Customary Forests in West Papua: Contestation of Desires or Needs?

IF 1.7 Q2 FORESTRY Forest and Society Pub Date : 2021-07-18 DOI:10.24259/FS.V5I2.13350
A. Ungirwalu, S. Awang, Y. Runtuboi, Mariana Y. Peday, J. Marwa, Bustar Maitar, Agustinus Murdjoko, S. Fatem
{"title":"Customary Forests in West Papua: Contestation of Desires or Needs?","authors":"A. Ungirwalu, S. Awang, Y. Runtuboi, Mariana Y. Peday, J. Marwa, Bustar Maitar, Agustinus Murdjoko, S. Fatem","doi":"10.24259/FS.V5I2.13350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The challenge of integrating ecological, economic and social aspects of forest management is still a critical issue among stakeholders who agree on community-based forestry and the rights of indigenous peoples. In West Papua, the contrast of abundant natural resources with serious social inequalities and structured poverty is a continuing challenge for implementing a social forestry program. The process of establishing customary territories in West Papua is an important milestone in recognising its community entities. Is this scheme definitively able to answer the interests of access and management of indigenous peoples? This can help in achieving the sacred goal of protecting 70% of the forest area. This paper examines the dynamics of forest management in West Papua by the parties in customary forests. The low area designated for customary territories in West Papua, which has only reached 2,554.2 hectares, and the absence of a decree on the existence of customary forests is a form of injustice to the interests of local communities. The social forestry acceleration program intended to end the uncertainty surrounding customary forests is still in process. The roles of both on-site and off-site parties have not been optimal in realising customary forests in West Papua due to the complex and incomplete translation process at the site level. The results of the review show that interest is still focused on achieving an indicative-annual figure, which is still dominated by the village forest scheme. Hopefully, this year's acceleration of customary forests will become a milestone in West Papua, based on mutual need and desire.","PeriodicalId":43213,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24259/FS.V5I2.13350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The challenge of integrating ecological, economic and social aspects of forest management is still a critical issue among stakeholders who agree on community-based forestry and the rights of indigenous peoples. In West Papua, the contrast of abundant natural resources with serious social inequalities and structured poverty is a continuing challenge for implementing a social forestry program. The process of establishing customary territories in West Papua is an important milestone in recognising its community entities. Is this scheme definitively able to answer the interests of access and management of indigenous peoples? This can help in achieving the sacred goal of protecting 70% of the forest area. This paper examines the dynamics of forest management in West Papua by the parties in customary forests. The low area designated for customary territories in West Papua, which has only reached 2,554.2 hectares, and the absence of a decree on the existence of customary forests is a form of injustice to the interests of local communities. The social forestry acceleration program intended to end the uncertainty surrounding customary forests is still in process. The roles of both on-site and off-site parties have not been optimal in realising customary forests in West Papua due to the complex and incomplete translation process at the site level. The results of the review show that interest is still focused on achieving an indicative-annual figure, which is still dominated by the village forest scheme. Hopefully, this year's acceleration of customary forests will become a milestone in West Papua, based on mutual need and desire.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西巴布亚的传统森林:欲望还是需求的争论?
在同意以社区为基础的林业和土著人民权利的利益攸关方中,整合森林管理的生态、经济和社会方面的挑战仍然是一个关键问题。在西巴布亚,丰富的自然资源与严重的社会不平等和结构性贫困形成鲜明对比,这是实施社会林业计划的一个持续挑战。在西巴布亚建立习惯领土的过程是承认其社区实体的一个重要里程碑。这一计划是否确实能够满足土著人民获得和管理的利益?这有助于实现保护70%森林面积的神圣目标。本文考察了在习惯森林各方在西巴布亚森林管理的动态。西巴布亚指定为习惯领土的低地只有2 554.2公顷,而且没有一项关于存在习惯森林的法令,这是对当地社区利益的一种不公正的形式。旨在结束围绕传统森林的不确定性的社会林业加速方案仍在进行中。由于现场一级的翻译过程复杂和不完整,在实现西巴布亚习惯森林方面,现场和非现场各方的作用都不是最佳的。审查的结果表明,人们的兴趣仍然集中在实现一个指示性的年度数字上,这仍然是由村庄森林计划主导的。希望今年传统森林的加速将成为西巴布亚基于相互需要和愿望的一个里程碑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest and Society
Forest and Society FORESTRY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
35.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Plant Diversity, Traditional Utilization, and Community-Based Conservation of the Small-Scale Nong Sakae Community Forest in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand The Role of Local Governments in Supporting Social Forestry Implementation in Indonesia: A Social Network Analysis and Evidence from Eastern Indonesia Essential Ecosystem Area Policies as a Means to Promote Participatory and Inclusive Conservation in Forest Landscape Governance: Centering Perspectives of Marginalized Women in Taman Kili-Kili, Indonesia Revisiting the Implications of RSPO Smallholder Certification Relative to Farm Productivity in Riau, Indonesia Understanding the Safeguarding Role of Forest Resources and Its Determinants During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1