Estefania Polli, Travis Gannon, Ronald Rogers, Mathieu LeCompte, Charles Cahoon, Katherine Jennings, Matthew Vann
Herbicides are one of the primary tools for vegetation management along roadsides. However, the drift of particles and vapors from herbicide applications along roadsides can cause damage and yield loss in adjacent sensitive crops. The objective of this research was to investigate the response of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) to sublethal rates of five herbicides [sulfometuron-methyl, indaziflam, triclopyr, triclopyr + clopyralid, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) + dichlorprop] commonly used along North Carolina roadsides. Each herbicide was applied at four rates (0.01×, 0.05×, 0.10×, and 1× of the field rate) and at six different timings (18, 12, and 6 weeks before planting or transplanting, at planting or transplanting, and 4 and 8 weeks after planting or transplanting). Field studies were conducted at the Sandhills Research Station near Jackson Springs, NC, in 2022 and 2023. In soybean, triclopyr applied post-planting caused the greatest injury and yield loss, up to 100% when applied at the full dose (1×), while indaziflam was most damaging at or before planting. In tobacco, triclopyr followed by 2,4-D + dichlorprop applied post-transplanting caused the greatest injury and height reduction, whereas indaziflam caused mild visual injury (≤28%) and minimal height reduction across all timings. Crop damage generally increased with rate; however, injury, height reduction, and yield loss were occasionally observed even at the lowest rate (0.01×). These findings demonstrate that herbicides commonly used for roadside vegetation management differ in their potential to injure soybean and tobacco crops, underscoring the importance of informed and cautious herbicide selection to minimize the risk of off-target injury when these crops are grown near roadsides.
除草剂是沿路植被管理的主要工具之一。然而,喷洒除草剂产生的颗粒和蒸汽沿路边漂移会对邻近的敏感作物造成损害和产量损失。本研究的目的是研究大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。]和烟草(Nicotiana tabacum L.)对北卡罗莱纳州路边常用的五种除草剂[甲基磺美通龙、吲唑吡喃、三氯吡啶、三氯吡啶+氯吡啶和2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4- d) +二氯丙]的亚致死率的影响。每种除草剂按4种施药率(田间施药率的0.01倍、0.05倍、0.10倍和1倍)和6个不同时间(种植或移栽前18周、12周和6周、种植或移栽时、种植或移栽后4周和8周)施用。实地研究于2022年和2023年在北卡罗来纳州杰克逊斯普林斯附近的Sandhills研究站进行。在大豆中,种植后施用三氯吡虫啉造成的伤害和产量损失最大,当全剂量(1倍)施用时可达100%,而在种植时或种植前施用茚地夫兰的危害最大。在烟草中,在移栽后施用三氯吡虫啉后再施用2,4- d +二氯丙,造成最大的损伤和高度降低,而在所有时间内,茚地夫兰造成轻度视觉损伤(≤28%)和最小的高度降低。作物损害普遍随速率增加而增加;然而,即使在最低的发生率(0.01×)下,偶尔也会观察到伤害、高度降低和产量损失。这些发现表明,通常用于路边植被管理的除草剂对大豆和烟草作物的伤害潜力不同,强调了知情和谨慎选择除草剂的重要性,以尽量减少这些作物在路边种植时脱靶伤害的风险。
{"title":"Soybean and tobacco response to sublethal rates of herbicides used along roadsides","authors":"Estefania Polli, Travis Gannon, Ronald Rogers, Mathieu LeCompte, Charles Cahoon, Katherine Jennings, Matthew Vann","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70102","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Herbicides are one of the primary tools for vegetation management along roadsides. However, the drift of particles and vapors from herbicide applications along roadsides can cause damage and yield loss in adjacent sensitive crops. The objective of this research was to investigate the response of soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] and tobacco (<i>Nicotiana tabacum</i> L.) to sublethal rates of five herbicides [sulfometuron-methyl, indaziflam, triclopyr, triclopyr + clopyralid, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) + dichlorprop] commonly used along North Carolina roadsides. Each herbicide was applied at four rates (0.01×, 0.05×, 0.10×, and 1× of the field rate) and at six different timings (18, 12, and 6 weeks before planting or transplanting, at planting or transplanting, and 4 and 8 weeks after planting or transplanting). Field studies were conducted at the Sandhills Research Station near Jackson Springs, NC, in 2022 and 2023. In soybean, triclopyr applied post-planting caused the greatest injury and yield loss, up to 100% when applied at the full dose (1×), while indaziflam was most damaging at or before planting. In tobacco, triclopyr followed by 2,4-D + dichlorprop applied post-transplanting caused the greatest injury and height reduction, whereas indaziflam caused mild visual injury (≤28%) and minimal height reduction across all timings. Crop damage generally increased with rate; however, injury, height reduction, and yield loss were occasionally observed even at the lowest rate (0.01×). These findings demonstrate that herbicides commonly used for roadside vegetation management differ in their potential to injure soybean and tobacco crops, underscoring the importance of informed and cautious herbicide selection to minimize the risk of off-target injury when these crops are grown near roadsides.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70102","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Brett Rushing, William L. Kingery, Rocky W. Lemus, Kelsey M. Harvey, Johnson C. Lyles
Integrated crop–livestock systems are designed to enhance soil health attributes, thereby contributing to increased crop production and economic profitability. The objective of this research was to compare the effects on soil health of various soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]–cover crop–livestock production systems. A field trial was conducted at the Coastal Plain Branch Experiment Station (CPBES) in Newton, MS, and the Prairie Research Unit (PRU) in Prairie, MS, from 2021 to 2023. Treatments included (a) conventional tillage soybean (CS), (b) no-till soybean + cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop, and (c) no-till soybean + grazed cereal rye cover crop (GC). Soil health analyses were conducted on samples collected biannually from each location. At CPBES, no biological parameters were affected by the treatment. At PRU, permanganate oxidizable carbon and soil organic matter were lowest for CS on the third and fourth sampling dates (both 5.6 ppm). Extractable P was higher in CS treatments at CPBES for all sampling dates. At PRU, extractable K was highest in GC treatments on three of the four sampling dates. At CPBES, penetration resistance was greatest in GC treatments across all sampling dates, while water-stable aggregate formation in GC treatments was greater than in CS treatments on the third and fourth sampling dates (third: 22.6 vs. 14.5 lb in.2; fourth: 27.6 vs. 20.2 lb in.2). No differences in the comprehensive assessment of soil health scores were observed at CPBES (p = 0.5003) or PRU (p = 0.0616), suggesting that, although differences in individual analyses may be present, the impact of grazed and ungrazed cover crop treatments was negligible on soil health during the experimental period.
作物-牲畜综合系统旨在提高土壤健康属性,从而有助于提高作物产量和经济盈利能力。本研究的目的是比较不同大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]对土壤健康的影响。稳定。-覆盖作物-牲畜生产系统。从2021年到2023年,在密西西比州牛顿的沿海平原分支实验站(CPBES)和密西西比州Prairie的草原研究单位(PRU)进行了现场试验。处理包括(a)常规耕作大豆(CS)、(b)免耕大豆+谷物黑麦(Secale cereale L.)覆盖作物和(c)免耕大豆+放牧谷物黑麦覆盖作物(GC)。对每半年从每个地点收集的样本进行了土壤健康分析。在CPBES,治疗没有影响生物学参数。在PRU,高锰酸盐可氧化碳和土壤有机质在第三和第四采样日期最低(均为5.6 ppm)。在CPBES的所有采样日期,CS处理的可提取P较高。在PRU,四个采样日期中有三个GC处理的可提取K最高。在CPBES,在所有采样日期,GC处理的渗透阻力最大,而在第三和第四采样日期,GC处理的水稳性团聚体形成大于CS处理(第三:22.6 vs. 14.5 lb in.2;第四:27.6 vs. 20.2 lb in.2)。在CPBES (p = 0.5003)和PRU (p = 0.0616)中,土壤健康评分的综合评估没有差异,这表明,尽管个体分析可能存在差异,但在实验期间,放牧和未放牧覆盖作物处理对土壤健康的影响可以忽略不计。
{"title":"Soil health responses to cover cropping systems in Mississippi soybean production","authors":"J. Brett Rushing, William L. Kingery, Rocky W. Lemus, Kelsey M. Harvey, Johnson C. Lyles","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70106","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrated crop–livestock systems are designed to enhance soil health attributes, thereby contributing to increased crop production and economic profitability. The objective of this research was to compare the effects on soil health of various soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.]–cover crop–livestock production systems. A field trial was conducted at the Coastal Plain Branch Experiment Station (CPBES) in Newton, MS, and the Prairie Research Unit (PRU) in Prairie, MS, from 2021 to 2023. Treatments included (a) conventional tillage soybean (CS), (b) no-till soybean + cereal rye (<i>Secale cereale</i> L.) cover crop, and (c) no-till soybean + grazed cereal rye cover crop (GC). Soil health analyses were conducted on samples collected biannually from each location. At CPBES, no biological parameters were affected by the treatment. At PRU, permanganate oxidizable carbon and soil organic matter were lowest for CS on the third and fourth sampling dates (both 5.6 ppm). Extractable P was higher in CS treatments at CPBES for all sampling dates. At PRU, extractable K was highest in GC treatments on three of the four sampling dates. At CPBES, penetration resistance was greatest in GC treatments across all sampling dates, while water-stable aggregate formation in GC treatments was greater than in CS treatments on the third and fourth sampling dates (third: 22.6 vs. 14.5 lb in.<sup>2</sup>; fourth: 27.6 vs. 20.2 lb in.<sup>2</sup>). No differences in the comprehensive assessment of soil health scores were observed at CPBES (<i>p</i> = 0.5003) or PRU (<i>p</i> = 0.0616), suggesting that, although differences in individual analyses may be present, the impact of grazed and ungrazed cover crop treatments was negligible on soil health during the experimental period.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Justin S. Calhoun, Angelica J. Crosby, Bradley R. Wilson, Chase A. Floyd, Morgan P. Davis
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production contributes substantial organic matter and nutrients to subsequent rotations, but residue distribution by harvest equipment is often uneven. This study quantified peanut chaff distribution across 6-row combines at multiple sites in the Missouri Delta during 2023 and 2024. Vine and leaf residues were sampled at the left, center, and right swath positions, then dried and analyzed for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) content. Leaf residue accumulated predominantly in the swath center (2350 lb ac−1) compared with the left (813 lb ac−1) and right (603 lb ac−1), resulting in greater nutrient deposition in central rows (N: 63 vs. 21–26 lb ac−1; P: 4.5 vs. 1.6–1.9 lb ac−1; K: 78 vs. 31–36 lb ac−1). Vine residue showed similar but less pronounced patterns. These findings demonstrate that peanut combines produce nonuniform residue and nutrient return at harvest. Although crop responses were not directly measured, spatial variability in residue may influence early growth and nutrient availability for rotational crops. Strategies such as equipment retrofits, postharvest redistribution, or cover crop integration could reduce intra-field variability and optimize rotational benefits.
花生(arachhis hypogaea L.)生产为随后的轮作提供了大量的有机物质和营养物质,但收获设备的残留物分布往往不均匀。本研究量化了2023年和2024年密苏里三角洲多个地点6行联合收割机的花生糠分布。在左侧、中部和右侧取样藤和叶片残留物,然后干燥并分析氮(N)、磷(P)和钾(K)含量。与左侧(813 lb ac−1)和右侧(603 lb ac−1)相比,叶渣主要积聚在地块中心(2350 lb ac−1),导致更多的营养物质沉积在中央行(N: 63 vs. 21-26 lb ac−1;P: 4.5 vs. 1.6-1.9 lb ac−1;K: 78 vs. 31-36 lb ac−1)。葡萄藤残留物也显示出类似但不那么明显的模式。这些结果表明,花生组合在收获时产生不均匀的残留和养分回报。虽然没有直接测量作物的反应,但残留的空间变异性可能影响轮作作物的早期生长和养分有效性。诸如设备改造、收获后再分配或覆盖作物整合等策略可以减少田间变异性并优化轮作效益。
{"title":"Peanut combine residue distribution and nutrient stratification across the harvest swath","authors":"Justin S. Calhoun, Angelica J. Crosby, Bradley R. Wilson, Chase A. Floyd, Morgan P. Davis","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70105","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) production contributes substantial organic matter and nutrients to subsequent rotations, but residue distribution by harvest equipment is often uneven. This study quantified peanut chaff distribution across 6-row combines at multiple sites in the Missouri Delta during 2023 and 2024. Vine and leaf residues were sampled at the left, center, and right swath positions, then dried and analyzed for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) content. Leaf residue accumulated predominantly in the swath center (2350 lb ac<sup>−1</sup>) compared with the left (813 lb ac<sup>−1</sup>) and right (603 lb ac<sup>−1</sup>), resulting in greater nutrient deposition in central rows (N: 63 vs. 21–26 lb ac<sup>−1</sup>; P: 4.5 vs. 1.6–1.9 lb ac<sup>−1</sup>; K: 78 vs. 31–36 lb ac<sup>−1</sup>). Vine residue showed similar but less pronounced patterns. These findings demonstrate that peanut combines produce nonuniform residue and nutrient return at harvest. Although crop responses were not directly measured, spatial variability in residue may influence early growth and nutrient availability for rotational crops. Strategies such as equipment retrofits, postharvest redistribution, or cover crop integration could reduce intra-field variability and optimize rotational benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70105","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael J. W. Maw, James H. Houx III, Felix B. Fritschi
Producers in the lower Midwest United States often plant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] as a double crop following the harvest of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), but yields are lower than those of full-season soybean. An alternative legume crop commonly grown in the upper Midwest and Western United States is dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), but no published data are available on the best-suited market classes and cultivars for production in the lower Midwest. Therefore, a 2-year study was conducted in central Missouri in 2013–2014 to test representative cultivars from eight dry bean market classes for grain yield and leaf greenness. Grain yields ranged from 754 to 2548 lb ac−1, with cultivars from the Great Northern white and black-market classes producing higher yields than the five lowest yielding cultivars. Leaf greenness was greater in the small red, pink, and pinto cultivars than in the white kidney, black, Great Northern, and small red kidney cultivars and did not correspond to grain yield. In general, dry bean in Missouri have potential yields comparable to those in the upper Midwest. Producers should consider the Great Northern white, black, small red, and pink market classes. Further research is necessary to test a broader range of cultivars across diverse environments to provide better agronomic recommendations.
美国中西部地区的生产者经常种植大豆[Glycine max (L.)]。稳定。作为小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)收获后的双重作物,但产量低于全季大豆。通常在美国中西部北部和西部种植的另一种豆类作物是干豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.),但没有关于最适合中西部南部生产的市场类别和品种的公开数据。因此,2013-2014年在密苏里州中部进行了为期2年的研究,对8个干豆市场类别的代表性品种的籽粒产量和叶片绿度进行了测试。谷物产量从754磅到2548磅不等,来自大北方的白色和黑市品种的产量高于5个产量最低的品种。小红、粉红和花斑品种的叶片绿度大于白肾、黑、大北方和小红肾品种,且与产量不对应。一般来说,密苏里州的干豆具有与中西部上游相当的潜在产量。生产商应该考虑大北方白葡萄酒、黑葡萄酒、小红葡萄酒和粉红葡萄酒。进一步的研究是必要的,以便在不同的环境中测试更广泛的品种,以提供更好的农艺建议。
{"title":"Evaluating dry bean as a potential alternative to double-cropped soybean following wheat in the lower Midwest","authors":"Michael J. W. Maw, James H. Houx III, Felix B. Fritschi","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70099","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Producers in the lower Midwest United States often plant soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] as a double crop following the harvest of wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.), but yields are lower than those of full-season soybean. An alternative legume crop commonly grown in the upper Midwest and Western United States is dry bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.), but no published data are available on the best-suited market classes and cultivars for production in the lower Midwest. Therefore, a 2-year study was conducted in central Missouri in 2013–2014 to test representative cultivars from eight dry bean market classes for grain yield and leaf greenness. Grain yields ranged from 754 to 2548 lb ac<sup>−1</sup>, with cultivars from the Great Northern white and black-market classes producing higher yields than the five lowest yielding cultivars. Leaf greenness was greater in the small red, pink, and pinto cultivars than in the white kidney, black, Great Northern, and small red kidney cultivars and did not correspond to grain yield. In general, dry bean in Missouri have potential yields comparable to those in the upper Midwest. Producers should consider the Great Northern white, black, small red, and pink market classes. Further research is necessary to test a broader range of cultivars across diverse environments to provide better agronomic recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aeration, when combined with sand topdressing, introduces sand into putting green root zones. More intensive aeration during a single event is becoming increasingly common to reduce the number of aeration events during a year. The goal of this study was to compare different aerator-pass frequencies with 0.375- or 0.625-inch (diameter) solid tines during a single aeration event. Experiments were conducted on cool-season putting greens at Chambers Bay Golf Course and Tacoma Country and Golf Club during three aeration events in 2023 and 2024. Six aeration treatments included solid-tine aeration with 0.375- or 0.625-inch tines for one (1×), two (2×), or three (3×) passes using an aerator set to a 3-inch depth on 2-inch centers. An uncultivated control was included for comparison. All sand additions and removals were weighed to determine the amount of sand incorporated into each plot. Total organic matter was determined for depths of 1 and 3 inches before and after aeration. Sand incorporation generally increased with aeration tine size and with the number of aerator passes and was similar between 2× and 3× frequencies with 0.375-inch tine aeration and 1× 0.625-inch tine aeration. Total organic matter from a depth of 1 inch ranged from ∼6% to 9% at each golf course in Spring 2023 and increased through Spring 2024 only for untreated plots. Superintendents can use multiple passes with smaller tines to achieve as much sand incorporation and organic matter mitigation as traditional, “aggressive” aeration does with a single pass from larger tines.
{"title":"Effects of within-event aerator-pass frequency and tine size on sand incorporation and organic matter accumulation in cool-season putting greens of the Pacific Northwest","authors":"Cory Isom, Cole Thompson","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70104","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aeration, when combined with sand topdressing, introduces sand into putting green root zones. More intensive aeration during a single event is becoming increasingly common to reduce the number of aeration events during a year. The goal of this study was to compare different aerator-pass frequencies with 0.375- or 0.625-inch (diameter) solid tines during a single aeration event. Experiments were conducted on cool-season putting greens at Chambers Bay Golf Course and Tacoma Country and Golf Club during three aeration events in 2023 and 2024. Six aeration treatments included solid-tine aeration with 0.375- or 0.625-inch tines for one (1×), two (2×), or three (3×) passes using an aerator set to a 3-inch depth on 2-inch centers. An uncultivated control was included for comparison. All sand additions and removals were weighed to determine the amount of sand incorporated into each plot. Total organic matter was determined for depths of 1 and 3 inches before and after aeration. Sand incorporation generally increased with aeration tine size and with the number of aerator passes and was similar between 2× and 3× frequencies with 0.375-inch tine aeration and 1× 0.625-inch tine aeration. Total organic matter from a depth of 1 inch ranged from ∼6% to 9% at each golf course in Spring 2023 and increased through Spring 2024 only for untreated plots. Superintendents can use multiple passes with smaller tines to achieve as much sand incorporation and organic matter mitigation as traditional, “aggressive” aeration does with a single pass from larger tines.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70104","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pedro H. J. Fernandes, Shelby L. Davies-Jenkins, Wei-Zhen Liang, Mary E. Drewnoski, Yijie Xiong
Managing grazing efficiency requires reliable and practical tools to estimate forage mass. Traditional methods like clipping, though accurate, are time consuming and labor intensive. In this study, two imaging tools, Canopeo and the Crop Canopy Image Analyzer (CCIA), were evaluated for their efficacy in estimating the forage mass of cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) using smartphone images collected under rotational grazing conditions in Nebraska, USA. Over 2 years, 400 forage samples were collected. Forage images were taken using smartphones before clipping, and canopy cover was estimated from these images using Canopeo and the CCIA tool. Regression analysis was performed to compare the canopy cover obtained using these image tools with the measured dry forage mass. Quadratic regressions were developed using 80% of the data. Validation of the predicted and measured forage mass was conducted using the remaining 20% of the data. Both tools showed strong predictive potential, with the CCIA being relatively simpler to operate and exhibiting slightly superior performance (r2 = 0.78; RMSE = 362 lb DM ac−1) compared with Canopeo (r2 = 0.72; RMSE = 446 lb DM ac−1). Our results indicated that canopy cover relative to forage mass showed greater variability at more mature phenological stages, plausibly attributed to stem elongation rather than leaf mass accumulation. These findings suggest that both tools are suitable for use during the vegetative stage, when grazing typically occurs, but may be less accurate at advanced maturity stages. Nondestructive image-based approaches offer a practical, time-saving alternative to traditional methods and hold promise for supporting producers and scientists in making timely grazing decisions.
{"title":"Assessing forage mass using smartphone imagery for cereal rye under grazing conditions in Nebraska","authors":"Pedro H. J. Fernandes, Shelby L. Davies-Jenkins, Wei-Zhen Liang, Mary E. Drewnoski, Yijie Xiong","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70101","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing grazing efficiency requires reliable and practical tools to estimate forage mass. Traditional methods like clipping, though accurate, are time consuming and labor intensive. In this study, two imaging tools, Canopeo and the Crop Canopy Image Analyzer (CCIA), were evaluated for their efficacy in estimating the forage mass of cereal rye (<i>Secale cereale</i> L.) using smartphone images collected under rotational grazing conditions in Nebraska, USA. Over 2 years, 400 forage samples were collected. Forage images were taken using smartphones before clipping, and canopy cover was estimated from these images using Canopeo and the CCIA tool. Regression analysis was performed to compare the canopy cover obtained using these image tools with the measured dry forage mass. Quadratic regressions were developed using 80% of the data. Validation of the predicted and measured forage mass was conducted using the remaining 20% of the data. Both tools showed strong predictive potential, with the CCIA being relatively simpler to operate and exhibiting slightly superior performance (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.78; RMSE = 362 lb DM ac<sup>−1</sup>) compared with Canopeo (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.72; RMSE = 446 lb DM ac<sup>−1</sup>). Our results indicated that canopy cover relative to forage mass showed greater variability at more mature phenological stages, plausibly attributed to stem elongation rather than leaf mass accumulation. These findings suggest that both tools are suitable for use during the vegetative stage, when grazing typically occurs, but may be less accurate at advanced maturity stages. Nondestructive image-based approaches offer a practical, time-saving alternative to traditional methods and hold promise for supporting producers and scientists in making timely grazing decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70101","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147299829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Summer P. Thomas, Rory O. Maguire, Gabriel J. Pent, Benjamin F. Tracy
Rotational bale grazing (RBG), the strategic feeding of round hay bales directly on pasture with controlled access, offers an alternative to continuous winter hay feeding in a single paddock. This study evaluated RBG's potential to redistribute nutrients by increasing soil concentrations in field areas with lower phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations while mitigating excess concentrations in other areas. Soil nutrient concentrations were measured over 2 years before and after RBG implementation. Changes in Mehlich 1-P, Mehlich 1-K, water-soluble P, nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), and pH values were compared across three treatments: (a) RBG bale (soil grids where hay bales were placed in the RBG system), (b) RBG no-bale (soil grids where no-bales were placed in the RBG system), and (c) continuous (soil under continuous winter hay feeding for >2 decades). The RBG bale treatment added Mehlich 1-P to the soil, but not in sufficient quantities to significantly increase concentrations compared with the RBG no-bale treatment. In contrast, Mehlich 1-K values increased substantially in the RBG bale treatment areas. Each hay bale applied ∼17.86 lb of K, far exceeding the amount needed to raise soil test K concentrations by 1 ppm. Water-soluble P remained stable in the RBG bale treatment areas but decreased in the RBG no-bale treatment areas. Bale placement had no significant effect on NO3-N or pH values. These findings demonstrate RBG's potential to improve soil fertility in nutrient-deficient pasture areas, particularly through notable increases in Mehlich 1-K values.
{"title":"Does rotational bale grazing affect the distribution of soil nutrients across pastures?","authors":"Summer P. Thomas, Rory O. Maguire, Gabriel J. Pent, Benjamin F. Tracy","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70090","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rotational bale grazing (RBG), the strategic feeding of round hay bales directly on pasture with controlled access, offers an alternative to continuous winter hay feeding in a single paddock. This study evaluated RBG's potential to redistribute nutrients by increasing soil concentrations in field areas with lower phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations while mitigating excess concentrations in other areas. Soil nutrient concentrations were measured over 2 years before and after RBG implementation. Changes in Mehlich 1-P, Mehlich 1-K, water-soluble P, nitrate-nitrogen (NO<sub>3</sub>-N), and pH values were compared across three treatments: (a) RBG bale (soil grids where hay bales were placed in the RBG system), (b) RBG no-bale (soil grids where no-bales were placed in the RBG system), and (c) continuous (soil under continuous winter hay feeding for >2 decades). The RBG bale treatment added Mehlich 1-P to the soil, but not in sufficient quantities to significantly increase concentrations compared with the RBG no-bale treatment. In contrast, Mehlich 1-K values increased substantially in the RBG bale treatment areas. Each hay bale applied ∼17.86 lb of K, far exceeding the amount needed to raise soil test K concentrations by 1 ppm. Water-soluble P remained stable in the RBG bale treatment areas but decreased in the RBG no-bale treatment areas. Bale placement had no significant effect on NO<sub>3</sub>-N or pH values. These findings demonstrate RBG's potential to improve soil fertility in nutrient-deficient pasture areas, particularly through notable increases in Mehlich 1-K values.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Seed moisture content (SMC) is the most reliable indicator of seed maturity and the optimal harvest timing in grass seed crops. Current SMC testing methodologies used in grass seed crops are slow or inaccurate, making it difficult to make timely harvest decisions. Harvesting too early can result in low seed weight and poor seed germination. Delaying harvest past the point of physiological maturity reduces seed yield by increasing losses due to shattering. Our objective was to validate the feasibility of using portable near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) as a field-based alternative to the oven method for determining SMC in cool-season grass seed crops. Eight cool-season grass species were used in field testing of the portable NIRS sensor over eight harvest seasons. Daily testing of SMC began when grass seed crops were at Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt and Chemische Industrie (BBCH) growth stage 69 and continued until windrowing. Seed samples were collected from each crop by cutting ∼40 inflorescences, then stripping the seeds into airtight containers until ready for estimation of SMC with a portable NIRS sensor, using SMC measurement by laboratory air-oven (130°C) as the reference method. The SMC estimates made by the portable NIRS sensor were predictive of the actual SMC determined by the oven reference method across all eight grass species. These SMC predictions by the sensor closely followed the seasonal loss of SMC as the seed matured. Spring agronomic practices (mowing, plant growth regulators, foliar fungicides, and nitrogen fertilization) did not influence NIRS predictions of SMC compared with untreated controls. The portable NIRS sensor is a promising tool for determining harvest timing in grass seed crops by using predicted SMC values.
{"title":"Validation of a portable near-infrared reflectance spectrometer to determine harvest maturity in grass seed crops","authors":"Nicole P. Anderson, Thomas G. Chastain, Jing Zhou","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70097","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seed moisture content (SMC) is the most reliable indicator of seed maturity and the optimal harvest timing in grass seed crops. Current SMC testing methodologies used in grass seed crops are slow or inaccurate, making it difficult to make timely harvest decisions. Harvesting too early can result in low seed weight and poor seed germination. Delaying harvest past the point of physiological maturity reduces seed yield by increasing losses due to shattering. Our objective was to validate the feasibility of using portable near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) as a field-based alternative to the oven method for determining SMC in cool-season grass seed crops. Eight cool-season grass species were used in field testing of the portable NIRS sensor over eight harvest seasons. Daily testing of SMC began when grass seed crops were at Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt and Chemische Industrie (BBCH) growth stage 69 and continued until windrowing. Seed samples were collected from each crop by cutting ∼40 inflorescences, then stripping the seeds into airtight containers until ready for estimation of SMC with a portable NIRS sensor, using SMC measurement by laboratory air-oven (130°C) as the reference method. The SMC estimates made by the portable NIRS sensor were predictive of the actual SMC determined by the oven reference method across all eight grass species. These SMC predictions by the sensor closely followed the seasonal loss of SMC as the seed matured. Spring agronomic practices (mowing, plant growth regulators, foliar fungicides, and nitrogen fertilization) did not influence NIRS predictions of SMC compared with untreated controls. The portable NIRS sensor is a promising tool for determining harvest timing in grass seed crops by using predicted SMC values.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70097","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147299861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sub-Saharan Africa faces a severe and growing ruminant feed deficit, constraining livestock productivity and the development of sustainable, climate-resilient food systems. This article quantifies the deficit and assesses the role of improved cultivated forages in closing it across 10 countries: South Sudan, Sudan, Somalia, Malawi, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Mali, Senegal, and Nigeria. The analysis estimates that addressing the forage gap over a 10-year horizon would require more than 1.2 million hectares of cultivated forage, the engagement of over 1.1 million farmers, and up to 100,000 metric tons of seed. This expansion represents a major economic opportunity, with a potential forage seed market value of US$247–424 million and forage crop value of US$3.4–6.2 billion, depending on the adoption scenario. Despite growing policy recognition of feed shortages in the studied countries, systemic barriers—including weak and import-dependent seed systems, limited private-sector investment, land competition, and inadequate extension services—continue to restrict forage adoption. Closing the feed gap will require integrated technical and institutional measures: strengthening local seed production, harmonizing regional seed regulations, incentivizing private-sector engagement, improving farmer training, and embedding forage development into livestock strategies. With coordinated investments, improved forages can significantly increase livestock productivity, rural incomes, and climate resilience across sub-Saharan Africa.
{"title":"Transforming livestock through forages: Opportunities, barriers, and strategic priorities in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Stefan Burkart, Solomon Mwendia, Peggy Karimi","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70110","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sub-Saharan Africa faces a severe and growing ruminant feed deficit, constraining livestock productivity and the development of sustainable, climate-resilient food systems. This article quantifies the deficit and assesses the role of improved cultivated forages in closing it across 10 countries: South Sudan, Sudan, Somalia, Malawi, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Mali, Senegal, and Nigeria. The analysis estimates that addressing the forage gap over a 10-year horizon would require more than 1.2 million hectares of cultivated forage, the engagement of over 1.1 million farmers, and up to 100,000 metric tons of seed. This expansion represents a major economic opportunity, with a potential forage seed market value of US$247–424 million and forage crop value of US$3.4–6.2 billion, depending on the adoption scenario. Despite growing policy recognition of feed shortages in the studied countries, systemic barriers—including weak and import-dependent seed systems, limited private-sector investment, land competition, and inadequate extension services—continue to restrict forage adoption. Closing the feed gap will require integrated technical and institutional measures: strengthening local seed production, harmonizing regional seed regulations, incentivizing private-sector engagement, improving farmer training, and embedding forage development into livestock strategies. With coordinated investments, improved forages can significantly increase livestock productivity, rural incomes, and climate resilience across sub-Saharan Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146680461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James D. McCurdy, Rebecca G. Bowling, Aaron J. Patton, Edicarlos B. de Castro, James T. Brosnan, David E. Ervin, Shawn D. Askew, Clebson G. Gonçalves, Matthew T. Elmore, J. Scott McElroy, Brandon C. McNally, Benjamin D. Pritchard, John E. Kaminski, Travis W. Gannon, J. Bryan Unruh, Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan
Poa annua L. is a widespread and persistent weed in managed turfgrass systems, exhibiting both annual and short-lived perennial growth habits. Effective management requires an integrated approach, with chemical herbicides remaining a primary tool. This review outlines the current landscape of chemical control strategies, including pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicide options, plant growth regulators, and emerging chemistries. Herbicide resistance in Poa annua continues to pose a significant challenge, with confirmed cases spanning multiple modes of action. Consequently, sustainable management depends on rotating herbicide classes, using mixtures and sequences of treatments, and integrating nonchemical tactics. Continued research into novel herbicide modes of action, application technologies, and integrated weed management approaches will be critical for maintaining long-term control of Poa annua across diverse turfgrass systems.
{"title":"Chemical control strategies for Poa annua in managed turfgrass systems","authors":"James D. McCurdy, Rebecca G. Bowling, Aaron J. Patton, Edicarlos B. de Castro, James T. Brosnan, David E. Ervin, Shawn D. Askew, Clebson G. Gonçalves, Matthew T. Elmore, J. Scott McElroy, Brandon C. McNally, Benjamin D. Pritchard, John E. Kaminski, Travis W. Gannon, J. Bryan Unruh, Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Poa annua</i> L. is a widespread and persistent weed in managed turfgrass systems, exhibiting both annual and short-lived perennial growth habits. Effective management requires an integrated approach, with chemical herbicides remaining a primary tool. This review outlines the current landscape of chemical control strategies, including pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicide options, plant growth regulators, and emerging chemistries. Herbicide resistance in <i>Poa annua</i> continues to pose a significant challenge, with confirmed cases spanning multiple modes of action. Consequently, sustainable management depends on rotating herbicide classes, using mixtures and sequences of treatments, and integrating nonchemical tactics. Continued research into novel herbicide modes of action, application technologies, and integrated weed management approaches will be critical for maintaining long-term control of <i>Poa annua</i> across diverse turfgrass systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70092","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146680459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}