology & Work focuses on the practical issues of human interaction with technology within the context of work and, in particular, how human cognition affects, and is affected by, work and working conditions. The aim is to publish research that normally resides on the borderline between people, technology, and organisations. Including how people use information technology, how experience and expertise develop through work, and how incidents and accidents are due to the interaction between individual, technical and organisational factors. The target is thus the study of people at work from a cognitive systems engineering and socio-technical systems perspective. The most relevant working contexts of interest to CTW are those where the impact of modern technologies on people at work is particularly important for the users involved as well as for the effects on the environment and plants. Modern society has come to depend on the safe and efficient functioning of a multitude of technological systems as diverse as industrial production, transportation, communication, supply of energy, information and materials, health and finance.
期刊最新文献
The effect of moderate broadband noise on cognitive performance: a systematic review Should prohibition signs always be designed as bar-over-pictogram in traffic and non-traffic contexts? Sustainable employability, technology acceptance and task performance in workers collaborating with cobots: a pilot study The dual impact of technological tools on health and technostress among older workers: an integrative literature review Influence of whole-body vibration on the cognitive ability of reasoning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1