The management of brownfields in Ontario: A comprehensive review of remediation and reuse characteristics, trends, and outcomes, 2004–2015

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Practice Pub Date : 2018-03-26 DOI:10.1080/14660466.2018.1407615
C. D. De Sousa, T. Spiess
{"title":"The management of brownfields in Ontario: A comprehensive review of remediation and reuse characteristics, trends, and outcomes, 2004–2015","authors":"C. D. De Sousa, T. Spiess","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2018.1407615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Brownfields remediation and redevelopment continues to be an important issue for policy makers and planners seeking to unlock its many socio-economic and environmental benefits. While technical approaches to assessment and remediation have become rather standardized and governments have largely embraced voluntary programs to oversee their application, the degree of regulatory oversight continues to differ among jurisdictions. This article examines the scale and character of remediation activity in Ontario, Canada over the last decade using records submitted by qualified persons from the private sector. It finds that Ontario’s approach has been quite successful in scale and character in stronger urban real estate markets despite most matters related to cleanup and reuse escaping the direct oversight of provincial regulators. The province’s less-interventionist approach may need some review to address the nature of cleanup techniques being applied and the recent slowdown in cleanup and reuse activity, especially given the growing push toward regional growth management and more effective use of brownfield land resources in both larger urban areas, and smaller ones where greenfields are plentiful and brownfields are less competitive.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"15 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2018.1407615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Brownfields remediation and redevelopment continues to be an important issue for policy makers and planners seeking to unlock its many socio-economic and environmental benefits. While technical approaches to assessment and remediation have become rather standardized and governments have largely embraced voluntary programs to oversee their application, the degree of regulatory oversight continues to differ among jurisdictions. This article examines the scale and character of remediation activity in Ontario, Canada over the last decade using records submitted by qualified persons from the private sector. It finds that Ontario’s approach has been quite successful in scale and character in stronger urban real estate markets despite most matters related to cleanup and reuse escaping the direct oversight of provincial regulators. The province’s less-interventionist approach may need some review to address the nature of cleanup techniques being applied and the recent slowdown in cleanup and reuse activity, especially given the growing push toward regional growth management and more effective use of brownfield land resources in both larger urban areas, and smaller ones where greenfields are plentiful and brownfields are less competitive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安大略省棕地的管理:2004-2015年对修复和再利用特征、趋势和结果的综合回顾
棕地修复和再开发仍然是政策制定者和规划者寻求释放其许多社会经济和环境效益的重要问题。虽然评估和补救的技术方法已经相当标准化,政府也在很大程度上接受了自愿项目来监督它们的应用,但不同司法管辖区之间的监管监督程度仍然存在差异。本文利用私营部门合格人员提交的记录,考察了过去十年加拿大安大略省补救活动的规模和性质。报告发现,安大略省的方法在规模和性质上都相当成功,尽管大多数与清理和再利用有关的问题都逃脱了省级监管机构的直接监管。该省较少干预的做法可能需要一些审查,以解决正在应用的清理技术的性质,以及最近清理和再利用活动的放缓,特别是考虑到越来越多的推动区域增长管理和更有效地利用棕地资源,无论是在较大的城市地区,还是在绿地丰富、棕地缺乏竞争力的较小城市地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Practice
Environmental Practice ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals
期刊最新文献
Anthropological approaches for cultural resource conservation design and planning Cultural resources and landscape conservation design and planning Moving beyond the ecosystem in ecosystem health report cards Food Loss and Food Waste, Causes and Solutions Last issue of Environmental Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1