Postharvest Management of Fungal Rot Agents of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) Using Leaf Extracts of Neem (Azadirachta indica)

A. S. Kiri, B. Zakari, G. Z. Jimeta, A. Isa
{"title":"Postharvest Management of Fungal Rot Agents of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) Using Leaf Extracts of Neem (Azadirachta indica)","authors":"A. S. Kiri, B. Zakari, G. Z. Jimeta, A. Isa","doi":"10.9734/aprj/2023/v11i3211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was carried out to manage groundnut seed rot in Mubi, Adamawa State Nigeria. Groundnut Rot was reported in all the three location surveyed and the average rot incidences in the market was 21%. Mubi New Market showed 25% as the highest percentage, followed by Mubi Old Market with 20% and MubiKuturu Market with 18%. Four organisms were isolated from the lesions on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) as follows; Aspergillus niger, Fusariumsolani, Rhizopus stolonifer and Aspergillus flavus. The pathogen most frequently occurring was Rhizopus stolonifer (67.22%), followed by Aspergillus niger (15.56%), Aspergillus flavus (15%) and the least was Fusarium solani (2.22%). Pathogenicity test confirmed that all four fungal isolates from groundnut seed were pathogenic and the level of severity was assessed with Aspergillus flavus being most severe with 83.3%, followed by Aspergillus niger with 50%, Rhizopus stolonifer 50% and Fusarium solani 33.33%. Plant extracts employed to control the vegetative mycelial growth was from aqueous and ethanolic leaf extracts of neem at 20%, 40% and 60% concentration. In vitro application of extracts for the control showed that neem aqueous controlled the mycelial growth better as compared with neem ethanol extracts. There was complete inhibition at 60% on Rhizopus stolonifer and Fusarium solani while neem ethanol on Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus niger showed progressive inhibition on mycelial growth. There was a significant difference on vegetative growth of the fungi on both neem extracts with increase in concentration at p= 0.0001 as compared with the control. It is recommended that the use of antimicrobials commonly found in populated areas of rural areas can be used to reduce chemical costs and smallholder farmers' over-reliance on agricultural chemicals reduce.","PeriodicalId":8546,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Plant Science & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Plant Science & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/aprj/2023/v11i3211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was carried out to manage groundnut seed rot in Mubi, Adamawa State Nigeria. Groundnut Rot was reported in all the three location surveyed and the average rot incidences in the market was 21%. Mubi New Market showed 25% as the highest percentage, followed by Mubi Old Market with 20% and MubiKuturu Market with 18%. Four organisms were isolated from the lesions on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) as follows; Aspergillus niger, Fusariumsolani, Rhizopus stolonifer and Aspergillus flavus. The pathogen most frequently occurring was Rhizopus stolonifer (67.22%), followed by Aspergillus niger (15.56%), Aspergillus flavus (15%) and the least was Fusarium solani (2.22%). Pathogenicity test confirmed that all four fungal isolates from groundnut seed were pathogenic and the level of severity was assessed with Aspergillus flavus being most severe with 83.3%, followed by Aspergillus niger with 50%, Rhizopus stolonifer 50% and Fusarium solani 33.33%. Plant extracts employed to control the vegetative mycelial growth was from aqueous and ethanolic leaf extracts of neem at 20%, 40% and 60% concentration. In vitro application of extracts for the control showed that neem aqueous controlled the mycelial growth better as compared with neem ethanol extracts. There was complete inhibition at 60% on Rhizopus stolonifer and Fusarium solani while neem ethanol on Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus niger showed progressive inhibition on mycelial growth. There was a significant difference on vegetative growth of the fungi on both neem extracts with increase in concentration at p= 0.0001 as compared with the control. It is recommended that the use of antimicrobials commonly found in populated areas of rural areas can be used to reduce chemical costs and smallholder farmers' over-reliance on agricultural chemicals reduce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
花生真菌腐病剂的采后管理印楝叶提取物的研究
本研究是为了管理尼日利亚阿达马瓦州Mubi的花生种子腐烂而进行的。三个调查地点均有花生腐病报告,市场平均腐病发生率为21%。Mubi New Market的比例最高,为25%,其次是Mubi Old Market,为20%,MubiKuturu Market为18%。从马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(Potato Dextrose Agar, PDA)的病变中分离出4种微生物:黑曲霉、枯萎霉、匍匐茎霉和黄曲霉。病原菌最多的是匍匐茎霉(67.22%),其次是黑曲霉(15.56%)和黄曲霉(15%),最少的是茄枯菌(2.22%)。结果表明,4株花生种子真菌均具有致病性,其中黄曲霉致病性最强,达83.3%,其次为黑曲霉(50%)、匍匐茎霉(50%)和茄枯镰刀菌(33.33%)。采用20%、40%和60%浓度的印楝叶水提液和乙醇提液控制营养菌丝生长。体外对照实验表明,印楝水提物对菌丝生长的控制优于印楝乙醇提物。印楝乙醇对匍匐茎霉和茄枯菌的抑制率为60%,对黄曲霉和黑曲霉的抑制率为渐进式。与对照相比,两种印楝提取物对真菌的营养生长有显著差异,浓度均增加(p= 0.0001)。建议使用农村人口稠密地区常见的抗微生物药物,以降低化学品成本,减少小农对农用化学品的过度依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-vitro Pharmacological Investigation of Ludwigia adscendens A Comprehensive Review of Salacia reticulata: Botanical, Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical, and Pharmacological Insights Evaluation of In-vitro Anti-inflammatory Activity of Sri Lankan Medicinal Pill of Aloe vera, Centella asiatica, and Strychnos potatorum Exacts Using Egg Albumin Denaturation Assay Evaluation of Maize Varieties at Seedling Stage under Drought Stress Based on Morpho-physiological and Biochemical Attributes Estimation of Diospyros melanoxylon Roxb. Leaves Production in Forests of Jharkhand, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1