The post-postmodern subject: The role of narrative imagination in construing of the subject

V. Popović
{"title":"The post-postmodern subject: The role of narrative imagination in construing of the subject","authors":"V. Popović","doi":"10.5937/kultura2171055p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so-called \"postmodern turn\" has produced a sense of turmoil in contemporary philosophy and the humanities, subverting the Western mind and provoking doubts in its existence, sense of meaning and purpose. It disputes almost all basic premises of modernity. For example, notions such as: the self, the subject, imagination, became a target of vicious attacks by postmodern thinkers. Counter to the modern notion of the subject, the postmodern subject lacks an essential core of identity: it is fragmented, decentered, in the process of perpetual change or disintegration. A \"thinking and reflecting\" subject who looks inward to inspect the self is denied, as neither such an interiorized being that examines, conceptualize and interacts with others, nor interiority as such, exist. The subject is nowadays advised to search outward for the ways to interact with the social world, because this a privileged way of construing one's self. In similar fashion, imagination is obliterated and devoid of its creative powers. The \"imaginary\", as a reference to an impersonal entity, is substituted for the notion of imagination. While the latter stands for an \"author\" or \"creator\" who produces or creates images, the former is nothing creative in itself. The outcome is that, in the postmodern theory, the imagination is seen as an obsolete mental ability which is deposed of its power to create meaning. My intention in this paper is not to reanimate the modern notions of the self, the subject and imagination, but rather to consent with the postmodern verdict and proceed onward. It is my intention to build a post-postmodern notion of the self. The purpose of my paper is to introduce a post-Jungian account of the importance that the narrative and imagination have in human life for the constitution of subjectivity and the self.","PeriodicalId":53322,"journal":{"name":"Kultura Skopje","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura Skopje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2171055p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The so-called "postmodern turn" has produced a sense of turmoil in contemporary philosophy and the humanities, subverting the Western mind and provoking doubts in its existence, sense of meaning and purpose. It disputes almost all basic premises of modernity. For example, notions such as: the self, the subject, imagination, became a target of vicious attacks by postmodern thinkers. Counter to the modern notion of the subject, the postmodern subject lacks an essential core of identity: it is fragmented, decentered, in the process of perpetual change or disintegration. A "thinking and reflecting" subject who looks inward to inspect the self is denied, as neither such an interiorized being that examines, conceptualize and interacts with others, nor interiority as such, exist. The subject is nowadays advised to search outward for the ways to interact with the social world, because this a privileged way of construing one's self. In similar fashion, imagination is obliterated and devoid of its creative powers. The "imaginary", as a reference to an impersonal entity, is substituted for the notion of imagination. While the latter stands for an "author" or "creator" who produces or creates images, the former is nothing creative in itself. The outcome is that, in the postmodern theory, the imagination is seen as an obsolete mental ability which is deposed of its power to create meaning. My intention in this paper is not to reanimate the modern notions of the self, the subject and imagination, but rather to consent with the postmodern verdict and proceed onward. It is my intention to build a post-postmodern notion of the self. The purpose of my paper is to introduce a post-Jungian account of the importance that the narrative and imagination have in human life for the constitution of subjectivity and the self.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后后现代主体:叙事想象在主体建构中的作用
所谓的“后现代转向”在当代哲学和人文学科中产生了一种动荡感,颠覆了西方的思维,引发了对其存在感、意义感和目的感的质疑。它对现代性的几乎所有基本前提都提出了质疑。例如,自我、主体、想象等概念成为后现代思想家恶毒攻击的目标。与现代主体概念相反,后现代主体缺乏身份的基本核心:它是碎片化的、去中心化的,处于不断变化或解体的过程中。一个向内审视自我的“思考和反思”主体被否定了,因为既不存在这样一个审视、概念化和与他人互动的内化存在,也不存在这样的内在性。如今,这个主题被建议向外寻找与社会世界互动的方式,因为这是一种构建自我的特权方式。同样,想象力也被抹去,失去了创造力。“想象”,作为一个非个人实体的参考,取代了想象的概念。后者代表“作者”或“创造者”,他们生产或创造图像,而前者本身没有任何创造性。结果是,在后现代理论中,想象力被视为一种过时的精神能力,被剥夺了创造意义的能力。我在这篇文章中的意图并不是要重新激活自我、主体和想象的现代概念,而是同意后现代的结论并继续前进。我的目的是建立一个后后现代的自我概念。我这篇论文的目的是介绍一种后荣格的叙事和想象在人类生活中对主体性和自我构成的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Christian inspiration in contemporary Serbian poetry A modern age dialogue between orthodox theology and science Communication aspect of the justification of art in Christianity Endo Shusaku: The writer of inculturation Golden calf or worship of god: About Nikolaj Velimirović's understanding of culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1