Fluoroscopic measurements of the glenohumeral joint position and space in true anteroposterior and axillary views – a reliability study

IF 0.6 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Comparative Exercise Physiology Pub Date : 2022-06-13 DOI:10.3920/cep220006
M. Makhija, J. Sethi, C. Kataria, H. Singh, V. Phadke
{"title":"Fluoroscopic measurements of the glenohumeral joint position and space in true anteroposterior and axillary views – a reliability study","authors":"M. Makhija, J. Sethi, C. Kataria, H. Singh, V. Phadke","doi":"10.3920/cep220006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy has been used in shoulder pathologies to estimate the humeral head position (HHP) in the true anteroposterior (AP) view. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the reliability estimating it in the axillary view and in measuring the shoulder joint space width (JSW). True AP view images (n=36) of subjects with adhesive capsulitis were taken in supine in multiple arm abduction positions. The axillary view images (n=48) were taken in supine and prone in 75° of abduction. The HHP was assessed in the glenoid reference frame. The position and radius of the humeral head along with the superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, and middle JSWs were measured in each image. All the images were coded and randomly presented twice to a physiotherapist at a gap of 48-72 h for intra-rater reliability and to 2 therapists and an orthopaedic surgeon for inter-rater reliability. Reliability was expressed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). In both the views, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability was excellent for the radius of the humeral head (inter-rater – 0.95-0.97 and intra-rater -0.98)], moderate (ICC: 0.70 and 0.76), and excellent (ICC: 0.89 and 0.93) for HHP. The reliability for JSWs was moderate to good (ICC: 0.66-0.82) for inter-rater and good to excellent (ICC: 0.75-0.95) for intra-rater analysis. The SEM for HHP and JSWs were <0.4 mm for intra-rater analysis, and <0.7 mm for inter-rater reliability in both views. The study demonstrated that the glenohumeral arthrokinematic parameters can be measured with good to excellent levels of reliability when using 2 D fluoroscopy. The study is part of a clinical trial (Clinical Trial Registry India: CTRI/2018/12/016657).","PeriodicalId":10709,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/cep220006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy has been used in shoulder pathologies to estimate the humeral head position (HHP) in the true anteroposterior (AP) view. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the reliability estimating it in the axillary view and in measuring the shoulder joint space width (JSW). True AP view images (n=36) of subjects with adhesive capsulitis were taken in supine in multiple arm abduction positions. The axillary view images (n=48) were taken in supine and prone in 75° of abduction. The HHP was assessed in the glenoid reference frame. The position and radius of the humeral head along with the superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, and middle JSWs were measured in each image. All the images were coded and randomly presented twice to a physiotherapist at a gap of 48-72 h for intra-rater reliability and to 2 therapists and an orthopaedic surgeon for inter-rater reliability. Reliability was expressed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). In both the views, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability was excellent for the radius of the humeral head (inter-rater – 0.95-0.97 and intra-rater -0.98)], moderate (ICC: 0.70 and 0.76), and excellent (ICC: 0.89 and 0.93) for HHP. The reliability for JSWs was moderate to good (ICC: 0.66-0.82) for inter-rater and good to excellent (ICC: 0.75-0.95) for intra-rater analysis. The SEM for HHP and JSWs were <0.4 mm for intra-rater analysis, and <0.7 mm for inter-rater reliability in both views. The study demonstrated that the glenohumeral arthrokinematic parameters can be measured with good to excellent levels of reliability when using 2 D fluoroscopy. The study is part of a clinical trial (Clinical Trial Registry India: CTRI/2018/12/016657).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实前后位和腋位透视下肩关节位置和间隙的透视测量-可靠性研究
二维(2D)透视已用于肩部病理,以估计真正正位(AP)视图下的肱骨头位置(HHP)。然而,在腋窝视图和测量肩关节间隙宽度(JSW)中,缺乏关于可靠性估计的证据。粘连性囊炎患者(n=36)采用仰卧位多臂外展位拍摄真实AP视图。腋窝视图(n=48)分别在仰卧位和俯卧位75°外展时拍摄。在关节盂参考框架下评估HHP。在每张图像中测量肱骨头的位置和半径以及上、下、前、后和中jsw。所有图像都被编码并随机呈现两次给一名物理治疗师,间隔48-72小时进行评分内可靠性测试,以及2名治疗师和一名骨科医生进行评分间可靠性测试。信度用类内相关系数(ICC)和计量标准误差(SEM)表示。在这两个视图中,肱骨头半径的评分间信度和评分内信度为优秀(评分间- 0.95-0.97和评分内-0.98),中等(评分间:0.70和0.76),HHP的评分为优秀(评分间:0.89和0.93)。jsw的信度在评分间为中等至良好(ICC: 0.66-0.82),在评分内为良好至优秀(ICC: 0.75-0.95)。在两种视图中,HHP和jsw的内部信度SEM <0.4 mm,内部信度SEM <0.7 mm。研究表明,当使用二维透视时,盂肱关节运动学参数可以以良好到极好的可靠性进行测量。该研究是临床试验的一部分(印度临床试验注册中心:CTRI/2018/12/016657)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Exercise Physiology
Comparative Exercise Physiology VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: ''Comparative Exercise Physiology'' is the only international peer-reviewed scientific journal specifically dealing with the latest research in exercise physiology across all animal species, including humans. The major objective of the journal is to use this comparative approach to better understand the physiological, nutritional, and biochemical parameters that determine levels of performance and athletic achievement. Core subjects include exercise physiology, biomechanics, gait (including the effect of riders in equestrian sport), nutrition and biochemistry, injury and rehabilitation, psychology and behaviour, and breeding and genetics. This comparative and integrative approach to exercise science ultimately highlights the similarities as well as the differences between humans, horses, dogs, and other athletic or non-athletic species during exercise. The result is a unique forum for new information that serves as a resource for all who want to understand the physiological challenges with exercise.
期刊最新文献
Effect of exercise on different factors affecting the immune system The effect of four-weeks of CrossFit workouts on cardiovascular indicators and physical readiness in military forces ICEEP2022 dedicated issue Effect of weight carriage on work effort in horses Basculing in elite show jumping horses: a motion analysis study of trunk and neck movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1