{"title":"Historiestukken in zilver: penningen van Johannes Lutma junior","authors":"Dirk Jan Biemond","doi":"10.1163/18750176-90000195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History in silver : medals by Johannes Lutma the Younger. \nIn his theoretical discourse the seventeenth-century painter Joachim von Sandrart allocated a key role to the paragone : the interdependence of the different arts. He included several Dutch silversmiths in his pantheon as artists whose work engaged in a dialogue with the visual arts (note 3). \nThis article focuses on Johannes Lutma the Younger (1624-1689), who like his father of the same name was one of the leading Amsterdam silversmiths, artists who wre given a category of their own in guild documents. Around 1668 Joost van den Vondel placed the work of the Lutmas literally within the context of sculpture and painting, singling the son out for particular praise for his history pieces (notes 2 and 6). \nVondel's remarks can be assessed in detail with the aid of Lutma's medals. The one commemorating the Treaty of Westminster (c.1655) and the portrait of his father (1659) show the son in a dialogue with sculpture (figs. 16, 32 ). The same aspiration is evident in the portrait medals of Cornelis Witsen and Catharina Opcy (1669), for which the models were made around 1653 (figs. 37, 38). Painterly principles were deployed in the Breda peace medal (1669), the one marking the opening of the Stroobosser Canal (1654) and the marriage medals with the story of Isaac and Rebecca of around (figs. 20, 27, 39, 40). \nLutma's dialogues with painting can be associated with fairly modern currents in the Netherlands of the 1650s. The Stroobosser medal, for instance, recalls the Arcadian Dutch landscapes of his contemporary Nicolaas Berchem, while the design and execution of the medal with Isaac and Rebecca has echoes of Rembrandt' s mid-century history painting. Since works by those artists are mentioned in Lutma' s probate inventory (note 94), he clearly held them in high regard, so it is only logical to place his inventions in those visual traditions. His creations are autonomous interpretations. The relationship between the marriage medal and a history painting of a decade later by Gerbrandt van den Eeckhout is of a fundamentally different nature 8fig. 46). Eeckhout based the central composition on Lutma' s medal, possibly at the request of an as yet unidentified couple. \nSince the context of most of the above medals is known it is possible to outline the world in which the younger Lutma' s work functioned. It emerges that the historical medals for the city of Amsterdam were intended for an international public. Other categories played a part in the private sphere of the Amsterdam burgomasters and their immediate circle. \nPieter de Graeff and Cornelis Witsen awarded Lutma private commissions. Both men were deeply interested in medals and had costly collections with a strong international slant (notes 54, 111, 115, 116, 117; note 103). A precise and detailed picture is provided by an auction catalogue of an anonymous collector (notes 44, 85). In 1714 the collection contained no fewer than 1,106 modern medals in silver and gold, 519 of them Dutch and 587 European. Portrait and family medals were in a category of their own. This approach to collecting was international. In 1687, for instance, Pierre Bizot was able to write an illustrated survey of modern Dutch medals on the basis of French collections (notes 13, 14). \nThe descriptions in the auction catalogue are so detailed that several specimens can be identified. Since the catalogue included almost all the Lutma medals discussed here it is possible to associate his creations with international movements. The composition and execution of the \"Treaty of Westminster\" ties in with contemporary Italian examples, the medal of Lutma's father reflects the Italian and French custom of honouring versatile artists with a portrait medal. Occasionally there is an immediate reaction. The Breda medal is treated as the pendant of an earlier english one commemorating the same peace (fig.25). The different ways in which the superiority of the Dutch Republic was stressed in this medal elicited very sharp comments in the French and English press (note 82). \nThe resolutions and financial accounts of the city of Amsterdam provide an exceptional insight into the background to the making of medals, the editions, and the kind of sums involved (notes 17, 29, 57, 63, 68). The city council took the decision to have a medal made, acting on a proposal from the burgomasters. The treasurer (former burgomasters) composed the inscriptions, decided on the motto and supplied a design for the image. They also chose the artist and supervised the execution . Among those who oversaw the first medals was Cornelis de Graeff, the burgomaster largely responsible for the building of Amsterdam's new town hall, and in 1669 Nicolaas Pancras. They observed the international conventions as cited by Bizot in 1687. The inscription on the medal commemorates the event, while the motto and the image are an interpretation of it. \nLutma had a fair amount of freedom in the execution. In 1649, for example, the city council approved two desings it had received (figs. 2, 3, 4, 5). It can be deduced that the burgomasters intended the medals for their official contacts from the fact that they ordered far more than the 49 they actually needed (160 in 1649/1650), and around 100 in 1655). The astronomical sums they set aside for these projects testify to the importance they attached to the execution. The wage Lutma was paid is only known approximately, but in 1669 it was woughly 45 guilders per medal. \nSales and distribution were left to the medallist in order to keep costs down. That explains why there are also silver and bronze specimens of the Amsterdam peace medals, why the 1648 peace medal was already circulating among collectors before the official presentation in 1650 (fig.12), and why the design of a historical medal could be altered to make it suitable for other purposes. Famous medals like Lutma's were copied (figs.14, 15) and paraphrased (fig.43), so attributions have to be made with caution. They are only reliable if stylistic similarities are backed by the degree of finish and documentary evidence. \nThe medals display all the tecniques current in the Netherlands in the seventeenth century. The embossed ones include Munster, the Stroobosser Canal and the marriage medal with Isaac and Rebecca. It was a method that permitted nuances to be made in the finishing stage. Dies were cut for the Westminster and portrait medals (fig.18), which were then struck in silver. The Breda medal was screw-pressed (figs.23, 24), making it a remarkably early example, internationally as well as nationally, of this tecnique being used for a large format. Taken together they show that Lutma had mastered a wide range of techniques, which he varied depending on the result he was after.","PeriodicalId":39579,"journal":{"name":"OUD HOLLAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUD HOLLAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750176-90000195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
History in silver : medals by Johannes Lutma the Younger.
In his theoretical discourse the seventeenth-century painter Joachim von Sandrart allocated a key role to the paragone : the interdependence of the different arts. He included several Dutch silversmiths in his pantheon as artists whose work engaged in a dialogue with the visual arts (note 3).
This article focuses on Johannes Lutma the Younger (1624-1689), who like his father of the same name was one of the leading Amsterdam silversmiths, artists who wre given a category of their own in guild documents. Around 1668 Joost van den Vondel placed the work of the Lutmas literally within the context of sculpture and painting, singling the son out for particular praise for his history pieces (notes 2 and 6).
Vondel's remarks can be assessed in detail with the aid of Lutma's medals. The one commemorating the Treaty of Westminster (c.1655) and the portrait of his father (1659) show the son in a dialogue with sculpture (figs. 16, 32 ). The same aspiration is evident in the portrait medals of Cornelis Witsen and Catharina Opcy (1669), for which the models were made around 1653 (figs. 37, 38). Painterly principles were deployed in the Breda peace medal (1669), the one marking the opening of the Stroobosser Canal (1654) and the marriage medals with the story of Isaac and Rebecca of around (figs. 20, 27, 39, 40).
Lutma's dialogues with painting can be associated with fairly modern currents in the Netherlands of the 1650s. The Stroobosser medal, for instance, recalls the Arcadian Dutch landscapes of his contemporary Nicolaas Berchem, while the design and execution of the medal with Isaac and Rebecca has echoes of Rembrandt' s mid-century history painting. Since works by those artists are mentioned in Lutma' s probate inventory (note 94), he clearly held them in high regard, so it is only logical to place his inventions in those visual traditions. His creations are autonomous interpretations. The relationship between the marriage medal and a history painting of a decade later by Gerbrandt van den Eeckhout is of a fundamentally different nature 8fig. 46). Eeckhout based the central composition on Lutma' s medal, possibly at the request of an as yet unidentified couple.
Since the context of most of the above medals is known it is possible to outline the world in which the younger Lutma' s work functioned. It emerges that the historical medals for the city of Amsterdam were intended for an international public. Other categories played a part in the private sphere of the Amsterdam burgomasters and their immediate circle.
Pieter de Graeff and Cornelis Witsen awarded Lutma private commissions. Both men were deeply interested in medals and had costly collections with a strong international slant (notes 54, 111, 115, 116, 117; note 103). A precise and detailed picture is provided by an auction catalogue of an anonymous collector (notes 44, 85). In 1714 the collection contained no fewer than 1,106 modern medals in silver and gold, 519 of them Dutch and 587 European. Portrait and family medals were in a category of their own. This approach to collecting was international. In 1687, for instance, Pierre Bizot was able to write an illustrated survey of modern Dutch medals on the basis of French collections (notes 13, 14).
The descriptions in the auction catalogue are so detailed that several specimens can be identified. Since the catalogue included almost all the Lutma medals discussed here it is possible to associate his creations with international movements. The composition and execution of the "Treaty of Westminster" ties in with contemporary Italian examples, the medal of Lutma's father reflects the Italian and French custom of honouring versatile artists with a portrait medal. Occasionally there is an immediate reaction. The Breda medal is treated as the pendant of an earlier english one commemorating the same peace (fig.25). The different ways in which the superiority of the Dutch Republic was stressed in this medal elicited very sharp comments in the French and English press (note 82).
The resolutions and financial accounts of the city of Amsterdam provide an exceptional insight into the background to the making of medals, the editions, and the kind of sums involved (notes 17, 29, 57, 63, 68). The city council took the decision to have a medal made, acting on a proposal from the burgomasters. The treasurer (former burgomasters) composed the inscriptions, decided on the motto and supplied a design for the image. They also chose the artist and supervised the execution . Among those who oversaw the first medals was Cornelis de Graeff, the burgomaster largely responsible for the building of Amsterdam's new town hall, and in 1669 Nicolaas Pancras. They observed the international conventions as cited by Bizot in 1687. The inscription on the medal commemorates the event, while the motto and the image are an interpretation of it.
Lutma had a fair amount of freedom in the execution. In 1649, for example, the city council approved two desings it had received (figs. 2, 3, 4, 5). It can be deduced that the burgomasters intended the medals for their official contacts from the fact that they ordered far more than the 49 they actually needed (160 in 1649/1650), and around 100 in 1655). The astronomical sums they set aside for these projects testify to the importance they attached to the execution. The wage Lutma was paid is only known approximately, but in 1669 it was woughly 45 guilders per medal.
Sales and distribution were left to the medallist in order to keep costs down. That explains why there are also silver and bronze specimens of the Amsterdam peace medals, why the 1648 peace medal was already circulating among collectors before the official presentation in 1650 (fig.12), and why the design of a historical medal could be altered to make it suitable for other purposes. Famous medals like Lutma's were copied (figs.14, 15) and paraphrased (fig.43), so attributions have to be made with caution. They are only reliable if stylistic similarities are backed by the degree of finish and documentary evidence.
The medals display all the tecniques current in the Netherlands in the seventeenth century. The embossed ones include Munster, the Stroobosser Canal and the marriage medal with Isaac and Rebecca. It was a method that permitted nuances to be made in the finishing stage. Dies were cut for the Westminster and portrait medals (fig.18), which were then struck in silver. The Breda medal was screw-pressed (figs.23, 24), making it a remarkably early example, internationally as well as nationally, of this tecnique being used for a large format. Taken together they show that Lutma had mastered a wide range of techniques, which he varied depending on the result he was after.
白银的历史:小约翰内斯·卢特玛的奖牌。在他的理论论述中,十七世纪的画家约阿希姆·冯·桑德拉特(Joachim von Sandrart)为典范分配了一个关键角色:不同艺术的相互依存。他在他的万神殿中包括了几位荷兰银匠,作为艺术家,他们的作品与视觉艺术进行了对话(注3)。本文主要关注约翰内斯·卢特马(1624-1689),他和他的同名父亲一样是阿姆斯特丹领先的银匠之一,艺术家们在公会文件中被赋予了自己的类别。大约在1668年,Joost van den Vondel把Lutmas的作品放在雕塑和绘画的背景下,特别表扬了儿子的历史作品(注释2和6)。Vondel的评论可以通过Lutma的奖章来详细评估。纪念《威斯敏斯特条约》(约1655年)和他父亲的肖像(1659年)展示了儿子与雕塑的对话(图5)。16,32)。同样的愿望在科内利斯·威森和卡萨琳娜·奥普西的肖像勋章(1669)中也很明显,这些雕像的模型是在1653年左右制作的(图2)。37、38)。绘画的原则被运用在布雷达和平奖章(1669年),标志着斯特鲁博泽运河的开通(1654年)和婚姻奖章上,上面写着以撒和丽贝卡的故事。20,27,39,40)。卢特玛与绘画的对话可以与1650年代荷兰相当现代的潮流联系在一起。例如,斯特鲁博瑟的奖牌让人想起了他同时代的尼古拉斯·伯赫姆(Nicolaas Berchem)笔下的荷兰田园风光,而刻有艾萨克和丽贝卡的奖牌的设计和制作则让人想起了伦勃朗(Rembrandt)上世纪中叶的历史画。由于卢特玛的遗嘱清单(注94)中提到了这些艺术家的作品,他显然对他们很重视,所以把他的发明放在那些视觉传统中是合乎逻辑的。他的创作是自主的诠释。这枚结婚奖章与十年后格布兰特·范·登·埃克豪特的一幅历史画之间的关系有着根本不同的性质。46)。埃克豪特可能应一对身份不明的夫妇的要求,以卢特玛的奖章为中心构图。由于上述大多数奖章的背景是已知的,因此有可能勾勒出年轻的卢特玛工作所处的世界。人们发现,阿姆斯特丹的历史奖章是为国际公众设计的。其他类别在阿姆斯特丹市长及其直接圈子的私人领域发挥了作用。Pieter de Graeff和Cornelis Witsen授予Lutma私人委托。两人都对奖章非常感兴趣,收藏了大量具有强烈国际倾向的贵重物品(注54、111、115、116、117;请注意103)。一位匿名收藏家的拍卖目录提供了一幅精确而详细的图片(注释44、85)。1714年,收藏了不少于1106枚现代金银奖牌,其中519枚是荷兰的,587枚是欧洲的。肖像勋章和家庭勋章属于独立类别。这种收集方法是国际性的。例如,在1687年,皮埃尔·比佐(Pierre Bizot)在法国收藏的基础上撰写了一份现代荷兰勋章的插图调查(注释13,14)。拍卖目录上的描述如此详细,以至于有几个标本可以辨认出来。由于目录中几乎包括了这里讨论的所有卢特玛勋章,因此有可能将他的创作与国际运动联系起来。“威斯敏斯特条约”的构成和执行与当代意大利的例子有关,卢特玛父亲的奖章反映了意大利和法国用肖像奖章表彰多才多艺的艺术家的习俗。偶尔会有立即的反应。布雷达勋章被视为早期英国勋章的坠子,以纪念同样的和平(图25)。这枚奖章以不同的方式强调荷兰共和国的优越性,引起法国和英国新闻界非常尖锐的评论(注82)。阿姆斯特丹市的决议和财务账目提供了对奖牌制作背景、版本和涉及金额的独特见解(注释17、29、57、63、68)。市议会根据市长们的建议,决定制作一枚奖章。司库(前市长)撰写题词,决定座右铭,并提供了一个形象的设计。他们还选择艺术家并监督执行。第一批奖牌的监督者包括主要负责建造阿姆斯特丹新市政厅的市长科内利斯•德•格拉夫,以及1669年的尼古拉•潘克拉斯。他们遵守比佐在1687年引用的国际公约。奖牌上的铭文是为了纪念这一事件,而格言和图案则是对这一事件的诠释。 卢特玛在执行死刑时有相当大的自由。例如,1649年,市议会批准了收到的两份设计(图2)。从他们订购的数量远远超过实际需要的49枚(1649/1650年为160枚)和大约100枚(1655年为100枚)这一事实可以推断出,市长们打算为他们的官方联系人制作勋章。他们为这些项目拨出的天文数字证明了他们对执行的重视。卢特玛得到的报酬只有大概的数字,但在1669年,每枚奖牌的报酬大约是45荷兰盾。为了降低成本,销售和分销都留给了这位奖牌获得者。这就解释了为什么还有阿姆斯特丹和平奖章的银质和铜质标本,为什么1648年的和平奖章在1650年正式颁发之前就已经在收藏家之间流传了(图12),以及为什么历史奖章的设计可以改变,使其适合其他用途。像卢特玛这样著名的奖牌都是仿制的(图1)。14,15)和释义(图43),所以必须谨慎地做出归属。只有在文体相似性得到完成程度和书面证据的支持时,它们才是可靠的。这些奖牌展示了17世纪荷兰流行的所有技术。浮雕图案包括明斯特、斯特鲁博塞运河和以撒和丽贝卡的结婚奖章。这是一种允许在收尾阶段做出细微差别的方法。威斯敏斯特勋章和肖像勋章(图18)的模具被切割,然后用银铸造。布雷达勋章是用螺旋压制的(见图)。23,24),使其成为国际和国内将这种技术用于大幅面的一个非常早期的例子。综上所述,卢特玛掌握了广泛的技术,他根据自己所追求的结果进行了不同的调整。
OUD HOLLANDArts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍:
The periodical Oud Holland is the oldest surviving art-historical periodical in the world. Founded by A.D. de Vries and N. der Roever in 1883, it has appeared virtually without interruption ever since. It is entirely devoted to the visual arts in the Netherlands up to the mid-nineteenth century and has featured thousands of scholarly articles by Dutch and foreign authors, including numerous pioneering art-historical studies. Almost from the magazine’s inception, the publication of archival information concerning Dutch artists has played an important role. From 1885 to his death in 1946, the renowned art historian Dr. Abraham Bredius set a standard of excellence for Oud Holland.