M. Kiaei, N. Hatam, Mina Moraveji, R. Moradi, M. Ahmadzadeh, S. Ghanavati
{"title":"The Relationship Between Strategic Thinking and Hospital Managers' Productivity in Teaching Hospitals of Shiraz","authors":"M. Kiaei, N. Hatam, Mina Moraveji, R. Moradi, M. Ahmadzadeh, S. Ghanavati","doi":"10.17795/BHS-33795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Using different methods of strategic thinking is essential for organizations such as hospitals; without them, many organizations will not survive. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between strategic thinking and management productivity in teaching hospitals of Shiraz. \nObjectives: Because of the importance of strategic management in organizational productivity, the present study is conducted with the goal of assessing the relationship between strategic thinking and hospital managers’ productivity. \nPatients and Methods: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted in 2015. The statistical population included all managers in different levels in the teaching hospitals of Shiraz (170 persons). Among these, 119 participants were selected through Cochran’s formula and a simple random sampling method. Data were collected by a questionnaire addressing strategic thinking based on Liedtka’s model and Hersey and Blanchard’s theory. Its validity was verified by a panel of experts and its reliability was measured in previous studies. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 20 using descriptive and analytic statistics (analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson’s correlation test and t-test). \nResults: The average and Standard Deviation of strategic thinking managers was (2.2 ± 0.04), and productivity of management (2.32 ± 0.37) was estimated on the average level. There was a direct meaningful relationship between strategically thinking managers and productivity (r = 0.387, P < 0.001). The results also showed that there is a meaningful correlation between strategic thinking and sustainability, organizational support and understanding of the job. \nConclusions: Due to the correlation between strategic thinking and productivity, we recommend educating and training managers in the use of strategic thinking, and that they understand its importance to productivity. Managers should understand that increasing efficiency in a competitive environment today is a necessity for survival.","PeriodicalId":8849,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/BHS-33795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background: Using different methods of strategic thinking is essential for organizations such as hospitals; without them, many organizations will not survive. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between strategic thinking and management productivity in teaching hospitals of Shiraz.
Objectives: Because of the importance of strategic management in organizational productivity, the present study is conducted with the goal of assessing the relationship between strategic thinking and hospital managers’ productivity.
Patients and Methods: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted in 2015. The statistical population included all managers in different levels in the teaching hospitals of Shiraz (170 persons). Among these, 119 participants were selected through Cochran’s formula and a simple random sampling method. Data were collected by a questionnaire addressing strategic thinking based on Liedtka’s model and Hersey and Blanchard’s theory. Its validity was verified by a panel of experts and its reliability was measured in previous studies. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 20 using descriptive and analytic statistics (analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson’s correlation test and t-test).
Results: The average and Standard Deviation of strategic thinking managers was (2.2 ± 0.04), and productivity of management (2.32 ± 0.37) was estimated on the average level. There was a direct meaningful relationship between strategically thinking managers and productivity (r = 0.387, P < 0.001). The results also showed that there is a meaningful correlation between strategic thinking and sustainability, organizational support and understanding of the job.
Conclusions: Due to the correlation between strategic thinking and productivity, we recommend educating and training managers in the use of strategic thinking, and that they understand its importance to productivity. Managers should understand that increasing efficiency in a competitive environment today is a necessity for survival.
背景:使用不同的战略思维方法对医院等组织至关重要;没有他们,许多组织将无法生存。本研究旨在探讨设拉子地区教学医院的战略思维与管理生产力的关系。目的:由于战略管理在组织生产力中的重要性,本研究旨在评估战略思维与医院管理者生产力之间的关系。患者和方法:本描述性相关研究于2015年进行。统计人群为设拉子省教学医院各级管理人员170人。其中,通过Cochran公式和简单随机抽样法选取119名参与者。数据的收集是基于Liedtka的模型和Hersey和Blanchard的理论的战略思维的问卷调查。其有效性已由专家小组验证,其可靠性已在先前的研究中测量。使用SPSS version 20进行数据分析,采用描述性统计和分析统计(方差分析(ANOVA)、Pearson相关检验和t检验)。结果:战略思维管理者的均值和标准差为(2.2±0.04),管理生产率为(2.32±0.37),处于平均水平。具有战略思维的管理者与生产力之间存在直接的有意义的关系(r = 0.387, P < 0.001)。结果还表明,战略思维与可持续性、组织支持和工作理解之间存在有意义的相关关系。结论:由于战略思维与生产力之间的相关性,我们建议教育和培训管理人员使用战略思维,并且他们了解战略思维对生产力的重要性。管理者应该明白,在当今竞争激烈的环境中提高效率是生存的必要条件。