Comparison of the efficacy of two phenotypic identification kits and classic PCR methods to identify Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from fish farms

IF 1.4 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY International Aquatic Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3153/ar23013
Şerafettin Balcı, Z. Ipek, A. Er, Ş. Kayış
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of two phenotypic identification kits and classic PCR methods to identify Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from fish farms","authors":"Şerafettin Balcı, Z. Ipek, A. Er, Ş. Kayış","doi":"10.3153/ar23013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, phenotypic identification kits have been reported to give incorrect results in identifying Aeromonas species, whereas molecular identification is quite reliable. In this context, Aeromonas hydrophila strains, isolated from fish farms (9 strains), identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, and ATCC strain bacteria were used in the present study for the determination of the usability of API 20NE and Microgen GN-ID A + B panel test kits. All strains were determined as A. hydrophila in molecular methods. After phenotypic identification, a 100% accuracy rate was obtained for A. hydrophila with API 20NE. In the Microgen GN-ID A + B, these rates were 60% for the strains used in this study. Phenotypic identification for the ATCC strain in both kits was correct. This study showed that the API 20NE test kit had high validation for the rapid and correct identification of fish pathogenic A. hydrophila.","PeriodicalId":13619,"journal":{"name":"International Aquatic Research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Aquatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3153/ar23013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, phenotypic identification kits have been reported to give incorrect results in identifying Aeromonas species, whereas molecular identification is quite reliable. In this context, Aeromonas hydrophila strains, isolated from fish farms (9 strains), identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, and ATCC strain bacteria were used in the present study for the determination of the usability of API 20NE and Microgen GN-ID A + B panel test kits. All strains were determined as A. hydrophila in molecular methods. After phenotypic identification, a 100% accuracy rate was obtained for A. hydrophila with API 20NE. In the Microgen GN-ID A + B, these rates were 60% for the strains used in this study. Phenotypic identification for the ATCC strain in both kits was correct. This study showed that the API 20NE test kit had high validation for the rapid and correct identification of fish pathogenic A. hydrophila.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种表型鉴定试剂盒和经典PCR方法鉴定养鱼场嗜水气单胞菌的效果比较
近年来,据报道,表型鉴定试剂盒在鉴定气单胞菌种类时给出了不正确的结果,而分子鉴定是相当可靠的。在此背景下,本研究采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法鉴定了从养鱼场分离的嗜水气单胞菌菌株(9株)和ATCC菌株,以确定API 20NE和Microgen GN-ID A + B面板检测试剂盒的可用性。所有菌株经分子鉴定均为嗜水单胞菌。表型鉴定后,API 20NE对嗜水单胞菌的检测准确率达到100%。在Microgen GN-ID A + B中,本研究中使用的菌株的这些比率为60%。两种试剂盒对ATCC菌株的表型鉴定均正确。本研究表明,API 20NE检测试剂盒对鱼类致病性嗜水单胞菌的快速、正确鉴定具有较高的验证性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Aquatic Research
International Aquatic Research MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal (IAR) is an international journal that publishes original research articles, short communications, and review articles in a broad range of areas relevant to all aspects of aquatic sciences (freshwater and marine). The Journal specifically strives to increase the knowledge of most aspects of applied researches in both cultivated and wild aquatic animals in the world. The journal is fully sponsored, which means it is free of charge for authors. The journal operates a single-blind peer review process. The main research areas in aquatic sciences include: -Aquaculture- Ecology- Food science and technology- Molecular biology- Nutrition- Physiology- Water quality- Climate Change
期刊最新文献
Effects of the fresh and dried housefly (Musca domestica) larvae in the diets of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758): growth, feed utilization efficiency, body composition and biological indices Investigation of the effects of some environmental variables on the zoobenthic community structure: The case of Porsuk Stream (Sakarya River, Türkiye) First record of the benthopelagic fish John dory Zeus faber (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Black Sea coasts of Türkiye Demographic characteristics and exploitation rate of Dormitator lebretonis (Pisces: Eleotridae: Steindachner, 1870) from four coastal lagoons of Southern Benin, West Africa Investigation of different lighting (LED, HPS and FLO) in aquaponics systems for joint production of different plants (Lettuce, Parsley and Cress) and koi carp
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1