Comparison Between Microscopic and Rapid Test Assay in the Detection of Malaria Parasite Infection in Patient Attending Some Hospitals in Sokoto Nigeria

Garba Ibrahim, Umar Asiya Imam, Ganau Ahmed Mohammed, Raji Mudasiru Iyanda Omowale, Fana Sani Abdullahi, Shinkafi Sa’adatu Aliyu, K. Ademola
{"title":"Comparison Between Microscopic and Rapid Test Assay in the Detection of Malaria Parasite Infection in Patient Attending Some Hospitals in Sokoto Nigeria","authors":"Garba Ibrahim, Umar Asiya Imam, Ganau Ahmed Mohammed, Raji Mudasiru Iyanda Omowale, Fana Sani Abdullahi, Shinkafi Sa’adatu Aliyu, K. Ademola","doi":"10.11648/j.ajbls.20200804.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malaria is a serious public health problem, this study was aimed at comparing Microscopy and Rapid Diagnostics test in malaria parasite detection in patients in some hospitals in Sokoto, Nigeria. Blood Samples were collected by venipuncture and dispensed into EDTA bottle. Thick blood films were made by adding few drops of anticoagulated blood on a clean glass slides and emulsifying to coin size using a spreader and allowed to air-dry and stained with 10% Geimsa stain for 10 minutes, allowed to air-dry and examined using ×100 objective to confirm the presence of malaria parasites. Of the 100 patients screened, 37% and 24% were positive for malaria using Carestart and SD-Bioline, while 53% were malaria positive by microscopy. Prevalence of malaria parasite by sex was 53.6% and 52.3% in females and males. Malaria prevalence by age was highest among patients aged 11-20, while the lowest prevalence was observed in patients aged 51-60 years. Based on occupation, the prevalence of malaria was highest among unemployed patients 58.5%, followed by 22.6% prevalence of malaria among business men and women. No significant difference was observed in malaria infection by sex, age and occupations P<0.05. The sensitivity and specificity of Carestart and SD-Bioline screening kits were 54.7% and 82.6%, 34.6 and 87.2%. The predictive positive value of Carestart was 78.4% while its negative predictive value was 61.3% in contrast to SD-Bioline with 75% and 54.7% as the positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Rapid diagnostic test are suitable alternatives to microscopy particularly in resources limited rural areas.","PeriodicalId":7857,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences","volume":"68 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20200804.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malaria is a serious public health problem, this study was aimed at comparing Microscopy and Rapid Diagnostics test in malaria parasite detection in patients in some hospitals in Sokoto, Nigeria. Blood Samples were collected by venipuncture and dispensed into EDTA bottle. Thick blood films were made by adding few drops of anticoagulated blood on a clean glass slides and emulsifying to coin size using a spreader and allowed to air-dry and stained with 10% Geimsa stain for 10 minutes, allowed to air-dry and examined using ×100 objective to confirm the presence of malaria parasites. Of the 100 patients screened, 37% and 24% were positive for malaria using Carestart and SD-Bioline, while 53% were malaria positive by microscopy. Prevalence of malaria parasite by sex was 53.6% and 52.3% in females and males. Malaria prevalence by age was highest among patients aged 11-20, while the lowest prevalence was observed in patients aged 51-60 years. Based on occupation, the prevalence of malaria was highest among unemployed patients 58.5%, followed by 22.6% prevalence of malaria among business men and women. No significant difference was observed in malaria infection by sex, age and occupations P<0.05. The sensitivity and specificity of Carestart and SD-Bioline screening kits were 54.7% and 82.6%, 34.6 and 87.2%. The predictive positive value of Carestart was 78.4% while its negative predictive value was 61.3% in contrast to SD-Bioline with 75% and 54.7% as the positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Rapid diagnostic test are suitable alternatives to microscopy particularly in resources limited rural areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镜检与快速检测法检测尼日利亚索科托部分医院患者疟原虫感染的比较
疟疾是一个严重的公共卫生问题,本研究旨在比较镜检法和快速诊断法在尼日利亚索科托一些医院患者疟疾寄生虫检测中的应用。静脉穿刺采血,并注于EDTA瓶中。在干净的玻璃载玻片上加入几滴抗凝血,用涂布器乳化成硬币大小,晾干,用10%的Geimsa染色10分钟,晾干,用×100物镜检查,以确认疟疾寄生虫的存在。在筛选的100名患者中,37%和24%的患者使用Carestart和SD-Bioline检测疟疾呈阳性,而53%的患者使用显微镜检测疟疾呈阳性。按性别分,女性和男性疟疾寄生虫患病率分别为53.6%和52.3%。按年龄划分,11-20岁患者疟疾患病率最高,51-60岁患者患病率最低。按职业划分,失业患者的疟疾患病率最高,为58.5%,其次是职业男女的疟疾患病率为22.6%。性别、年龄、职业间疟疾感染率差异无统计学意义P<0.05。Carestart和SD-Bioline筛查试剂盒的敏感性和特异性分别为54.7%和82.6%,34.6%和87.2%。Carestart的阳性预测值为78.4%,阴性预测值为61.3%,SD-Bioline的阳性预测值为75%,阴性预测值为54.7%。特别是在资源有限的农村地区,快速诊断测试是显微镜检查的合适替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Vitro Evaluation of Fungicides Against Mango Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Analysis of Thyroid Autoantibodies and Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Expression in Patients with Thyroid Diseases in High Iodine Areas of Cangzhou Surgical Resection of Rare Giant Cervical Lipoma Magnitude and Determinants of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure Among Hypertensive Patients in Northern Ethiopia, 2018: A Cross-Sectional Study Determinants of Low Birth Weight Among Newborns Delivered at Public Hospitals in Bale Zone, Southeastern Ethiopia: Unmatched Case-Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1