Barnyardgrass control in conventional and Clearfield rice grown under intermittent flooding

Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1002/cft2.20246
R. Lee Atwill, Jason A. Bond, Jeffrey Gore, Drew M. Gholson, Tim Walker, G. Dave Spencer, Graham R. Oakley, D. Zach Reynolds, L. Jason Krutz
{"title":"Barnyardgrass control in conventional and Clearfield rice grown under intermittent flooding","authors":"R. Lee Atwill,&nbsp;Jason A. Bond,&nbsp;Jeffrey Gore,&nbsp;Drew M. Gholson,&nbsp;Tim Walker,&nbsp;G. Dave Spencer,&nbsp;Graham R. Oakley,&nbsp;D. Zach Reynolds,&nbsp;L. Jason Krutz","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the mid-southern United States, rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) is flooded primarily to suppress weed germination and growth. Two experiments were conducted to determine whether herbicide performance in conventional or Clearfield rice weed control programs was affected by intermittent flooding. The effects of flooding and herbicide program on barnyardgrass [<i>Echinochloa crus-galli</i> (L.) P. Beauv] control, rice grain yield, and water applied were investigated at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS, on Sharkey clay (very fine, smectitic, thermic Chromic Epiaquert). For herbicides commonly applied in conventional (clomazone, quinclorac, pendimethalin, thiobencarb, fenoxaprop-ethyl, cyhalofop-butyl, and bisypriboac sodium) or Clearfield rice weed control programs (imazethapyr plus bispyribac-sodium followed by imazethapyr, imazamox or bispyribac-sodium), intermittent flooding had no adverse effect on barnyardgrass control relative to a continuous flood. Moreover, initiating irrigation when the perched water table drops to 8 inches below the soil surface had no effect on rice grain yield and reduced water applied by 51%. Mid-southern US rice producers can capture the water-saving benefits of intermittent flooding while having no adverse effects on herbicide activity or crop productivity in conventional and Clearfield systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20246","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the mid-southern United States, rice (Oryza sativa L.) is flooded primarily to suppress weed germination and growth. Two experiments were conducted to determine whether herbicide performance in conventional or Clearfield rice weed control programs was affected by intermittent flooding. The effects of flooding and herbicide program on barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv] control, rice grain yield, and water applied were investigated at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS, on Sharkey clay (very fine, smectitic, thermic Chromic Epiaquert). For herbicides commonly applied in conventional (clomazone, quinclorac, pendimethalin, thiobencarb, fenoxaprop-ethyl, cyhalofop-butyl, and bisypriboac sodium) or Clearfield rice weed control programs (imazethapyr plus bispyribac-sodium followed by imazethapyr, imazamox or bispyribac-sodium), intermittent flooding had no adverse effect on barnyardgrass control relative to a continuous flood. Moreover, initiating irrigation when the perched water table drops to 8 inches below the soil surface had no effect on rice grain yield and reduced water applied by 51%. Mid-southern US rice producers can capture the water-saving benefits of intermittent flooding while having no adverse effects on herbicide activity or crop productivity in conventional and Clearfield systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
间断性淹水条件下常规稻和清水稻的稗草防治
在美国中南部,水稻(Oryza sativa L.)被淹主要是为了抑制杂草的发芽和生长。进行了两项试验,以确定间歇性洪水是否影响常规或Clearfield水稻杂草控制方案的除草剂性能。洪水和除草剂对稗草的影响[j]在密西西比州Stoneville的Delta研究和推广中心,在Sharkey粘土(非常细的、密散的、热致致色的Epiaquert)上研究了P. Beauv控制、稻米产量和水的施用。对于常规除草剂(氯马酮、喹诺酮、二甲甲烷、噻虫威、吡诺丙乙基、氟草酰丁基和双嘧菌酯钠)或稻田杂草控制方案(吡唑吡酯加双嘧菌酯钠,然后是吡唑吡酯、吡唑莫或双嘧菌酯钠)中常用的除草剂,相对于连续洪水,间歇性洪水对稗草的控制没有不利影响。此外,当悬空水位下降到土壤表面以下8英寸时开始灌溉对水稻产量没有影响,并减少了51%的需水量。美国中南部的水稻生产者可以获得间歇性洪水的节水效益,同时对传统和Clearfield系统的除草剂活性或作物生产力没有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1