Universal community nucleic acid testing for COVID-19 in Hong Kong reveals insights into transmission dynamics: a cross-sectional and modelling study.

Bingyi Yang, T. Tsang, Huizhi Gao, E. Lau, Yun Lin, F. Ho, J. Xiao, J. Wong, D. Adam, Q. Liao, P. Wu, B. Cowling, G. Leung
{"title":"Universal community nucleic acid testing for COVID-19 in Hong Kong reveals insights into transmission dynamics: a cross-sectional and modelling study.","authors":"Bingyi Yang, T. Tsang, Huizhi Gao, E. Lau, Yun Lin, F. Ho, J. Xiao, J. Wong, D. Adam, Q. Liao, P. Wu, B. Cowling, G. Leung","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-542072/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nTesting of an entire community has been used as an approach to control COVID-19. In Hong Kong, a universal community testing programme (UCTP) was implemented at the fadeout phase of a community epidemic in July to September 2020. We described the utility of the UCTP in finding unrecognised infections, and analysed data from the UCTP and other sources to characterise transmission dynamics.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe described the characteristics of people participating in the UCTP and compared the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases detected by the UCTP versus those detected by clinical diagnosis and public health surveillance (CDPHS). We developed a Bayesian model to estimate the age-specific incidence of infection and the proportion of cases detected by CDPHS.\n\n\nRESULTS\n1.77 million people, 24% of the Hong Kong population, participated in the UCTP from 1 to 14 September 2020. The UCTP identified 32 new infections (1.8 per 100,000 samples tested), consisting of 29% of all local cases reported during the two-week UCTP period. Compared with the CDPHS, the UCTP detected a higher proportion of sporadic cases (62% versus 27%, p <0.01) and identified 6 (out of 18) additional clusters during that period. We estimated that 27% (95% credible interval: 22%, 34%) of all infections were detected by the CDPHS in the third wave.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWe reported empirical evidence of the utility of population-wide COVID-19 testing in detecting unrecognised infections and clusters. Around three quarters of infections have not been identified through existing surveillance approaches including contact tracing.","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-542072/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

BACKGROUND Testing of an entire community has been used as an approach to control COVID-19. In Hong Kong, a universal community testing programme (UCTP) was implemented at the fadeout phase of a community epidemic in July to September 2020. We described the utility of the UCTP in finding unrecognised infections, and analysed data from the UCTP and other sources to characterise transmission dynamics. METHODS We described the characteristics of people participating in the UCTP and compared the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases detected by the UCTP versus those detected by clinical diagnosis and public health surveillance (CDPHS). We developed a Bayesian model to estimate the age-specific incidence of infection and the proportion of cases detected by CDPHS. RESULTS 1.77 million people, 24% of the Hong Kong population, participated in the UCTP from 1 to 14 September 2020. The UCTP identified 32 new infections (1.8 per 100,000 samples tested), consisting of 29% of all local cases reported during the two-week UCTP period. Compared with the CDPHS, the UCTP detected a higher proportion of sporadic cases (62% versus 27%, p <0.01) and identified 6 (out of 18) additional clusters during that period. We estimated that 27% (95% credible interval: 22%, 34%) of all infections were detected by the CDPHS in the third wave. CONCLUSIONS We reported empirical evidence of the utility of population-wide COVID-19 testing in detecting unrecognised infections and clusters. Around three quarters of infections have not been identified through existing surveillance approaches including contact tracing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
香港COVID-19普遍社区核酸检测揭示传播动态:横断面和模型研究。
背景:对整个社区进行检测是控制COVID-19的一种方法。香港在2020年7月至9月的社区疫情消退阶段实施了一项普遍社区检测计划(UCTP)。我们描述了UCTP在发现未被识别的感染方面的效用,并分析了来自UCTP和其他来源的数据,以表征传播动态。方法描述参与UCTP的人员特征,并将UCTP检测到的COVID-19病例与临床诊断和公共卫生监测(CDPHS)检测到的病例的临床和流行病学特征进行比较。结果在2020年9月1日至14日期间,共有177万人(占香港人口的24%)参加了UCTP。UCTP确定了32例新感染(每100,000个检测样本中有1.8例),占在为期两周的UCTP期间报告的所有当地病例的29%。与CDPHS相比,UCTP检测到的散发病例比例更高(62%对27%,p <0.01),并在此期间发现了6个(18个)额外的聚集性病例。我们估计27%(95%可信区间:22%,34%)的感染在第三波中被CDPHS检测到。我们报告了全人群COVID-19检测在发现未被识别的感染和聚集性方面的实用性的经验证据。约四分之三的感染未通过包括接触者追踪在内的现有监测方法得到确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mass tuberculosis screening among the elderly: A population-based study in a well-confined rural county in eastern China. High-level Colonization With Antibiotic-Resistant Enterobacterales Among Individuals in a Semi-Urban Setting in South India: An Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) Study. Timing and Predictors of Loss of Infectivity among Healthcare Workers with Primary and Recurrent COVID-19: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study No immunological interference or safety concerns when adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine is coadministered with a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccine in adults aged 50 years and older: A randomized trial Metformin Use Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Veterans With Diabetes Hospitalized With Pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1