The Problem with “Justifying” Abortion: Why Real Reproductive Justice Cannot Be Achieved by Theorizing the Legitimacy of Abortion

K. Kimport, M. McLemore
{"title":"The Problem with “Justifying” Abortion: Why Real Reproductive Justice Cannot Be Achieved by Theorizing the Legitimacy of Abortion","authors":"K. Kimport, M. McLemore","doi":"10.1080/03610926.2021.1999587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a commentary on Adair and Lozano’s (2021) article “Adaptive choice: Psychological Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Freedom.” We offer a critique of its underlying premise that abortion must be justified, identifying three substantive concerns. Then, we outline a better way to study abortion, one that draws on feminist and reproductive justice scholarship by: centering the lived experience of real people and their needs; holding that it is a fundamental human right of people to reproduce if and when they desire; and conducting research that benefits people, with a focus on those who are socially marginalized.","PeriodicalId":75331,"journal":{"name":"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2021.1999587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This is a commentary on Adair and Lozano’s (2021) article “Adaptive choice: Psychological Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Freedom.” We offer a critique of its underlying premise that abortion must be justified, identifying three substantive concerns. Then, we outline a better way to study abortion, one that draws on feminist and reproductive justice scholarship by: centering the lived experience of real people and their needs; holding that it is a fundamental human right of people to reproduce if and when they desire; and conducting research that benefits people, with a focus on those who are socially marginalized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“正当化”堕胎的问题:为什么真正的生殖正义不能通过理论化堕胎的合法性来实现
这是对Adair和Lozano(2021)的文章《适应性选择:堕胎和生育自由的心理学视角》的评论。我们对它的基本前提——堕胎必须是正当的——提出了批评,指出了三个实质性的问题。然后,我们概述了一种更好的研究堕胎的方法,一种借鉴女权主义和生殖正义学术的方法:以真实的人的生活经历和他们的需求为中心;认为生育是人类的一项基本人权,只要他们愿意,随时都可以生育;开展有利于人们的研究,重点关注那些被社会边缘化的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Spectrum of Hesitancy in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Pregnant Latinas on the United States-Mexico Border. Exploring the Experiences of Community-Based Doulas That Serve Immigrant, Migrant, and Refugee Clients in Arkansas. Weight Stigma and Implicit Bias in Healthcare: Investigating the Impact of Women's Body Size on Continuity of Care and Communication About Sexual and Reproductive Health. Adaptation and Reflection in the Transition to Parenthood for Women With Risk Factors for Early Parenting Difficulties Who Participated in the STAR Mums Program A Bother or a Benefit? How Contraceptive Users Balance the Trade-Offs Between Preferred Menstrual Bleeding Patterns and Preferred Contraceptive Methods in India, South Africa, and the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1