Differences in insect anatomy may affect tolerance to the fumigant ethanedinitrile

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences New Zealand Plant Protection Pub Date : 2018-07-30 DOI:10.30843/NZPP.2018.71.144
G. N. Gidiglo, A. Najar-Rodriguez, M. Hall, M. Minor, Qiao Wang
{"title":"Differences in insect anatomy may affect tolerance to the fumigant ethanedinitrile","authors":"G. N. Gidiglo, A. Najar-Rodriguez, M. Hall, M. Minor, Qiao Wang","doi":"10.30843/NZPP.2018.71.144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethanedinitrile (EDN) is a potential alternative fumigant to methyl bromide for the phytosanitary treatment of timber and logs. Previously, adult golden-haired bark beetles (Hylurgus ligniperda) have shown high rates of tolerance to EDN, while all life stages of burnt-pine longhorn beetles (Arhopalus ferus) were highly susceptible. These results suggest that the fumigant mode of action might be species-specific and more complex than previously thought. Therefore, the anatomy of these beetles was examined to investigate potential differences in EDN toxicity related to these insect traits. The mesothoracic and fourth abdominal cuticles of 20 individuals were measured and compared across the two species. Spiracle sizes of 20 adult insects were also measured and compared across and within species. Of the two species, A. ferus had the thicker dorsal thoracic and abdominal cuticle. Adults of A. ferus had also the larger total spiracle area. These results provide important information to help explain the observed differences in EDN tolerance across the two species. Further work will test the main route of entry of EDN into the bodies of target insects and additional effects on EDN on insect behaviour.","PeriodicalId":19180,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Plant Protection","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Plant Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30843/NZPP.2018.71.144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethanedinitrile (EDN) is a potential alternative fumigant to methyl bromide for the phytosanitary treatment of timber and logs. Previously, adult golden-haired bark beetles (Hylurgus ligniperda) have shown high rates of tolerance to EDN, while all life stages of burnt-pine longhorn beetles (Arhopalus ferus) were highly susceptible. These results suggest that the fumigant mode of action might be species-specific and more complex than previously thought. Therefore, the anatomy of these beetles was examined to investigate potential differences in EDN toxicity related to these insect traits. The mesothoracic and fourth abdominal cuticles of 20 individuals were measured and compared across the two species. Spiracle sizes of 20 adult insects were also measured and compared across and within species. Of the two species, A. ferus had the thicker dorsal thoracic and abdominal cuticle. Adults of A. ferus had also the larger total spiracle area. These results provide important information to help explain the observed differences in EDN tolerance across the two species. Further work will test the main route of entry of EDN into the bodies of target insects and additional effects on EDN on insect behaviour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
昆虫解剖结构的差异可能影响对熏蒸剂乙二腈的耐受性
乙二腈(EDN)是一种潜在的替代甲基溴的熏蒸剂,用于木材和原木的植物检疫处理。以前,成年金毛树皮甲虫(Hylurgus ligniperda)对EDN的耐受性很高,而所有生命阶段的烧松长角甲虫(Arhopalus ferus)都高度敏感。这些结果表明,熏蒸剂的作用方式可能是物种特异性的,比以前认为的更复杂。因此,对这些甲虫的解剖进行了检查,以研究与这些昆虫特征相关的EDN毒性的潜在差异。测量了20个个体的胸椎和第四腹部角质层,并对两个物种进行了比较。对20种成虫的气孔大小进行了测量和比较。在这两个物种中,黄貂鱼的胸背和腹部角质层较厚。成虫的气孔总面积也较大。这些结果提供了重要的信息,有助于解释两个物种之间EDN耐受性的差异。进一步的工作将测试EDN进入目标昆虫体内的主要途径以及EDN对昆虫行为的其他影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand Plant Protection
New Zealand Plant Protection Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: New Zealand Plant Protection is the journal of the New Zealand Plant Protection Society. It publishes original research papers on all aspects of biology, ecology and control of weeds, vertebrate and invertebrate pests, and pathogens and beneficial micro-organisms in agriculture, horticulture, forestry and natural ecosystems of relevance to New Zealand.
期刊最新文献
Potato mop-top virus: knowledge review, and evaluation of the biosecurity response to ‘incursion’ of this virus in New Zealand Fungi found in association with discoloured wood of kiwifruit vines in New Zealand Conifer samara structure diverges across the height of the tree crown Evaluating the densities and distribution of root-lesion nematodes (Partylenchus spp.) in wheat grown in Canterbury, New Zealand Testing Trichoderma species as biological agents for control of Dothistroma septosporum in Pinus radiata
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1