Statistical Analysis for Selective Identifications of VOCs by Using Surface Functionalized MoS2 Based Sensor Array

U. N. Thakur, Radha Bhardwaj, A. Hazra
{"title":"Statistical Analysis for Selective Identifications of VOCs by Using Surface Functionalized MoS2 Based Sensor Array","authors":"U. N. Thakur, Radha Bhardwaj, A. Hazra","doi":"10.3390/csac2021-10451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disease diagnosis through breath analysis has attracted significant attention in recent years due to its noninvasive nature, rapid testing ability, and applicability for patients of all ages. More than 1000 volatile organic components (VOCs) exist in human breath, but only selected VOCs are associated with specific diseases. Selective identification of those disease marker VOCs using an array of multiple sensors are highly desirable in the current scenario. The use of efficient sensors and the use of suitable classification algorithms is essential for the selective and reliable detection of those disease markers in complex breath. In the current study, we fabricated a noble metal (Au, Pd and Pt) nanoparticle-functionalized MoS2 (Chalcogenides, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)-based sensor array for the selective identification of different VOCs. Four sensors, i.e., pure MoS2, Au/MoS2, Pd/MoS2, and Pt/MoS2 were tested under exposure to different VOCs, such as acetone, benzene, ethanol, xylene, 2-propenol, methanol and toluene, at 50 °C. Initially, principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used to discriminate those seven VOCs. As compared to the PCA, LDA was able to discriminate well between the seven VOCs. Four different machine learning algorithms such as k-nearest neighbors (kNN), decision tree, random forest, and multinomial logistic regression were used to further identify those VOCs. The classification accuracy of those seven VOCs using KNN, decision tree, random forest, and multinomial logistic regression was 97.14%, 92.43%, 84.1%, and 98.97%, respectively. These results authenticated that multinomial logistic regression performed best between the four machine learning algorithms to discriminate and differentiate the multiple VOCs that generally exist in human breath.","PeriodicalId":9815,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Proceedings","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/csac2021-10451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Disease diagnosis through breath analysis has attracted significant attention in recent years due to its noninvasive nature, rapid testing ability, and applicability for patients of all ages. More than 1000 volatile organic components (VOCs) exist in human breath, but only selected VOCs are associated with specific diseases. Selective identification of those disease marker VOCs using an array of multiple sensors are highly desirable in the current scenario. The use of efficient sensors and the use of suitable classification algorithms is essential for the selective and reliable detection of those disease markers in complex breath. In the current study, we fabricated a noble metal (Au, Pd and Pt) nanoparticle-functionalized MoS2 (Chalcogenides, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)-based sensor array for the selective identification of different VOCs. Four sensors, i.e., pure MoS2, Au/MoS2, Pd/MoS2, and Pt/MoS2 were tested under exposure to different VOCs, such as acetone, benzene, ethanol, xylene, 2-propenol, methanol and toluene, at 50 °C. Initially, principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used to discriminate those seven VOCs. As compared to the PCA, LDA was able to discriminate well between the seven VOCs. Four different machine learning algorithms such as k-nearest neighbors (kNN), decision tree, random forest, and multinomial logistic regression were used to further identify those VOCs. The classification accuracy of those seven VOCs using KNN, decision tree, random forest, and multinomial logistic regression was 97.14%, 92.43%, 84.1%, and 98.97%, respectively. These results authenticated that multinomial logistic regression performed best between the four machine learning algorithms to discriminate and differentiate the multiple VOCs that generally exist in human breath.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于表面功能化MoS2传感器阵列的VOCs选择性识别统计分析
近年来,通过呼吸分析进行疾病诊断因其无创性、快速检测能力和适用于所有年龄的患者而备受关注。人体呼吸中存在1000多种挥发性有机成分(VOCs),但只有特定的VOCs与特定的疾病有关。在目前的情况下,使用多个传感器阵列选择性地识别这些疾病标志物VOCs是非常可取的。使用高效的传感器和使用合适的分类算法对于选择性和可靠地检测复杂呼吸中的这些疾病标志物至关重要。在本研究中,我们制作了一种贵金属(Au, Pd和Pt)纳米粒子功能化的MoS2 (Chalcogenides, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)传感器阵列,用于选择性识别不同的VOCs。在50℃的条件下,测试了纯MoS2、Au/MoS2、Pd/MoS2和Pt/MoS2四种传感器暴露于丙酮、苯、乙醇、二甲苯、2-丙烯醇、甲醇和甲苯等不同挥发性有机化合物下的性能。首先,采用主成分分析(PCA)和线性判别分析(LDA)对这7种VOCs进行了判别。与PCA相比,LDA能够很好地区分七种挥发性有机化合物。采用k近邻(kNN)、决策树、随机森林和多项逻辑回归等四种不同的机器学习算法进一步识别这些挥发性有机化合物。采用KNN、决策树、随机森林和多项逻辑回归对这7种VOCs的分类准确率分别为97.14%、92.43%、84.1%和98.97%。这些结果验证了多项逻辑回归在四种机器学习算法中表现最好,以区分和区分人类呼吸中普遍存在的多种挥发性有机化合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mesoporous Silica Systems Loaded with Polyphenols Extraction of Germinated Seeds by Conventional and Modern Methods A Computational Study to Identify Some Potential Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease from Biological Active Quinolones Chitosan-Based Bactericidal Interpenetrated Hydrogels Treatment of Dairy Wastewaters Using Nannochloris sp. Microalgae Strain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1