首页 > 最新文献

Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management最新文献

英文 中文
Growers, consultants, and county agents perceive white-tailed deer to be the most economically impactful pest of Georgia cotton 种植者、顾问和县代理认为白尾鹿是对佐治亚州棉花经济影响最大的害虫
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70007
Lavesta C. Hand, Phillip M. Roberts, Sally Taylor
<p>White-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i> Zimmerman) are the predominant big game species pursued by hunters in North America. However, in the early 1900s, white-tailed deer were nearly hunted to extinction. Some of the earliest available data indicate that white-tailed deer populations ranged from 0 to 0.35 mi<sup>−2</sup> in 1950 in the Southeastern United States (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia), where populations had increased to 1.9 to 5.5 white-tailed deer mi<sup>−2</sup> in 2001 to 2005 in the same area (Hanberry & Hanberry, <span>2020</span>). A major goal in the wildlife profession has been increasing wildlife populations, which has been achieved (Conover et al., <span>2018</span>; Hanberry & Hanberry, <span>2020</span>). However, this can create issues for agricultural producers, with wildlife populations increasing to levels that have resulted in significant damage to crops (Conover et al., <span>2018</span>).</p><p>Upland cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.), on average, is planted on 11.7 million acres across the United States (USDA-NASS, <span>2024</span>). In the same 10-year span, Georgia consistently ranked second in cotton acreage, with approximately 1.2 million planted acres annually, which makes it the most widely planted row crop in Georgia (USDA-NASS, <span>2024</span>). Growers and extension personnel alike noted that deer damage to cotton was uniquely high in the 2023 growing season, particularly in southeastern states (Bain, <span>2023</span>; Gratas, <span>2023</span>). Reports in the literature of perceived impact of white-tailed deer on crop production are limited. Thus, a survey was distributed from September 2023 to March 2024 in Georgia to determine the perceived impact of white-tailed deer on cotton.</p><p>This survey was distributed to growers, University of Georgia County Extension Agents, and crop consultants, and they were asked about the following information: i) if deer are an economic problem in cotton; ii) annual cotton acreage (used to calculate acres represented in responses); iii) percent of cotton acres affected by deer; iv) percent yield loss observed on affected acres; v) dollars spent per affected acre on mitigation measures for deer damage on cotton; and vi) mitigation measures utilized (growers only). In total, 525 growers at 47 grower meetings responded representing approximately 449,821 acres (Table 1), 27 consultants responded representing approximately 352,625 acres, and 16 University of Georgia County Agents responded representing approximately 259,000 acres. Where appropriate, responses were compared to determine if perception was similar across groups utilizing two-tailed <i>t</i>-tests assuming equal variances, graphs were built, and standard errors were calculated using Sigmaplot 15.0 (Systat Software). Proportion data were analyzed using a beta distribution.</p><p>With respect
为制定针对每种害虫的管理计划都投入了大量资金,这些计划在及时实施的情况下效果显著。如果将白尾鹿影响的数据[(每英亩产量损失 + 每英亩管理成本) × 受影响英亩]进行推断,则表明种植者(152,645,492 美元)、顾问(139,563,108 美元)和县代理(151,417,461 美元)都认为白尾鹿是佐治亚州棉花的最大害虫。在缓解措施方面,大多数种植者表示,他们曾使用自然资源部的捕食许可证(70.6%)、重新种植棉花(64.2%)或施用驱虫剂(52.1%)来减少或应对白尾鹿的危害(图 5)。较少种植者表示他们曾使用围栏减少鹿害(11.7%),或表示他们采取了未列出的措施(14.4%),其中包括使用人工噪音制造者和稻草人等。此外,这项调查也是佐治亚州棉花白尾鹿研究的起点。未来的研究将评估白尾鹿在种植者田地里造成的合法产量损失、缓解措施的有效性和使用频率(尤其是驱虫剂)、鹿的觅食对棉花生长和成熟的影响以及许多其他目标。这些数据还有助于向利益相关者、政策制定者和其他方面宣传白尾鹿对棉花的影响,从而有可能增加用于种植者援助和相关研究的资金:构思;数据整理;正式分析;资金获取;调查;方法;项目管理;资源;软件;监督;验证;可视化;写作-原稿;写作-审阅和编辑。菲利普-罗伯茨(Phillip M. Roberts):概念化;数据整理;调查;方法;写作-审阅和编辑。莎莉-泰勒作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Growers, consultants, and county agents perceive white-tailed deer to be the most economically impactful pest of Georgia cotton","authors":"Lavesta C. Hand,&nbsp;Phillip M. Roberts,&nbsp;Sally Taylor","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70007","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;White-tailed deer (&lt;i&gt;Odocoileus virginianus&lt;/i&gt; Zimmerman) are the predominant big game species pursued by hunters in North America. However, in the early 1900s, white-tailed deer were nearly hunted to extinction. Some of the earliest available data indicate that white-tailed deer populations ranged from 0 to 0.35 mi&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt; in 1950 in the Southeastern United States (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia), where populations had increased to 1.9 to 5.5 white-tailed deer mi&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt; in 2001 to 2005 in the same area (Hanberry &amp; Hanberry, &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;). A major goal in the wildlife profession has been increasing wildlife populations, which has been achieved (Conover et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;; Hanberry &amp; Hanberry, &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;). However, this can create issues for agricultural producers, with wildlife populations increasing to levels that have resulted in significant damage to crops (Conover et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Upland cotton (&lt;i&gt;Gossypium hirsutum&lt;/i&gt; L.), on average, is planted on 11.7 million acres across the United States (USDA-NASS, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). In the same 10-year span, Georgia consistently ranked second in cotton acreage, with approximately 1.2 million planted acres annually, which makes it the most widely planted row crop in Georgia (USDA-NASS, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). Growers and extension personnel alike noted that deer damage to cotton was uniquely high in the 2023 growing season, particularly in southeastern states (Bain, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Gratas, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;). Reports in the literature of perceived impact of white-tailed deer on crop production are limited. Thus, a survey was distributed from September 2023 to March 2024 in Georgia to determine the perceived impact of white-tailed deer on cotton.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This survey was distributed to growers, University of Georgia County Extension Agents, and crop consultants, and they were asked about the following information: i) if deer are an economic problem in cotton; ii) annual cotton acreage (used to calculate acres represented in responses); iii) percent of cotton acres affected by deer; iv) percent yield loss observed on affected acres; v) dollars spent per affected acre on mitigation measures for deer damage on cotton; and vi) mitigation measures utilized (growers only). In total, 525 growers at 47 grower meetings responded representing approximately 449,821 acres (Table 1), 27 consultants responded representing approximately 352,625 acres, and 16 University of Georgia County Agents responded representing approximately 259,000 acres. Where appropriate, responses were compared to determine if perception was similar across groups utilizing two-tailed &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;-tests assuming equal variances, graphs were built, and standard errors were calculated using Sigmaplot 15.0 (Systat Software). Proportion data were analyzed using a beta distribution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With respect","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142439105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving nutritional values and yield in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars via foliar application of zinc and iron fertilizers 通过叶面喷施锌肥和铁肥提高蚕豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)栽培品种的营养价值和产量
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70004
Fitsum Merkeb, Tarekegn Yoseph, Berhanu Amsalu

Developing countries struggle to achieve food security due to a lack of superior crop cultivars, limited inputs, and environmental degradation. One way to deal with these issues is to biofortify with zinc- (Zn) and iron (Fe)-containing fertilizers to improve nutrient content and productivity. Thus, this study aims to assess the effect of foliar application of Zn and Fe fertilizers on various bean cultivars. Three cultivars (SAB-632, DAB-197, and BZ-2) combined with nine Zn- and Fe-containing fertilizers (T1 = 0, T2 = 0+1.5%, T3 = 0+3%, T4 = 0.5%+0, T5 = 0.5%+1.5%, T6 = 0.5%+3%, T7 = 1%+0, T8 = 1%+1.5%, and T9 = 1%+3%) were used as experimental treatments. The study utilized a split-plot design with a factorial arrangement and three replications, with cultivars on the main plot and fertilizer treatments on the sub-plots. The result revealed that T8 with the cultivar SAB-632 had a significantly higher (17.2%) grain Zn concentration than the control. The cultivar SAB-632 exhibited significantly higher Zn and Fe accumulations. Grain Zn and Fe accumulation were significantly enhanced by the foliar application of treatments, either individually or combined. T6 showed the highest accumulation of Zn and Fe, followed by T9. These values were increased by 33.4% and 29.2%, respectively, due to T6 compared to the control treatment. Additionally, applying these treatments to the leaves improved most agronomic parameters. Therefore, using foliar Zn + Fe fertilizers in bean cultivation can increase essential nutrient contents in grains and improve productivity, ensuring food security and nutrition for small-scale farmers.

由于缺乏优良作物品种、投入有限和环境退化,发展中国家在实现粮食安全方面举步维艰。解决这些问题的方法之一是使用含锌(Zn)和铁(Fe)的肥料进行生物强化,以提高养分含量和生产率。因此,本研究旨在评估叶面喷施锌肥和铁肥对各种豆类栽培品种的影响。三个栽培品种(SAB-632、DAB-197 和 BZ-2)与九种含锌和铁的肥料(T1 = 0、T2 = 0+1.5%、T3 = 0+3%、T4 = 0.5%+0、T5 = 0.5%+1.5%、T6 = 0.5%+3%、T7 = 1%+0、T8 = 1%+1.5%和 T9 = 1%+3%)组合在一起作为试验处理。该研究采用了阶乘设计和三次重复的分区设计,主区为栽培品种,分区为肥料处理。结果显示,种植 SAB-632 的 T8 谷物锌浓度(17.2%)明显高于对照。栽培品种 SAB-632 的锌和铁累积量明显高于对照。叶面施肥处理(无论是单独施肥还是联合施肥)显著提高了谷物锌和铁的积累。T6 的锌和铁累积量最高,其次是 T9。与对照处理相比,T6 的锌和铁累积量分别增加了 33.4% 和 29.2%。此外,对叶片进行这些处理还能改善大多数农艺参数。因此,在豆类种植中使用叶面锌肥和铁肥可以增加谷物中的必需营养成分含量,提高生产率,确保小规模农户的粮食安全和营养。
{"title":"Improving nutritional values and yield in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars via foliar application of zinc and iron fertilizers","authors":"Fitsum Merkeb,&nbsp;Tarekegn Yoseph,&nbsp;Berhanu Amsalu","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Developing countries struggle to achieve food security due to a lack of superior crop cultivars, limited inputs, and environmental degradation. One way to deal with these issues is to biofortify with zinc- (Zn) and iron (Fe)-containing fertilizers to improve nutrient content and productivity. Thus, this study aims to assess the effect of foliar application of Zn and Fe fertilizers on various bean cultivars. Three cultivars (SAB-632, DAB-197, and BZ-2) combined with nine Zn- and Fe-containing fertilizers (T1 = 0, T2 = 0+1.5%, T3 = 0+3%, T4 = 0.5%+0, T5 = 0.5%+1.5%, T6 = 0.5%+3%, T7 = 1%+0, T8 = 1%+1.5%, and T9 = 1%+3%) were used as experimental treatments. The study utilized a split-plot design with a factorial arrangement and three replications, with cultivars on the main plot and fertilizer treatments on the sub-plots. The result revealed that T8 with the cultivar SAB-632 had a significantly higher (17.2%) grain Zn concentration than the control. The cultivar SAB-632 exhibited significantly higher Zn and Fe accumulations. Grain Zn and Fe accumulation were significantly enhanced by the foliar application of treatments, either individually or combined. T6 showed the highest accumulation of Zn and Fe, followed by T9. These values were increased by 33.4% and 29.2%, respectively, due to T6 compared to the control treatment. Additionally, applying these treatments to the leaves improved most agronomic parameters. Therefore, using foliar Zn + Fe fertilizers in bean cultivation can increase essential nutrient contents in grains and improve productivity, ensuring food security and nutrition for small-scale farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142429918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soybean production and net revenue variability in an integrated crop–livestock system 作物-牲畜综合系统中的大豆产量和净收入变化
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70006
J. Brett Rushing, Joshua G. Maples, Kelsey M. Harvey, Johnson C. Lyles

The integration of grazing cover crops in combination with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production has the potential to increase total farm revenue. The objectives of this research were to determine the effect grazing had on subsequent soybean production and the economic implications of this practice. A field trial was conducted at the Coastal Plain Branch Experiment Station (CPBES) in Newton, MS, and the Prairie Research Unit (PRU) in Prairie, MS, from 2021 to 2023 to compare three cropping systems on two distinct soil types. Cropping systems included: conventional soybean (CS); no-till soybean + cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop (CC); and no-till soybean + grazed cereal rye cover crop (GC). Treatments were applied in a randomized complete block design with three replications at each location. Analysis was separated by location. Cover crop, soybean production, animal performance, and economic analysis were evaluated for each treatment. Soybean grain yield varied by treatment; GC (54.6 bu acre−1) was greater than CS (52.3 bu acre−1) at CPBES. At PRU, CS (68.5 bu acre−1) had greater soybean yield than all other treatments. Cover crop forage mass (FM) was 5077 lb acre−1 at CPBES, compared to 3094 lb acre−1 at PRU, resulting in subsequent cattle revenue of $593.64 and $160.29 acre−1 for CPBES and PRU, respectively. Soybean revenue was greatest for GC at CPBES ($691.78 acre−1) and CS at PRU ($867.89 acre−1). Net returns above production costs were greatest for GC at CPBES ($811.59 acre−1) and CS at PRU ($528.58 acre−1). Findings suggest grazing cereal rye cover crop has the potential to increase net returns in a no-till soybean system on coarse textured soils, but reduces soybean grain yield on heavy, poorly drained sites.

放牧覆盖作物与大豆 [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] 生产相结合,有可能增加农场总收入。本研究的目的是确定放牧对后续大豆生产的影响以及这种做法的经济意义。2021 年至 2023 年期间,在位于密歇根州牛顿市的沿海平原分部试验站 (CPBES) 和位于密歇根州草原市的草原研究单位 (PRU) 进行了一项田间试验,以比较两种不同土壤类型上的三种耕作制度。种植系统包括:传统大豆(CS);免耕大豆+黑麦(Secale cereale L.)覆盖作物(CC);免耕大豆+放牧黑麦覆盖作物(GC)。处理采用随机完全区组设计,每个地点三次重复。分析按地点进行。对每种处理的覆盖作物、大豆产量、动物表现和经济分析进行了评估。大豆谷物产量因处理而异;在 CPBES,GC(54.6 bu acre-1)高于 CS(52.3 bu acre-1)。在 PRU,CS(68.5 bu acre-1)的大豆产量高于所有其他处理。CPBES 和 PRU 的覆盖作物饲草量(FM)分别为 5077 磅/英亩-1 和 3094 磅/英亩-1,因此,CPBES 和 PRU 的养牛收益分别为 593.64 美元/英亩-1 和 160.29 美元/英亩-1。CPBES 的 GC 大豆收益最高(691.78 美元/英亩-1),PRU 的 CS 大豆收益最高(867.89 美元/英亩-1)。高于生产成本的净收益,CPBES 的 GC(811.59 美元/英亩-1)和 PRU 的 CS(528.58 美元/英亩-1)最高。研究结果表明,在质地较粗的土壤上,放牧黑麦覆盖作物有可能增加免耕大豆系统的净收益,但会降低重度排水不良地块的大豆产量。
{"title":"Soybean production and net revenue variability in an integrated crop–livestock system","authors":"J. Brett Rushing,&nbsp;Joshua G. Maples,&nbsp;Kelsey M. Harvey,&nbsp;Johnson C. Lyles","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The integration of grazing cover crops in combination with soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] production has the potential to increase total farm revenue. The objectives of this research were to determine the effect grazing had on subsequent soybean production and the economic implications of this practice. A field trial was conducted at the Coastal Plain Branch Experiment Station (CPBES) in Newton, MS, and the Prairie Research Unit (PRU) in Prairie, MS, from 2021 to 2023 to compare three cropping systems on two distinct soil types. Cropping systems included: conventional soybean (CS); no-till soybean + cereal rye (<i>Secale cereale</i> L.) cover crop (CC); and no-till soybean + grazed cereal rye cover crop (GC). Treatments were applied in a randomized complete block design with three replications at each location. Analysis was separated by location. Cover crop, soybean production, animal performance, and economic analysis were evaluated for each treatment. Soybean grain yield varied by treatment; GC (54.6 bu acre<sup>−1</sup>) was greater than CS (52.3 bu acre<sup>−1</sup>) at CPBES. At PRU, CS (68.5 bu acre<sup>−1</sup>) had greater soybean yield than all other treatments. Cover crop forage mass (FM) was 5077 lb acre<sup>−1</sup> at CPBES, compared to 3094 lb acre<sup>−1</sup> at PRU, resulting in subsequent cattle revenue of $593.64 and $160.29 acre<sup>−1</sup> for CPBES and PRU, respectively. Soybean revenue was greatest for GC at CPBES ($691.78 acre<sup>−1</sup>) and CS at PRU ($867.89 acre<sup>−1</sup>). Net returns above production costs were greatest for GC at CPBES ($811.59 acre<sup>−1</sup>) and CS at PRU ($528.58 acre<sup>−1</sup>). Findings suggest grazing cereal rye cover crop has the potential to increase net returns in a no-till soybean system on coarse textured soils, but reduces soybean grain yield on heavy, poorly drained sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142429275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
North Dakota corn efficiency frontier: Stochastic frontier analysis 北达科他州玉米效率前沿:随机前沿分析
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70005
Bayarbat Badarch, David C. Roberts, Michael P. Popp

According to climate studies in North Dakota, the state's crop-growing season has been extended. In addition, many studies have shown technological advances in crop production. However, the state has not addressed how crop yield has been affected by weather changes. Thus, this paper investigates the state's corn (Zea mays) yield potential and efficiency measures based on agricultural input use and weather variables from 1994 to 2018. We found that the effects of temperature and precipitation on the state's corn yield frontier (potential) were greater than those of changing agricultural input variables. The stochastic frontier model indicates that the proportion of the total variance attributable to inefficiencies or unexpected shifts in the corn yield frontier were primarily (81%) caused by favorable or unfavorable temperature and precipitation variations each year. At least half of the corn-producing districts were technically efficient, reaching at least 85% of yield potential from 1994 to 2018. Thus, better interannual weather forecasting and input use management taking weather risk management into account will bring higher corn yields for North Dakota farmers.

根据北达科他州的气候研究,该州的农作物种植季节已经延长。此外,许多研究还显示了作物生产技术的进步。然而,该州尚未解决作物产量如何受天气变化影响的问题。因此,本文根据 1994 年至 2018 年的农业投入使用情况和天气变量,研究了该州玉米(玉米)的产量潜力和效率措施。我们发现,气温和降水对该州玉米产量前沿(潜力)的影响大于农业投入变量变化的影响。随机前沿模型表明,玉米产量前沿的低效或意外移动占总变异的比例主要(81%)是由每年有利或不利的温度和降水变化造成的。从 1994 年到 2018 年,至少有一半的玉米产区在技术上是高效的,至少达到了产量潜力的 85%。因此,更好的跨年度天气预报和考虑天气风险管理的投入使用管理将为北达科他州农民带来更高的玉米产量。
{"title":"North Dakota corn efficiency frontier: Stochastic frontier analysis","authors":"Bayarbat Badarch,&nbsp;David C. Roberts,&nbsp;Michael P. Popp","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to climate studies in North Dakota, the state's crop-growing season has been extended. In addition, many studies have shown technological advances in crop production. However, the state has not addressed how crop yield has been affected by weather changes. Thus, this paper investigates the state's corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) yield potential and efficiency measures based on agricultural input use and weather variables from 1994 to 2018. We found that the effects of temperature and precipitation on the state's corn yield frontier (potential) were greater than those of changing agricultural input variables. The stochastic frontier model indicates that the proportion of the total variance attributable to inefficiencies or unexpected shifts in the corn yield frontier were primarily (81%) caused by favorable or unfavorable temperature and precipitation variations each year. At least half of the corn-producing districts were technically efficient, reaching at least 85% of yield potential from 1994 to 2018. Thus, better interannual weather forecasting and input use management taking weather risk management into account will bring higher corn yields for North Dakota farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142429418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation methods to estimate soft winter wheat grain yield in the Eastern United States 评估联邦作物保险公司估算美国东部软冬小麦谷物产量的方法
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70003
Laura E. Lindsey, Maninder P. Singh, Carrie A. Knott, Matthew W. Hankinson, Prabath Senanayaka Mudiyanselage, James H. Houx III, Mark Zarnstorff

Soft winter wheat (SWW) (Triticum aestivum L.) is vulnerable to environmental stressors throughout winter and early spring. To assess yield potential of SWW, crop insurance adjustors estimate grain yield by multiplying the number of stems ft−2 by a yield factor of 0.50. However, crop insurance adjustors believe the yield factor of 0.50 is too low. A 3-year experiment was conducted in Michigan, Ohio, and Kentucky to compare predicted SWW yield to harvested yield. The existing yield factor underestimated SWW yield in 243 out of 246 comparisons. Average predicted yield was 40 bu acre−1 (range of 6 to 122 bu acre−1) while actual yield averaged 93 bu acre−1 (range of 51 to 124 bu acre−1). Due to the discrepancy in predicted and actual yield, data from a planting date and seeding rate experiment conducted at four site-years in Ohio was used to establish a new yield factor based on the number of stems ft−2 and fractional green canopy cover (FGCC) measured with the Canopeo app at Feekes 5 growth stage. The new methods were applied to the original multi-state dataset. Using a logarithmic function based on the number of stems ft−2, 50% of the predicted yield values were within −8 to 18 bu acre−1 of the actual yield values. A logarithmic function based on FGCC resulted in 50% of the predicted yield values within 3 to 18 bu acre−1 of the actual yield values. Overall, our results showed that new models performed better than the current method used by crop insurance adjustors.

软冬小麦(SWW)(Triticum aestivum L.)在整个冬季和早春很容易受到环境压力的影响。为评估软冬小麦的产量潜力,农作物保险理算师通过将茎杆数英尺-2 乘以 0.50 的产量系数来估算谷物产量。然而,农作物保险理算师认为 0.50 的产量系数太低。在密歇根州、俄亥俄州和肯塔基州进行了一项为期 3 年的实验,将预测的 SWW 产量与收获产量进行比较。在 246 次比较中,现有产量系数有 243 次低估了西南风作物的产量。平均预测产量为 40 英布/英亩-1(范围在 6 到 122 英布/英亩-1 之间),而实际产量平均为 93 英布/英亩-1(范围在 51 到 124 英布/英亩-1 之间)。由于预测产量和实际产量之间存在差异,我们利用在俄亥俄州四个地点年进行的播种日期和播种率实验数据,根据茎杆数英尺-2 和在费克斯 5 号生长阶段使用 Canopeo 应用程序测量的绿色冠层覆盖率分数 (FGCC) 建立了新的产量系数。新方法适用于原始的多州数据集。使用基于茎杆数英尺-2 的对数函数,50% 的预测产量值与实际产量值的误差在 -8 至 18 蒲式耳英亩-1 之间。使用基于 FGCC 的对数函数,50% 的预测产量值与实际产量值的误差在 3 到 18 英布/英亩-1 之间。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,新模型比农作物保险理算员目前使用的方法效果更好。
{"title":"Evaluation of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation methods to estimate soft winter wheat grain yield in the Eastern United States","authors":"Laura E. Lindsey,&nbsp;Maninder P. Singh,&nbsp;Carrie A. Knott,&nbsp;Matthew W. Hankinson,&nbsp;Prabath Senanayaka Mudiyanselage,&nbsp;James H. Houx III,&nbsp;Mark Zarnstorff","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soft winter wheat (SWW) (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) is vulnerable to environmental stressors throughout winter and early spring. To assess yield potential of SWW, crop insurance adjustors estimate grain yield by multiplying the number of stems ft<sup>−2</sup> by a yield factor of 0.50. However, crop insurance adjustors believe the yield factor of 0.50 is too low. A 3-year experiment was conducted in Michigan, Ohio, and Kentucky to compare predicted SWW yield to harvested yield. The existing yield factor underestimated SWW yield in 243 out of 246 comparisons. Average predicted yield was 40 bu acre<sup>−1</sup> (range of 6 to 122 bu acre<sup>−1</sup>) while actual yield averaged 93 bu acre<sup>−1</sup> (range of 51 to 124 bu acre<sup>−1</sup>). Due to the discrepancy in predicted and actual yield, data from a planting date and seeding rate experiment conducted at four site-years in Ohio was used to establish a new yield factor based on the number of stems ft<sup>−2</sup> and fractional green canopy cover (FGCC) measured with the Canopeo app at Feekes 5 growth stage. The new methods were applied to the original multi-state dataset. Using a logarithmic function based on the number of stems ft<sup>−2</sup>, 50% of the predicted yield values were within −8 to 18 bu acre<sup>−1</sup> of the actual yield values. A logarithmic function based on FGCC resulted in 50% of the predicted yield values within 3 to 18 bu acre<sup>−1</sup> of the actual yield values. Overall, our results showed that new models performed better than the current method used by crop insurance adjustors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agronomic performance of soybean with varied planting dates, row configurations, and seeding rates on two different soil textures 两种不同土壤质地上不同播种日期、行列配置和播种率大豆的农艺表现
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70001
F. Read Kelly, Jason A. Bond, Corey J. Bryant, J. Trenton Irby, Don R. Cook, L. Jason Krutz

Planting date, row configuration, and seeding rate are three critical factors in obtaining maximum soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grain yield and can vary based on soil texture. Therefore, two studies were conducted at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS. The first study was conducted from 2019 to 2021 and sought to determine the effects of planting date (optimal and delayed 21 days), and row configuration (single-, twin-, and triple-row) on soybean growth, development, and grain yield. The second study was conducted in 2021 with three site-years to determine the effects of seeding rate (130,000, 180,000, and 220,000 seeds acre−1) in a triple-row configuration on soybean grain yield compared to a single-row configuration at 130,000 seeds acre−1 on two soil textures (silt loam and clay). Both studies were repeated on silt loam and clay soil textures in every site-year. In the first study, the optimal planting date increased soybean grain yield regardless of soil texture. On both soil textures, twin- and single-row configuration yields were equivalent, but triple-row configuration reduced soybean grain yield up to 9%. Similarly, triple-row configuration reduced soybean density and height at R3 and R8 growth stages. In the second study, increasing triple-row configuration soybean seeding rate by at least 38% provided similar soybean grain yields to a single-row configuration at 130,000 seeds acre−1. These data indicate that triple-row soybean planting configurations do have some benefits, but that future research should focus on equipment limitations experienced in the current research.

播种日期、行配置和播种率是获得最大大豆 [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] 谷物产量的三个关键因素,它们会因土壤质地而异。因此,在位于密歇根州斯通维尔的三角洲研究与推广中心进行了两项研究。第一项研究于 2019 年至 2021 年进行,旨在确定播种日期(最佳和延迟 21 天)和行配置(单行、双行和三行)对大豆生长、发育和谷物产量的影响。第二项研究于 2021 年进行,共分三个地点年,目的是确定在两种土壤质地(淤泥质壤土和粘土)上,三行配置(每英亩 13 万粒种子、18 万粒种子和 22 万粒种子)与单行配置(每英亩 13 万粒种子)相比,对大豆籽粒产量的影响。这两项研究在每个地点年都会在淤泥质壤土和粘土质地上重复进行。在第一项研究中,无论土壤质地如何,最佳播种日期都能提高大豆产量。在这两种土壤质地上,双行和单行配置的产量相当,但三行配置的大豆籽粒产量减少达 9%。同样,在 R3 和 R8 生长阶段,三行配置降低了大豆密度和高度。在第二项研究中,将三行配置大豆播种率提高至少 38%,可获得与单行配置(13 万粒/英亩-1)相似的大豆籽粒产量。这些数据表明,三行大豆种植配置确实有一些好处,但未来的研究应重点关注当前研究中遇到的设备限制。
{"title":"Agronomic performance of soybean with varied planting dates, row configurations, and seeding rates on two different soil textures","authors":"F. Read Kelly,&nbsp;Jason A. Bond,&nbsp;Corey J. Bryant,&nbsp;J. Trenton Irby,&nbsp;Don R. Cook,&nbsp;L. Jason Krutz","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Planting date, row configuration, and seeding rate are three critical factors in obtaining maximum soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] grain yield and can vary based on soil texture. Therefore, two studies were conducted at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS. The first study was conducted from 2019 to 2021 and sought to determine the effects of planting date (optimal and delayed 21 days), and row configuration (single-, twin-, and triple-row) on soybean growth, development, and grain yield. The second study was conducted in 2021 with three site-years to determine the effects of seeding rate (130,000, 180,000, and 220,000 seeds acre<sup>−1</sup>) in a triple-row configuration on soybean grain yield compared to a single-row configuration at 130,000 seeds acre<sup>−1</sup> on two soil textures (silt loam and clay). Both studies were repeated on silt loam and clay soil textures in every site-year. In the first study, the optimal planting date increased soybean grain yield regardless of soil texture. On both soil textures, twin- and single-row configuration yields were equivalent, but triple-row configuration reduced soybean grain yield up to 9%. Similarly, triple-row configuration reduced soybean density and height at R3 and R8 growth stages. In the second study, increasing triple-row configuration soybean seeding rate by at least 38% provided similar soybean grain yields to a single-row configuration at 130,000 seeds acre<sup>−1</sup>. These data indicate that triple-row soybean planting configurations do have some benefits, but that future research should focus on equipment limitations experienced in the current research.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endophyte effects on drought tolerance of turf-type tall fescue 内生菌对草皮型高羊茅耐旱性的影响
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20310
Paige E. Boyle, Michael D. Richardson, Douglas E. Karcher, Kenneth W. Hignight, Debra Hignight, Margaret E. Secks

The response of tall fescue [Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.], infected with fungal endophytes, and subjected to drought stress has varied, presumably due to variability in host–endophyte associations. Much of this research has focused on forage ecotypes; less is known about the effects of endophytes on managed turfgrasses. The objective of these trials was to determine if the presence of fungal endophytes in turf-type tall fescue provides an advantage to the host grass when exposed to drought conditions. Five endophyte-free and endophyte-infected field populations were established in Fayetteville, AR, and Albany, OR. A greenhouse trial was also established in Albany. Turf was subjected to drought and lightbox photos were evaluated to determine days until 75%, 50%, and 25% green cover. Overall, endophyte infection had no consistent effect on the drought response of tall fescue. Although there was no effect on drought response, endophyte infection in turf may confer other benefits, and may still be a valuable tool for turfgrass management.

高羊茅[Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.]感染真菌内生体后对干旱胁迫的反应各不相同,这可能是由于宿主与内生体之间的关联存在差异。大部分研究都集中在牧草生态型上,而内生真菌对草坪草管理的影响则知之甚少。这些试验的目的是确定在干旱条件下,草坪型高羊茅的真菌内生菌是否会给宿主草带来优势。在阿肯色州费耶特维尔和俄勒冈州奥尔巴尼建立了五个无内生真菌和受内生真菌感染的田间种群。还在奥尔巴尼进行了温室试验。草坪受到干旱的影响,并通过灯箱照片进行评估,以确定绿色覆盖率达到 75%、50% 和 25% 的天数。总的来说,内生菌感染对高羊茅的干旱反应没有一致的影响。虽然对干旱反应没有影响,但内生菌感染草坪可能会带来其他益处,仍可能是草坪管理的一种有价值的工具。
{"title":"Endophyte effects on drought tolerance of turf-type tall fescue","authors":"Paige E. Boyle,&nbsp;Michael D. Richardson,&nbsp;Douglas E. Karcher,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Hignight,&nbsp;Debra Hignight,&nbsp;Margaret E. Secks","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20310","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The response of tall fescue [<i>Schedonorus arundinaceus</i> (Schreb.) Dumort.], infected with fungal endophytes, and subjected to drought stress has varied, presumably due to variability in host–endophyte associations. Much of this research has focused on forage ecotypes; less is known about the effects of endophytes on managed turfgrasses. The objective of these trials was to determine if the presence of fungal endophytes in turf-type tall fescue provides an advantage to the host grass when exposed to drought conditions. Five endophyte-free and endophyte-infected field populations were established in Fayetteville, AR, and Albany, OR. A greenhouse trial was also established in Albany. Turf was subjected to drought and lightbox photos were evaluated to determine days until 75%, 50%, and 25% green cover. Overall, endophyte infection had no consistent effect on the drought response of tall fescue. Although there was no effect on drought response, endophyte infection in turf may confer other benefits, and may still be a valuable tool for turfgrass management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142273092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of fungicide on soybean seed quality from delayed harvest and environment 杀菌剂对延迟收获和环境造成的大豆种子质量的影响
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70002
Donnie K. Miller, Priscilla Campos, Josh T. Copes, Melanie Netterville, Sebe Brown, Paul P. Price, David O. Moseley, Thanos Genetimis, Peters Egbedi, Muhammad Rasel Parvej

Field studies in 2019–2020 evaluated the influence of fungicide application on seed quality from delayed harvest (approx. 20, 30, and 44 days after optimum harvest timing, i.e., 13% seed moisture). Treatments included nofungicide, pydiflumetofen plus difenoconazole (13.7 fl oz/acre Miravis Top, Syngenta), or mefentrifluconazole plus pyraclostrobin plus fluxapyroxad (8 fl oz/acre Revytek, BASF). Effect of environment was investigated in both field (natural rainfall events) and environmentally controlled growth chambers (79°F or 90°F with 30% or 100% relative humidity and exposed for 48 or 96 h) for potential impacts on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] seed quality. Seed quality was based on a rating scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being seeds in good condition and 10 being seeds in poor condition, based on USDA reference images. Fungicide application had no effect on seed quality from delayed harvest or a saturated environment (100% relative humidity). Delaying harvest beyond approximately 20 days past optimum timing can result in reduced seed quality regardless of fungicide application (1.0 to 2.0 vs 4.0 to 8.1 rating). In addition, seedpod exposure averaged across temperature and relative humidity environments for as little as 96 h after optimum harvest timing can result in deteriorating seed quality issues (3.2 vs 1.4 rating) regardless of fungicide application. Results indicate that soybean harvest delayed 20 days after optimum timing and subjected to seasonal rainfall events or seedpods exposed to completely saturated conditions for 96 h associated with a tropical weather event will result in soybean seed quality deterioration regardless of fungicide application.

2019-2020 年的田间研究评估了施用杀菌剂对延迟收获(最佳收获期后约 20、30 和 44 天,即种子水分 13%)种子质量的影响。处理包括杀菌剂、吡氟醚菌酯加苯醚甲环唑(13.7 液量盎司/英亩 Miravis Top,先正达公司)或甲氰氟唑加吡唑醚菌酯加氟嘧磺隆(8 液量盎司/英亩 Revytek,巴斯夫公司)。在田间(自然降雨事件)和环境控制生长室(79°F 或 90°F,相对湿度为 30% 或 100%,暴露 48 或 96 小时)中研究了环境对大豆[Glycine max (L.) Merr.]种子质量的潜在影响。根据美国农业部的参考图片,种子质量的评分标准为 1 到 10 分,1 分代表种子状况良好,10 分代表种子状况不佳。施用杀真菌剂对延迟收获或饱和环境(相对湿度 100%)下的种子质量没有影响。无论是否施用杀真菌剂,将收获时间推迟到最佳时间之后约 20 天都会导致种子质量下降(1.0 至 2.0 对 4.0 至 8.1 分)。此外,在最佳收获期后的 96 小时内,平均温度和相对湿度环境下的种球暴露会导致种子质量下降(3.2 对 1.4 分),无论是否施用杀真菌剂。结果表明,大豆收获期比最佳收获期推迟 20 天,并受到季节性降雨事件的影响,或种球暴露在与热带气候事件相关的完全饱和的环境中 96 小时,都会导致大豆种子质量下降,无论是否施用杀真菌剂。
{"title":"Influence of fungicide on soybean seed quality from delayed harvest and environment","authors":"Donnie K. Miller,&nbsp;Priscilla Campos,&nbsp;Josh T. Copes,&nbsp;Melanie Netterville,&nbsp;Sebe Brown,&nbsp;Paul P. Price,&nbsp;David O. Moseley,&nbsp;Thanos Genetimis,&nbsp;Peters Egbedi,&nbsp;Muhammad Rasel Parvej","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field studies in 2019–2020 evaluated the influence of fungicide application on seed quality from delayed harvest (approx. 20, 30, and 44 days after optimum harvest timing, i.e., 13% seed moisture). Treatments included nofungicide, pydiflumetofen plus difenoconazole (13.7 fl oz/acre Miravis Top, Syngenta), or mefentrifluconazole plus pyraclostrobin plus fluxapyroxad (8 fl oz/acre Revytek, BASF). Effect of environment was investigated in both field (natural rainfall events) and environmentally controlled growth chambers (79°F or 90°F with 30% or 100% relative humidity and exposed for 48 or 96 h) for potential impacts on soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] seed quality. Seed quality was based on a rating scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being seeds in good condition and 10 being seeds in poor condition, based on USDA reference images. Fungicide application had no effect on seed quality from delayed harvest or a saturated environment (100% relative humidity). Delaying harvest beyond approximately 20 days past optimum timing can result in reduced seed quality regardless of fungicide application (1.0 to 2.0 vs 4.0 to 8.1 rating). In addition, seedpod exposure averaged across temperature and relative humidity environments for as little as 96 h after optimum harvest timing can result in deteriorating seed quality issues (3.2 vs 1.4 rating) regardless of fungicide application. Results indicate that soybean harvest delayed 20 days after optimum timing and subjected to seasonal rainfall events or seedpods exposed to completely saturated conditions for 96 h associated with a tropical weather event will result in soybean seed quality deterioration regardless of fungicide application.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142233213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peanut cultivar response to residual soil test potassium in North Mississippi 北密西西比州花生栽培品种对土壤测试残留钾的反应
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20312
Brendan Zurweller, Yangyang Song, Andrew Dygert, Jac Varco, Bryan Whittenton, Justin May, Brad Burgess

The average U.S. peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield has increased by approximately 25% with the adoption of peanut cultivar ‘Georgia-06G’. Since this adoption, many new high yielding runner cultivars with similar yield potential have been released. However, current nutrient recommendations are based on soil tests that were developed prior to the release of Georgia-06G. Particularly for potassium, current soil test potassium (STK) critical values were established on soil textures with relatively low cation exchange capacity (CEC) but were not validated on soil textures with high CEC. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and yield response of five recently released peanut cultivars to four STK levels ranging from very low to medium based on Mississippi State University Extension soil testing recommendations. The STK classification levels were also based on two soil series categorized with high CEC—Leeper (∼38.4 meq 100 g−1) and Marietta (∼15.9 meq 100 g−1) soil series. Cultivars Georgia-06G, ‘Georgia-16HO’, ‘Georgia-18RU’, FloRun ‘331’, and ‘AU-NPL-17’ were evaluated in this study. No STK × variety interaction occurred, indicating similar K requirements across all varieties evaluated. However, a positive pod yield response occurred in both soil types when the average STK increased from 128 to 167 lbs ac−1 for all cultivars and site years. Critical STK values on both soils were greater than many current Extension recommendations, and the critical STK value of Leeper is greater than the Marietta soil series, likely due to the higher CEC value. These results demonstrate the need to adjust peanut STK sufficiency levels based on soil CEC. Further evaluation of modern peanut cultivar productivity response to STK sufficiency levels is needed for soils with moderate CEC.

随着花生栽培品种 "Georgia-06G "的采用,美国花生(Arachis hypogaea L.)的平均产量提高了约 25%。自采用该品种以来,许多具有类似产量潜力的新高产匍匐茎栽培品种相继问世。然而,目前的养分建议是基于 Georgia-06G 推出之前的土壤测试结果。尤其是钾,目前的土壤测试钾(STK)临界值是在阳离子交换容量(CEC)相对较低的土壤质地上确定的,但没有在阳离子交换容量较高的土壤质地上进行验证。本研究旨在根据密西西比州立大学推广部的土壤测试建议,评估五个新近发布的花生栽培品种对从极低到中等四个 STK 水平的生长和产量反应。STK 分级还基于两个被归类为高 CEC 的土壤系列--Leeper(∼38.4 meq 100 g-1)和 Marietta(∼15.9 meq 100 g-1)土壤系列。本研究评估了 "Georgia-06G"、"Georgia-16HO"、"Georgia-18RU"、FloRun "331 "和 "AU-NPL-17 "等品种。STK × 品种之间没有相互作用,这表明所有评估品种对钾的需求量相似。然而,当所有栽培品种和地点年份的平均 STK 从 128 磅/英亩-1 增加到 167 磅/英亩-1 时,两种土壤类型的豆荚产量都出现了正反应。两种土壤的 STK 临界值都高于许多现行的推广建议,Leeper 土壤的 STK 临界值高于 Marietta 土壤系列,这可能是由于 CEC 值较高。这些结果表明,有必要根据土壤的 CEC 值调整花生 STK 的充足水平。对于具有中等 CEC 的土壤,需要进一步评估现代花生栽培品种的生产力对 STK 充足水平的响应。
{"title":"Peanut cultivar response to residual soil test potassium in North Mississippi","authors":"Brendan Zurweller,&nbsp;Yangyang Song,&nbsp;Andrew Dygert,&nbsp;Jac Varco,&nbsp;Bryan Whittenton,&nbsp;Justin May,&nbsp;Brad Burgess","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20312","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The average U.S. peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) yield has increased by approximately 25% with the adoption of peanut cultivar ‘Georgia-06G’. Since this adoption, many new high yielding runner cultivars with similar yield potential have been released. However, current nutrient recommendations are based on soil tests that were developed prior to the release of Georgia-06G. Particularly for potassium, current soil test potassium (STK) critical values were established on soil textures with relatively low cation exchange capacity (CEC) but were not validated on soil textures with high CEC. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and yield response of five recently released peanut cultivars to four STK levels ranging from very low to medium based on Mississippi State University Extension soil testing recommendations. The STK classification levels were also based on two soil series categorized with high CEC—Leeper (∼38.4 meq 100 g<sup>−1</sup>) and Marietta (∼15.9 meq 100 g<sup>−1</sup>) soil series. Cultivars Georgia-06G, ‘Georgia-16HO’, ‘Georgia-18RU’, FloRun ‘331’, and ‘AU-NPL-17’ were evaluated in this study. No STK × variety interaction occurred, indicating similar K requirements across all varieties evaluated. However, a positive pod yield response occurred in both soil types when the average STK increased from 128 to 167 lbs ac<sup>−1</sup> for all cultivars and site years. Critical STK values on both soils were greater than many current Extension recommendations, and the critical STK value of Leeper is greater than the Marietta soil series, likely due to the higher CEC value. These results demonstrate the need to adjust peanut STK sufficiency levels based on soil CEC. Further evaluation of modern peanut cultivar productivity response to STK sufficiency levels is needed for soils with moderate CEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142233211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soybean stand and yield impact from a fungicide seed treatment in North Carolina soybean production 北卡罗来纳州大豆生产中杀菌剂种子处理对大豆株型和产量的影响
IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20311
J. J. Hurry, R. A. Vann, K. D Stowe, G. D. Collins, C. W. Cahoon, D. Anderson, B. Barrow, A. Baucom, T. Britton, J. Carleo, T. Coggins, P. Flowers, A. Gibbs, R. Gurganus, T. Hambrick, M. Huffman, D. King, M. Malloy, M. Place, H. Rhodes, M. Seitz, B. Szilvay, M. S. Tilley, J. Waters, L. Worden, L. Lux

North Carolina soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] producers have shifted to earlier planting dates as a mechanism to increase soybean yields. As growers have shifted to earlier planting dates, soybean fungicide seed treatment use has become more common. In 2020 and 2021, on-farm research investigated the value of a fungicide seed treatment across the state. Experiments were conducted across 18 diverse production environments in North Carolina during that time. Treatments included fungicide seed treatment (fludioxonil: 2.32%, mefenoxam: 13.9%, and sedaxane: 2.32%, i.e., Vibrance Trio, a commonly used multi-mode of action fungicide across the state and country) compared to untreated seed. Data collected included soybean stand and soybean yield. The use of a fungicide seed treatment variably affected stand, but when combined over environments, fungicide seed treated plots averaged 110,757 plants/acre as opposed to untreated plots averaging 101,570 plants/acre with significant stand protection in seven of 18 environments. When averaged across environments, fungicide seed treatment protected yield by 1.3 bu/acre which, depending on input practices and soybean selling price, would border providing a return on investment. As planting date was delayed past mid-April, yield decreased for both fungicide treated and untreated plots. Results from this trial indicate that fungicide seed treatments can provide protection of soybean yield and stand in North Carolina although protection provided may not provide a return on investment with current input prices.

北卡罗来纳州的大豆 [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] 生产者已将播种日期提前,以此提高大豆产量。随着种植者转向更早的播种日期,大豆杀真菌剂种子处理的使用也变得更加普遍。2020 年和 2021 年,农场研究调查了全州杀菌剂种子处理的价值。在此期间,在北卡罗来纳州 18 个不同的生产环境中进行了实验。处理方法包括杀菌剂种子处理(氟虫腈:2.32%;甲霜灵:13.9%;苯醚甲环唑:1.5%):即 Vibrance Trio,一种在全州和全国范围内常用的多作用模式杀菌剂)与未处理的种子进行比较。收集的数据包括大豆株高和大豆产量。使用杀真菌剂种子处理对立地有不同程度的影响,但综合不同环境,杀真菌剂种子处理地块的平均株数为 110,757 株/英亩,而未处理地块的平均株数为 101,570 株/英亩,在 18 种环境中的 7 种环境中,立地保护效果显著。如果将所有环境的平均值相加,杀菌剂种子处理可使产量提高 1.3 蒲式耳/英亩,根据投入实践和大豆销售价格,这将带来投资回报。随着播种日期推迟到 4 月中旬以后,杀真菌剂处理过的地块和未处理过的地块的产量都有所下降。试验结果表明,杀真菌剂种子处理剂可以保护北卡罗来纳州的大豆产量和株型,但在目前的投入价格下,所提供的保护可能无法带来投资回报。
{"title":"Soybean stand and yield impact from a fungicide seed treatment in North Carolina soybean production","authors":"J. J. Hurry,&nbsp;R. A. Vann,&nbsp;K. D Stowe,&nbsp;G. D. Collins,&nbsp;C. W. Cahoon,&nbsp;D. Anderson,&nbsp;B. Barrow,&nbsp;A. Baucom,&nbsp;T. Britton,&nbsp;J. Carleo,&nbsp;T. Coggins,&nbsp;P. Flowers,&nbsp;A. Gibbs,&nbsp;R. Gurganus,&nbsp;T. Hambrick,&nbsp;M. Huffman,&nbsp;D. King,&nbsp;M. Malloy,&nbsp;M. Place,&nbsp;H. Rhodes,&nbsp;M. Seitz,&nbsp;B. Szilvay,&nbsp;M. S. Tilley,&nbsp;J. Waters,&nbsp;L. Worden,&nbsp;L. Lux","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20311","url":null,"abstract":"<p>North Carolina soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] producers have shifted to earlier planting dates as a mechanism to increase soybean yields. As growers have shifted to earlier planting dates, soybean fungicide seed treatment use has become more common. In 2020 and 2021, on-farm research investigated the value of a fungicide seed treatment across the state. Experiments were conducted across 18 diverse production environments in North Carolina during that time. Treatments included fungicide seed treatment (fludioxonil: 2.32%, mefenoxam: 13.9%, and sedaxane: 2.32%, i.e., Vibrance Trio, a commonly used multi-mode of action fungicide across the state and country) compared to untreated seed. Data collected included soybean stand and soybean yield. The use of a fungicide seed treatment variably affected stand, but when combined over environments, fungicide seed treated plots averaged 110,757 plants/acre as opposed to untreated plots averaging 101,570 plants/acre with significant stand protection in seven of 18 environments. When averaged across environments, fungicide seed treatment protected yield by 1.3 bu/acre which, depending on input practices and soybean selling price, would border providing a return on investment. As planting date was delayed past mid-April, yield decreased for both fungicide treated and untreated plots. Results from this trial indicate that fungicide seed treatments can provide protection of soybean yield and stand in North Carolina although protection provided may not provide a return on investment with current input prices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20311","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142233212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1