Tool selection based on rigidity in young children: a comparative approach (Selección de herramientas en función de su rigidez con niños preescolares: un enfoque comparativo)

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal for the Study of Education and Development Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1080/02103702.2021.2000128
Héctor M. Manrique, Yurena Hernández-Gálvez, Juan Hernández-Cabrera, C. J. Álvarez
{"title":"Tool selection based on rigidity in young children: a comparative approach (Selección de herramientas en función de su rigidez con niños preescolares: un enfoque comparativo)","authors":"Héctor M. Manrique, Yurena Hernández-Gálvez, Juan Hernández-Cabrera, C. J. Álvarez","doi":"10.1080/02103702.2021.2000128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fifty-one 23-to-55-month-old-infants faced two apparatuses that required the use of a rigid (box apparatus) or flexible (hose apparatus) stick-like tool to retrieve a toy stuck inside. Before attempting the extraction, however, they had to pick the only one tool (of three) on display that had the appropriate rigidity/flexibility to be effective. To inform their decisions, they could either manipulate the three tools themselves (haptic information) or observe the experimenter bending and unbending them for just five seconds each (visual information) before selection. Children found more difficulties in selecting appropriate flexible tools, as compared to rigid ones. Moreover, infants’ own haptic inspection of each tool did not significantly improve their selection accuracy, which indicates that observing the experimenter’s demonstration conveyed all the information required to make correct choices.","PeriodicalId":51988,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.2000128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fifty-one 23-to-55-month-old-infants faced two apparatuses that required the use of a rigid (box apparatus) or flexible (hose apparatus) stick-like tool to retrieve a toy stuck inside. Before attempting the extraction, however, they had to pick the only one tool (of three) on display that had the appropriate rigidity/flexibility to be effective. To inform their decisions, they could either manipulate the three tools themselves (haptic information) or observe the experimenter bending and unbending them for just five seconds each (visual information) before selection. Children found more difficulties in selecting appropriate flexible tools, as compared to rigid ones. Moreover, infants’ own haptic inspection of each tool did not significantly improve their selection accuracy, which indicates that observing the experimenter’s demonstration conveyed all the information required to make correct choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于幼儿刚性的工具选择:一种比较方法(基于幼儿刚性的工具选择:一种比较方法)
51名23 ~ 55个月大的婴儿面对两种器械,需要使用刚性(盒状器械)或柔性(软管状器械)棒状工具来取出卡在其中的玩具。然而,在尝试提取之前,他们必须在展示的三种工具中选择一种具有适当刚性/灵活性的有效工具。为了让他们做出决定,他们可以自己操纵这三种工具(触觉信息),或者在选择之前观察实验者弯曲和松开它们的五秒钟(视觉信息)。与刚性工具相比,孩子们在选择合适的柔性工具时遇到了更多的困难。此外,婴儿自己对每个工具的触觉检查并没有显著提高他们的选择准确性,这表明观察实验者的演示传达了做出正确选择所需的所有信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
VIVIR CON PILATES CUENTO INFANTIL COMO HERRAMIENTA PARA EL APRENDIZAJE DE LA TEORÍA DE CONJUNTOS BORROSOS EN LAS PRIMERAS EDADES REPENSAR LA EDUCACIÓN INFANTIL Y LA SOCIEDAD DESDE LOS CUIDADOS EJERCITO MI CEREBRO DURANTE EL CONFINAMIENTO PROPUESTA DIDÁCTICA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1