Risk factors of Secondary Traumatic Stress in psychotherapists studied during the COVID-19

A. Kulik, Natalia Kajka, A. Banakiewicz, Ewelina Frańczyk
{"title":"Risk factors of Secondary Traumatic Stress in psychotherapists studied during the COVID-19","authors":"A. Kulik, Natalia Kajka, A. Banakiewicz, Ewelina Frańczyk","doi":"10.12923/2353-8627/2023-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of the study was: to assess the severity of Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS), to identify ST's predictors, and to assess the model of relationships between predictors of Secondary Traumatic Stress in psychotherapists working during the pandemic in Poland.\nMaterials and methods: The research group consisted of 153 psychotherapists (130 women, 85%) aged 25-66 (M = 39.39; SD = 9.65). The following tools were used to measure the variables: Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), FCV-19S Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S), Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS), Personal Inquiry, Assessment of working conditions during a pandemic.\nDiscussion: It has been shown that 9.8% of psychotherapists working during the pandemic experienced high or very high-intensity of symptoms of Secondary Traumatic Stress. The predictors of STS turned out to be: task-induced stress during the pandemic, emotion-focused stress-coping style, and fear of COVID-19. The proposed model of moderated moderation, which assumes that COVID-19 anxiety that intensifies the emotional style of coping with stress in specialists, has an influence on the relationship between occupational tasks stress during a pandemic and the severity of symptoms of Secondary Traumatic Stress, has not been confirmed. Therefore, there is a need for further exploration of the issue.\nConclusions: Research shows an increase in STSD among Polish psychotherapists during covid as well as risk factors intensifying this diagnosis.\n\nKeywords: secondary traumatic stress, psychotherapist, anxiety, coping, risk factors","PeriodicalId":56342,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems of Psychiatry","volume":"45 15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12923/2353-8627/2023-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was: to assess the severity of Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS), to identify ST's predictors, and to assess the model of relationships between predictors of Secondary Traumatic Stress in psychotherapists working during the pandemic in Poland. Materials and methods: The research group consisted of 153 psychotherapists (130 women, 85%) aged 25-66 (M = 39.39; SD = 9.65). The following tools were used to measure the variables: Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), FCV-19S Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S), Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS), Personal Inquiry, Assessment of working conditions during a pandemic. Discussion: It has been shown that 9.8% of psychotherapists working during the pandemic experienced high or very high-intensity of symptoms of Secondary Traumatic Stress. The predictors of STS turned out to be: task-induced stress during the pandemic, emotion-focused stress-coping style, and fear of COVID-19. The proposed model of moderated moderation, which assumes that COVID-19 anxiety that intensifies the emotional style of coping with stress in specialists, has an influence on the relationship between occupational tasks stress during a pandemic and the severity of symptoms of Secondary Traumatic Stress, has not been confirmed. Therefore, there is a need for further exploration of the issue. Conclusions: Research shows an increase in STSD among Polish psychotherapists during covid as well as risk factors intensifying this diagnosis. Keywords: secondary traumatic stress, psychotherapist, anxiety, coping, risk factors
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19期间心理治疗师继发性创伤应激的危险因素研究
简介:本研究的目的是:评估继发性创伤压力(STS)的严重程度,确定ST的预测因素,并评估波兰大流行期间工作的心理治疗师的继发性创伤压力预测因素之间的关系模型。材料与方法:研究组共153名心理治疗师(女性130名,85%),年龄25 ~ 66岁(M = 39.39;Sd = 9.65)。使用以下工具测量变量:压力情况应对量表(CISS)、感知压力量表(PSS-10)、疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)、FCV-19S对COVID-19的恐惧量表(FCV-19S)、二次创伤压力量表(STSS)、个人询问、大流行期间工作条件评估。讨论:研究表明,在大流行期间工作的9.8%的心理治疗师经历了高强度或非常高强度的继发性创伤应激症状。STS的预测因素是:大流行期间任务引起的压力、以情绪为中心的压力应对方式和对COVID-19的恐惧。提出的有调节调节模型尚未得到证实,该模型假设COVID-19焦虑加剧了专家应对压力的情绪方式,影响了大流行期间职业任务压力与继发性创伤应激症状严重程度之间的关系。因此,有必要进一步探讨这一问题。结论:研究表明,在covid期间波兰心理治疗师中的性传播疾病增加,以及加剧这种诊断的风险因素。关键词:继发性创伤应激,心理治疗师,焦虑,应对,危险因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The quarterly Current Problems of Psychiatry is a continuation of the volume "Research on Schizophrenia" and is addressed to a wide group of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. The quarterly is a reviewed scientific journal of international scope, publishing original papers, review papers, case studies, conference reports, letters to the editor and book reviews. The aim of the "Current Problems of Psychiatry" is providing a wide audience with scientific works, representing a significant contribution to the development of psychiatry and clinical psychology. The works published in the journal are printed in Polish and English. Terms and Conditions for publishing manuscripts in the quarterly are available on the website www.cppsych.umlub.pl in the tab "Requirements".
期刊最新文献
Retrospective assessment of parental attitudes versus severity of early maladaptive schemas in a non-clinical population of Polish adults – preliminary reports Can an artist be mature? Rorschach studies of prominent Polish actors Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental state of Polish students Hungry brain: about the possible contribution of neurotrophic factors to anorexia nervosa Efficacy and safety assessment of different electrode placements during electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of depression: a comparison of bitemporal, bifrontal and unilateral right-sided stimulation - a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1